SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Grand Finalists for 2011

Broadview
1
2%
Flinders Park
9
19%
Gepps Cross
3
6%
Golden Grove
15
32%
Mawson Lakes
3
6%
Mitcham
0
No votes
Prince Alfred OC
7
15%
Salisbury
1
2%
SMOSH West Lakes
8
17%
 
Total votes : 47

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby RRR » Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:52 pm

hoareyy wrote:Maybe - although I think from the looks they've tried to get as many clubs with multiple teams at the same location. So the triple header for FP, Salisbury & SHOC as well as double headers with Kenilworth/Unley/SMOSH. Seems to have worked out pretty well - not everyone is going to be happy with every draw but at least this seems to have some thought behind it.

Yeah for you blokes.
Why not have the triple header at Hope Valley? Only 15 mins max. for Flinders Park to go watch their other 3 sides at Kilburn after their game. Not to mention the 2 other teams in the Div 7 GF's are North of the city also.[/quote]
agreed it's a massive hike considering we havnt played out that way all year!! with the fact of all three other teams being in grand final it'll mean bugger all supporters down there!![/quote]

I dont understand, what do u want 4 teams at the same venue? Unfortunately the amount of sunlight we get on a Septembers day (unless u wanna start at 815am) means that 1 of your sides will be playing in competition to another. Kudos to FP for having 4 sides in the GF by the way.[/quote]
not that mate more the fact of a ground a little closer would have been handy!![/quote]

Its only 20 mins away ;)
Anyway beside the point, think the saafl were hand tied with the amount of available ovals, hence the triple headers where they could.
RRR
Rookie
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:44 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby finn » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:00 pm

RRR wrote:
hoareyy wrote:Maybe - although I think from the looks they've tried to get as many clubs with multiple teams at the same location. So the triple header for FP, Salisbury & SHOC as well as double headers with Kenilworth/Unley/SMOSH. Seems to have worked out pretty well - not everyone is going to be happy with every draw but at least this seems to have some thought behind it.

Yeah for you blokes.
Why not have the triple header at Hope Valley? Only 15 mins max. for Flinders Park to go watch their other 3 sides at Kilburn after their game. Not to mention the 2 other teams in the Div 7 GF's are North of the city also.

agreed it's a massive hike considering we havnt played out that way all year!! with the fact of all three other teams being in grand final it'll mean bugger all supporters down there!![/quote]

I dont understand, what do u want 4 teams at the same venue? Unfortunately the amount of sunlight we get on a Septembers day (unless u wanna start at 815am) means that 1 of your sides will be playing in competition to another. Kudos to FP for having 4 sides in the GF by the way.[/quote]
not that mate more the fact of a ground a little closer would have been handy!![/quote]

Its only 20 mins away ;)
Anyway beside the point, think the saafl were hand tied with the amount of available ovals, hence the triple headers where they could.[/quote]

and it's only 20 minutes away for shoc then too...
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby TEX07 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:05 pm

We played against SHOC at St Marys this year, isn't that one of their home grounds? Or was that just for that week? would have thought that the C3 and C6 GFs could have been played together though but I guess it looks like oval availability was an issue.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby double-blue » Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:10 pm

TEX07 wrote:We played against SHOC at St Marys this year, isn't that one of their home grounds? Or was that just for that week? would have thought that the C3 and C6 GFs could have been played together though but I guess it looks like oval availability was an issue.


Nah, it's Kenilworths home ground. I think we just played there because the Middle School, Main Oval and Mitchel Park were all taken up - so we were left with the scraps!
double-blue
Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby TEX07 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:14 pm

double-blue wrote:
TEX07 wrote:We played against SHOC at St Marys this year, isn't that one of their home grounds? Or was that just for that week? would have thought that the C3 and C6 GFs could have been played together though but I guess it looks like oval availability was an issue.


Nah, it's Kenilworths home ground. I think we just played there because the Middle School, Main Oval and Mitchel Park were all taken up - so we were left with the scraps!


Thought as much, cheers.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby bar20 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:16 am

hoareyy wrote:
DKL wrote:
double-blue wrote:
hoareyy wrote:cant say anyone at flinders is gonna be happy with the grand final location 3 of our teams playing at kilburn and the d grade on the other side of town!! dont see why our c's and d's cant be at the same ground!!! SHOCKING!!!


Maybe - although I think from the looks they've tried to get as many clubs with multiple teams at the same location. So the triple header for FP, Salisbury & SHOC as well as double headers with Kenilworth/Unley/SMOSH. Seems to have worked out pretty well - not everyone is going to be happy with every draw but at least this seems to have some thought behind it.

Yeah for you blokes.
Why not have the triple header at Hope Valley? Only 15 mins max. for Flinders Park to go watch their other 3 sides at Kilburn after their game. Not to mention the 2 other teams in the Div 7 GF's are North of the city also.

agreed it's a massive hike considering we havnt played out that way all year!! with the fact of all three other teams being in grand final it'll mean bugger all supporters down there!!


Would have thought the C3 and C6 sides would be kept together considering they have all year
bar20
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:31 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby Reilly » Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:27 pm

C6 GF been changed to Payneham Oval.
Reilly
Member
 
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 3:46 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby TEX07 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:09 am

Best of luck to FP on Saturday, IMO will win this one and do it easily. Sorry SHOC boys but if you say that you needed some back last week to help out with numbers you will need a full bench to compete with FP. In all honesty, even with the side that you guys had last week FP would still win the game (again IMO) they would have to be the quickest, fittest and strongest D grade side I have seen or played against. Pretty good effort from both clubs to have all sides still playing this week! Even at this level fittness is a massive key, both FP and SHOC had this and in the end separated them from the rest.
Good luck to both sides but as I said FP is my tip by 40+.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby 1 club » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:54 pm

TEX07 wrote:Best of luck to FP on Saturday, IMO will win this one and do it easily. Sorry SHOC boys but if you say that you needed some back last week to help out with numbers you will need a full bench to compete with FP. In all honesty, even with the side that you guys had last week FP would still win the game (again IMO) they would have to be the quickest, fittest and strongest D grade side I have seen or played against. Pretty good effort from both clubs to have all sides still playing this week! Even at this level fittness is a massive key, both FP and SHOC had this and in the end separated them from the rest.
Good luck to both sides but as I said FP is my tip by 40+.


I too wish fp all the best for tomorrow,great effort from shoc for making gf especially as they came into comp late even if they did get alittle help from their higher grades last week.With shoc's div1r side straight threw to the gf does that mean they can push players down to div7 and then so on,if thats the case then shoc may field the same side as last week?Your right about flinders ds being fit when i played c and ds was all old fellas just having a kick but from what ive seen this year they would beat alot of teams in higher grades,they have a good mix of old and young guys and i think they should win tomorrow by around 5 to 6 goals.Spewing the games so early means that i have to get up early to get out there and watch hopefully its a good game.Bad luck TEX07 on not making gf i thought you guys were certain to be there and i know parks also thought they would be playing against you guys but ive also lost finals to sides that have stacked their teams and its not right,hopefully parks can knock off shoc and pay them back for you
1 club
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby 1 club » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:06 pm

Is it true its going to cost $10 to watch the c6 final tomorrow,surely the saafl are having a lend of us what a crock looks like we will be jumping the fence at payneham tomorrow,hope clubs keep beer and bbq prices the same and dont jump on the price rise this is ameuter league not sanfl
1 club
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby TEX07 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:13 pm

1 club wrote:
TEX07 wrote:Best of luck to FP on Saturday, IMO will win this one and do it easily. Sorry SHOC boys but if you say that you needed some back last week to help out with numbers you will need a full bench to compete with FP. In all honesty, even with the side that you guys had last week FP would still win the game (again IMO) they would have to be the quickest, fittest and strongest D grade side I have seen or played against. Pretty good effort from both clubs to have all sides still playing this week! Even at this level fittness is a massive key, both FP and SHOC had this and in the end separated them from the rest.
Good luck to both sides but as I said FP is my tip by 40+.


I too wish fp all the best for tomorrow,great effort from shoc for making gf especially as they came into comp late even if they did get alittle help from their higher grades last week.With shoc's div1r side straight threw to the gf does that mean they can push players down to div7 and then so on,if thats the case then shoc may field the same side as last week?Your right about flinders ds being fit when i played c and ds was all old fellas just having a kick but from what ive seen this year they would beat alot of teams in higher grades,they have a good mix of old and young guys and i think they should win tomorrow by around 5 to 6 goals.Spewing the games so early means that i have to get up early to get out there and watch hopefully its a good game.Bad luck TEX07 on not making gf i thought you guys were certain to be there and i know parks also thought they would be playing against you guys but ive also lost finals to sides that have stacked their teams and its not right,hopefully parks can knock off shoc and pay them back for you


Dont get me wrong I hated the fact that SHOC were able to play players down to help out but it is within the rules so its the way it is, I have said before its the rules I dont like not the clubs that follow them. I think that it will be a fairly large night out at FP tomorrow night because I think that they are a huge chance of getting all 4 GFs! Good thing about footy is there is always next year, those next years are starting to get less and less though ;)
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby 1 club » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:57 pm

whats the rule on playing more than 1 game per day shoc have 3 sides playing at the same ground.I see they name 25 in their d grade but only 22 in div7r and 23 in div7,can players go up and play more than 1 game if they sat on the bench for a while or are fresh enough to play again?can anyone fill me in i would have thought you could only play in the 1 gf?Why wouldnt they name full squads in their higher grades just incase of injuries?div7 and div7r is way more important than c6
1 club
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby bandar » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:05 pm

They have named full sides plus an emergency in D7.

22 is the full squad forD7 and D7R
User avatar
bandar
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:47 am
Location: Displaced
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 27 times
Grassroots Team: PHOS Camden

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby 1 club » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:19 pm

bandar wrote:They have named full sides plus an emergency in D7.

22 is the full squad forD7 and D7R

:oops: thanks for that didnt know the rules as when i played it was only 22 for each grade AS,Bs,Cs or Ds so wasnt up to scratch with it all
1 club
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:40 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby The Informer » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:53 pm

TEX07 wrote:
1 club wrote:
TEX07 wrote:Best of luck to FP on Saturday, IMO will win this one and do it easily. Sorry SHOC boys but if you say that you needed some back last week to help out with numbers you will need a full bench to compete with FP. In all honesty, even with the side that you guys had last week FP would still win the game (again IMO) they would have to be the quickest, fittest and strongest D grade side I have seen or played against. Pretty good effort from both clubs to have all sides still playing this week! Even at this level fittness is a massive key, both FP and SHOC had this and in the end separated them from the rest.
Good luck to both sides but as I said FP is my tip by 40+.


I too wish fp all the best for tomorrow,great effort from shoc for making gf especially as they came into comp late even if they did get alittle help from their higher grades last week.With shoc's div1r side straight threw to the gf does that mean they can push players down to div7 and then so on,if thats the case then shoc may field the same side as last week?Your right about flinders ds being fit when i played c and ds was all old fellas just having a kick but from what ive seen this year they would beat alot of teams in higher grades,they have a good mix of old and young guys and i think they should win tomorrow by around 5 to 6 goals.Spewing the games so early means that i have to get up early to get out there and watch hopefully its a good game.Bad luck TEX07 on not making gf i thought you guys were certain to be there and i know parks also thought they would be playing against you guys but ive also lost finals to sides that have stacked their teams and its not right,hopefully parks can knock off shoc and pay them back for you


Dont get me wrong I hated the fact that SHOC were able to play players down to help out but it is within the rules so its the way it is, I have said before its the rules I dont like not the clubs that follow them. I think that it will be a fairly large night out at FP tomorrow night because I think that they are a huge chance of getting all 4 GFs! Good thing about footy is there is always next year, those next years are starting to get less and less though ;)


I think if you look thru SHOCs teams they have about 3 or 4 guys who played mostly Div1 R all season playing in the Div 7 grand final 2m. So looks like you will see the same C6 team from SHOC
The Informer
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:17 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby bandar » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:56 pm

There is one bloke that played 6 or so Div 1 games in the Div 7 side.
User avatar
bandar
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:47 am
Location: Displaced
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 27 times
Grassroots Team: PHOS Camden

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby The Informer » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:58 pm

bandar wrote:There is one bloke that played 6 or so Div 1 games in the Div 7 side.


From what i have been told there is a couple of guys who only played 3 or 4 div 7 games, the rest were in Div1R.

What bloke you talking about?
The Informer
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:17 pm
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby White Unicorn » Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:07 pm

The_Informer wrote:
bandar wrote:There is one bloke that played 6 or so Div 1 games in the Div 7 side.


From what i have been told there is a couple of guys who only played 3 or 4 div 7 games, the rest were in Div1R.

What bloke you talking about?


Lads, all teams were picked on merit lets just stop the presumptions. B grade picked a 22 that will play next week (depends obviously if a grade win and injuries), then the rest were picked in lower grades. Results in no player missing out on a GF unless not picked for E grade.
White Unicorn
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby TEX07 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:22 pm

White Unicorn wrote:
The_Informer wrote:
bandar wrote:There is one bloke that played 6 or so Div 1 games in the Div 7 side.


From what i have been told there is a couple of guys who only played 3 or 4 div 7 games, the rest were in Div1R.

What bloke you talking about?


Lads, all teams were picked on merit lets just stop the presumptions. B grade picked a 22 that will play next week (depends obviously if a grade win and injuries), then the rest were picked in lower grades. Results in no player missing out on a GF unless not picked for E grade.


You keep telling yourself that! I would hate to be the bloke that misses out on a GF right down the bottom while some guys will play in 2! Why cant you just come out and say, yep we want to win every GF we play in and we will drop players down to do this, you can pick whatever side you want for your Div1 R side still wont change the players who will play in your Div7 side. If what the others are saying here are true that you have a guy that was good enough to get 6 games in div 1 playing in div 7 tomorrow it is exactly my point all along, the rule is dumb and although SHOC are using it within them I dont think it is what the rule was made for. Maybe SHOC will do a bit better against FP than I thought.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: SAAFL Div C6 (2011)

Postby double-blue » Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:27 pm

TEX07 wrote:
White Unicorn wrote:
The_Informer wrote:
bandar wrote:There is one bloke that played 6 or so Div 1 games in the Div 7 side.


From what i have been told there is a couple of guys who only played 3 or 4 div 7 games, the rest were in Div1R.

What bloke you talking about?


Lads, all teams were picked on merit lets just stop the presumptions. B grade picked a 22 that will play next week (depends obviously if a grade win and injuries), then the rest were picked in lower grades. Results in no player missing out on a GF unless not picked for E grade.


You keep telling yourself that! I would hate to be the bloke that misses out on a GF right down the bottom while some guys will play in 2! Why cant you just come out and say, yep we want to win every GF we play in and we will drop players down to do this, you can pick whatever side you want for your Div1 R side still wont change the players who will play in your Div7 side. If what the others are saying here are true that you have a guy that was good enough to get 6 games in div 1 playing in div 7 tomorrow it is exactly my point all along, the rule is dumb and although SHOC are using it within them I dont think it is what the rule was made for. Maybe SHOC will do a bit better against FP than I thought.


I really don't get what you think we have done?

There are guys who played in the final last week against Angle Vale in Div7 who aren't playing tomorrow because they were promoted to the B grade this week. Now if we were really doing something dodgy wouldn't they still be playing in the C grade tomorrow??

The rule is fine as it is - it stops teams from stacking on the lower end if one of their higher grades is knocked out. In our case all it means is that we can pick our strongest team in each grade. If we had to worry about guys being qualified for each team then all of a sudden guys who weren't picked in the B grade wouldn't be getting a game at all as they couldn't be dropped down a division.
double-blue
Member
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Sacred Heart OC

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |