Abbott/Liberal Govt Watch

[straight talker]

Assuming????

[fish]

Tony what were you thinking?

[straight talker]

just saying that downer has taught the person well.

[Q.]

Abbott absurdities on climate change

[straight talker]

OH MY GOD Q. now you are posting from freaky opinion sites!

[Sky Pilot]

OH MY GOD Q. now you are posting from freaky opinion sites!

careful ST this is a green/leftie site. Give them a break they are after all very simple in their disturbed thinking. They voted for Whitlam and Hawke and keating and Rudd bwhoarrrrr haaaaa they know not better

[Sky Pilot]

Oh I forgot - Rann/Foley too. I am wetting my pants

[straight talker]

very funny that when i was putting up quotes from sites that were catching JULIAR and her kronies out lying and being incompetent they were all crack sites and just opinion sites now have a look where all there info is coming from?

[Mad Mat]

very funny that when i was putting up quotes from sites that were catching JULIAR and her kronies out lying and being incompetent they were all crack sites and just opinion sites now have a look where all there info is coming from?

Let me guess GetUp!?

[Q.]

Larvatus Prodeo. A self-admitted left-leaning, but prominent and well-respected blog.

The article I posted is factual content.

[Q.]

OH MY GOD Q. now you are posting from freaky opinion sites!

careful ST this is a green/leftie site. Give them a break they are after all very simple in their disturbed thinking.

That's pretty funny, especially coming from the computer of someone who denounces science!

[Sky Pilot]

OH MY GOD Q. now you are posting from freaky opinion sites!

careful ST this is a green/leftie site. Give them a break they are after all very simple in their disturbed thinking.

That's pretty funny, especially coming from the computer of someone who denounces science!

You are - as usual - way off the mark Q. I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

[Psyber]

That's pretty funny, especially coming from the computer of someone who denounces science!

You are - as usual - way off the mark Q. I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Every interest group has a core that denies the science they don't like.
For example, there are those who believe in man made global warming and the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions, who won't look at modern safe nuclear technology.
It is the obvious solution - France emits 90 gm of CO2 for each KW hour of energy, while Denmark, using the Aussie model emits 650 gm per KW hour.

Some of those trot out the failures at Chernobyl, which was out of date when built, and Fukushima, which was 3 years past its decommissioning date, as a defence.
Yet Fukushima only melted down because none of the three back up diesel generators had been maintained well enough to start when needed.
Neither was an inherent nuclear technology failure - both were policy and administrative decision based ones that France demonstrates can be avoided.

[Q.]

OH MY GOD Q. now you are posting from freaky opinion sites!

careful ST this is a green/leftie site. Give them a break they are after all very simple in their disturbed thinking.

That's pretty funny, especially coming from the computer of someone who denounces science!

You are - as usual - way off the mark Q. I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

I work with Scientists and you are the one who is way off the mark. You obviously have no idea of how the peer review system works, let alone understand the integrity and perfection that those in the industry work toward.

[straight talker]

the carbon issue and tax system is going pretty well in other countries isnt it??? there economies are booming!

[Q.]

the carbon issue and tax system is going pretty well in other countries isnt it??? there economies are booming!

Get a clue. You're using a false extrapolation.

[straight talker]

well they are going well arent they??

[Psyber]

I work with Scientists and you are the one who is way off the mark. You obviously have no idea of how the peer review system works, let alone understand the integrity and perfection that those in the industry work toward.

Peer Review is a two-edged sword.
It seeks to maintain standards, but tends to reinforce existing established views within the group concerned.

For example, in medical science Peer Review tends to suppress the publishing of dissenting evidence, and tends to ensure that DSM-V will maintain the standard US view that Schizoaffective Disorder is a sub-variant of Schizophrenia.

By contrast British and European thinking along with a significant group in OZ would support its being seen as a variant of Bipolar Disorder, based on its usual course and better response to treatment.
This was the British and European consensus before the insurance and legal industries embraced and entrenched the US view world-wide.
That "establishment" makes it harder to shift the opinion of the conventional people in positions of power who do the Peer Review.
(And national pride makes the Yanks inclined to hang on to their leading position.)

[fish]

very funny that when i was putting up quotes from sites that were catching JULIAR and her kronies out lying and being incompetent they were all crack sites and just opinion sites now have a look where all there info is coming from?

Nothing that Quichey or anyone else ever posts on this site will come remotely close to your legendary Minnesotans for Global Warming post.

[fish]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?