by Q. » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:35 pm
by Gozu » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:13 am
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:02 am
Gozu wrote:The ultra-right's Cory Bernardi via his website Menzies House takes up the fight against...bicycle helmets!
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2011/12/ ... -laws.html
by Psyber » Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:51 am
I couldn't find a mention of him either - I think he has been spun in..Jimmy_041 wrote:I'm lost - where does it mention Bernardi?Gozu wrote:The ultra-right's Cory Bernardi via his website Menzies House takes up the fight against...bicycle helmets!
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2011/12/ ... -laws.html
by southee » Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:04 am
Gozu wrote:The ultra-right's Cory Bernardi via his website Menzies House takes up the fight against...bicycle helmets!
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2011/12/ ... -laws.html
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:13 am
by Leaping Lindner » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:21 pm
by Gozu » Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:00 pm
by Sojourner » Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:53 am
by dedja » Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:21 am
by Psyber » Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:25 am
I know Telstra signed an agreement (for a large amount of money) to not undermine it by developing wireless technology in competition but did anybody else?dedja wrote:I think you've forgotten that the NBN is a business that will earn significant ongoing income on it's assets ... just like Telstra who has make squillions on it's fixed copper network for years.
by dedja » Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:31 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:16 pm
by Sojourner » Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:03 pm
by southee » Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:36 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:dunno which thread to put it in or if it been mentioned
but any thoughts on the state govt selling off the forestry industry?
by Gozu » Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:24 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:dunno which thread to put it in or if it been mentioned
but any thoughts on the state govt selling off the forestry industry?
by dedja » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:46 am
by southee » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:33 am
dedja wrote:Sure, by all means let the government reverse their decision to sell forest rotations, but then they'd have to shelve the Adelaide Oval upgrade ... the money has to come from somewhere.
by Psyber » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:06 am
southee wrote:So they should .... I would rather no adelaide oval to save alot of people's jobs in the south east.dedja wrote:Sure, by all means let the government reverse their decision to sell forest rotations, but then they'd have to shelve the Adelaide Oval upgrade ... the money has to come from somewhere.
Alot of people's lives ruined for it .
by Sojourner » Sun Dec 11, 2011 10:11 am
dedja wrote:Sure, by all means let the government reverse their decision to sell forest rotations, but then they'd have to shelve the Adelaide Oval upgrade ... the money has to come from somewhere.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |