by Wedgie » Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:56 pm
wide receiver wrote:Woodville-West Torrens: 1,471
North Adelaide: 1,428
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Ian » Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:37 pm
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:01 pm
by westside » Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:56 am
by Spiritof64 » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:00 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
by Rushby Hinds » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:04 am
Spiritof64 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
Divide the legs by 2 to get actual total.
by westside » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:47 am
Borat wrote:Spiritof64 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
Divide the legs by 2 to get actual total.
I'd say the above figure would be correct. I have wondered for a few years how Norwood allways gets a much larger membership sign up compared to the Bays, both have had similar "success" and probably a similar number of fans. Without looking, I think the Bays had more people at their games last year then Norwood.
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:36 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dog_ger » Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:01 pm
by JK » Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:35 pm
Spiritof64 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
Divide the legs by 2 to get actual total.
by JK » Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:37 pm
Borat wrote:Spiritof64 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
Divide the legs by 2 to get actual total.
I'd say the above figure would be correct. I have wondered for a few years how Norwood allways gets a much larger membership sign up compared to the Bays, both have had similar "success" and probably a similar number of fans. Without looking, I think the Bays had more people at their games last year then Norwood.
by MST » Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:36 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Borat wrote:Spiritof64 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
Divide the legs by 2 to get actual total.
I'd say the above figure would be correct. I have wondered for a few years how Norwood allways gets a much larger membership sign up compared to the Bays, both have had similar "success" and probably a similar number of fans. Without looking, I think the Bays had more people at their games last year then Norwood.
LOL .. Excuse me??
Perhaps the Bays have a lot more cheapskates who won't back their club?
by JK » Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:44 pm
MST wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Borat wrote:Spiritof64 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Legs somewhere between 1400-1500 a coupla weeks ago I believe
Divide the legs by 2 to get actual total.
I'd say the above figure would be correct. I have wondered for a few years how Norwood allways gets a much larger membership sign up compared to the Bays, both have had similar "success" and probably a similar number of fans. Without looking, I think the Bays had more people at their games last year then Norwood.
LOL .. Excuse me??
Perhaps the Bays have a lot more cheapskates who won't back their club?
Yeah, I had to giggle when I read that little pearl!
Norwood's 27 odd flags compared to the Bays 4 (or is it three?)............
With that being said, Norwood won most of their premierships in the early to mid 1900's and one of the modern day triumphs was handed to them on a silver platter by Des Foster
by MST » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:01 pm
by JK » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:04 pm
by Dan The Man » Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:39 pm
wide receiver wrote:Port 2,030
North 1,910
Eagles 1,777
Glenelg 1,069
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |