Down the Hill wrote:I know very little about how serious things got re. Brighton moving into SAAFL. We are one of the main drivers in activating discussion at club and SFL level for 2 Divs in 2013 which shows we are committed to the SFL provided they can accept that 10 years of the current set up has not worked and clubs who field a full deck of teams are actually disadvantaged by not having all teams playing at the same venue every Saturday. We had 2 home games in 2011 where we only had A & B grade games plus some away games where the juniors played at 1 or 2 different venues to where the A & B grade were playing. For home games this costs big money in lost revenue from gate, BBQ and canteen. It is also a nightmare for organising support staff such as trainers, goal umps, boundary umps, water stewards etc. etc. and it is usually the clubs that have the 5 teams that suffer with this situation. So its not just a matter of having too many one sided games but also the shocking programming logistics some weeks created by clubs that can't field all teams. We must be the only footy comp in the nation that functions this way and if the SFL doesn't respond to the need for change then there will be rumours of more clubs looking to jump ship.
Excuse my ignorance DTH, but I am obviously missing something here ...
I'm interested in the idea that moving to SAAFL would be somehow better in regard to the problem of having missing timeslots, ie " ... only had A & B grade games .... For home games this costs big money in lost revenue from gate, BBQ and canteen."
As far as I was aware the Amateurs only normally have 2 matches (ie A&B) at home on Sats, and all Juniors are played on Sundays.
If that's the case, the financial dramas you talk about occur every home game, and the B's matches always start with a crowd of approx 2.3 people & a dog or two
