SA Footy • View topic

by **GWW** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:25 pm

Sounds like Hackham in for a very long year in Southern League, given than Yank have lost quite a few players themselves.

They (Hackham) could very well become the new Port Elliot of South Australian footy, especially given the recruits that Aldinga have apparently signed.

by **Bully** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:27 am

Plympton VS Myponga on saturday, was even game untill last quarter they ran over us a bit. Think it finished 18 goals to 13 goals or something

by **FootyMad** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:50 am

Encounter Bay lost to Kangarilla after leading comfortably all day, Bays tried some new things and some old things while Kangarilla just kept on keeping on and pluggin away to eventually run out winners.

by **limb** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:52 am

Langhorne Creek went up to Berri and beat them by 25 goals in both the A & B Grade.

by **FootyMad** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:55 am

Ouch, were Berri ordinary or were the Creeks just far superior?
The GSFL from all reports is a better footy standard?

by **ROOS** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:57 am

by **limb** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:20 pm

FootyMad wrote:Ouch, were Berri ordinary or were the Creeks just far superior?
The GSFL from all reports is a better footy standard?

A bit of both I think.. There appeared to be a fair gap between the two side's fitness levels.

by **FootyMad** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:24 pm

Yeah I just read on the Riverland thread that they are expected to come bottom this year (Berri)
Any goss from around the traps re: Strath, Encounter, Compass, McLaren?

by **Dogwatcher** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:26 pm

ROOS wrote:berri will finsh bottom i predict by a mile

Big call there Roos - Barmera have lost a shite load of players. And unless you're not telling us something, have picked up very few. It could be a bit more even between those two sides than you're suggesting.

But - this discussions best reserved for hte Riverland thread.

by **the saint** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:37 pm

Newman wrote:Your stupidity is highlighted in your messages Saint. Who do you play for you wank, or do you just sit on the sidelines and make special comments.

Mate I would have played a lot more footy than you and I coach a side,what do you do Sidchrome

by **GWW** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:57 pm

the saint wrote:
Newman wrote:Your stupidity is highlighted in your messages Saint. Who do you play for you wank, or do you just sit on the sidelines and make special comments.
Mate I would have played a lot more footy than you and I coach a side,what do you do Sidchrome

He drives a Mail Truck and eats muffins :lol:

by **the saint** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:25 pm

GWW wrote:
the saint wrote:
Newman wrote:Your stupidity is highlighted in your messages Saint. Who do you play for you wank, or do you just sit on the sidelines and make special comments.
Mate I would have played a lot more footy than you and I coach a side,what do you do Sidchrome

He drives a Mail Truck and eats muffins

pay that

by **the saint** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:55 pm

limb wrote:
FootyMad wrote:Ouch, were Berri ordinary or were the Creeks just far superior?
The GSFL from all reports is a better footy standard?

A bit of both I think.. There appeared to be a fair gap between the two side's fitness levels.

Limb who was the tall blonde reserves ruckman who went up and took some strong marks in the A grade and kicked a couple after half time my spies tell me he might be a chance to help out the Creeks rucking division this year

by **jackpot jim** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:53 pm

Wouldn't be a bloke called Hill would it?

by **FootyMad** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:33 am

the saint wrote:
Newman wrote:Your stupidity is highlighted in your messages Saint. Who do you play for you wank, or do you just sit on the sidelines and make special comments.
Mate I would have played a lot more footy than you and I coach a side,what do you do Sidchrome

Pair of bitches! No I have , no I have.
Who gives a shit, if your going to bag eachother do it properly. That way we can all have a giggle!

Does Saint = Goolwa?

by **BJ Ernest** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:12 am

hill is ordinary, and stands about 6 ft if that and cant jump that high, going to struggle in ruck is thats the answer to the creeks height problem

by **limb** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:13 am

BJ Ernest wrote:hill is ordinary, and stands about 6 ft if that and cant jump that high, going to struggle in ruck is thats the answer to the creeks height problem

Big heart though...

by **BJ Ernest** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:40 am

im not sure that matters when it comes down to it in ruck.
if they pick up a ruckman who can take on the dominant rucks in the comp the creeks will be very hard to stop this year

by **FootyMad** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:26 pm

Speaking of Ruckmen both Encounter Bay and Strath have picked themselves up very good ruckmen for 2007.

by **FootyMad** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:34 pm

Report just in, Bays new forward out for 4-6 weeks with a torn driver! No Modra (to be seen), no Zwar hmmmm?

GSFL Movements

berri

Re: berri

Who is online

Around the place

GSFL Movements

berri

Re: berri

Who is online

Around the place

Join us