Quichey wrote:Why do we have a review system for the no-ball, but not for everything else?!![]()
![]()
![]()
Agree, if the Indians aren't willing to use the referal system in its entirity why then should they get the benieft of the third umpire using technology.
by whufc » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:04 pm
Quichey wrote:Why do we have a review system for the no-ball, but not for everything else?!![]()
![]()
![]()
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:09 pm
frontfoot wrote:Sachin is toying* with Lyon
by stampy » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:12 pm
by locky801 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:13 pm
whufc wrote:Quichey wrote:Why do we have a review system for the no-ball, but not for everything else?!![]()
![]()
![]()
Agree, if the Indians aren't willing to use the referal system in its entirity why then should they get the benieft of the third umpire using technology.
by whufc » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:14 pm
by JK » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:16 pm
Johno6 wrote:Jimmy wrote:Johno6 wrote:LMFAO at the camera guy
That was classic. Almost could have been deliberate to get interviewed haha.
clarke and haddens reaction was gold to...
that will get played on every news channel highlights tonight
by test » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:18 pm
whufc wrote:3-0 INDIA?
not the series result either!
by CoverKing » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:20 pm
test wrote:whufc wrote:3-0 INDIA?
not the series result either!
Its gotta go our way eventually!!
by Q. » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:28 pm
by NFC » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:30 pm
by Big Phil » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:31 pm
Media Park wrote:Tendulkar will score his 100th International Hundred in this Test Match.
You heard it here first...
by locky801 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:32 pm
Big Phil wrote:Media Park wrote:Tendulkar will score his 100th International Hundred in this Test Match.
You heard it here first...
Will have to be in the 2nd innings now
by Media Park » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:38 pm
Big Phil wrote:Media Park wrote:Tendulkar will score his 100th International Hundred in this Test Match.
You heard it here first...
Will have to be in the 2nd innings now
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:42 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:58 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Hope he never gets it
by westcoastpanther » Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:10 pm
Jim05 wrote:Geez that shits me, settle in to watch the cricket then we are bowled out and have 10 minutes break, come back on for 3 overs and then go to friggin lunch
by am Bays » Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:57 pm
mal wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:mal wrote:IN 2/130
THE GREAT WALL OF INDIA 34*[93]
LITTLE CHAMP 24*[23]
With no 5th bowler , the 4 man attack might struggle
How many teams play 5 bowlers.
Australia until Watson got injured
Australia until Andrew Symonds retired
by Media Park » Tue Dec 27, 2011 7:03 pm
am Bays wrote:Who was our 5th bowler from 1995-2005 when we smacked all comers
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Dec 27, 2011 7:11 pm
am Bays wrote:Our biggest problem is that were a 100 runs short of were we should be. We can blame selections, we can blame umpires, we can blame the ICC and having just come off SL.org, gee blame Garry Metcalf too, but bottome line we haven't performed with the Bat.
by MAY-Z » Tue Dec 27, 2011 7:19 pm
locky801 wrote:whufc wrote:Quichey wrote:Why do we have a review system for the no-ball, but not for everything else?!![]()
![]()
![]()
Agree, if the Indians aren't willing to use the referal system in its entirity why then should they get the benieft of the third umpire using technology.
If Dravid had hit that ball for 4 would have the umpire called for a review. NO
so far I have only seen reviews for no-balls when wickets fall, wonder if there is any particular reason for that
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |