What a ******* joke

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/afl-to-announce-mcginnity-penalty/story-e6frecjc-1226115727485
by Dirko » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:20 pm
by dedja » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:28 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:40 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:52 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:28 am
CoverKing wrote:No idea what he said but I think it's fair. IMO not even close to racially abusing someone, so the one week fine and public hummiliation is worth it.
Although I still don't understand why these people don't get three strikes in similar circumstances before they are named publicly
by CoverKing » Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:37 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:CoverKing wrote:No idea what he said but I think it's fair. IMO not even close to racially abusing someone, so the one week fine and public hummiliation is worth it.
Although I still don't understand why these people don't get three strikes in similar circumstances before they are named publicly
agree, yet other hawcough players can get multiple unamed strikes and after a certain amount of years they're cleared to start again in their offending.
by wristwatcher » Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:42 am
by Booney » Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:58 am
wristwatcher wrote:I disagree. For what he said he needed at least a week. Im guessing that a lot of you dont know exactly what he said but when you read tomorrows paper you will see this kind of sledging needs to be severly dealt with.
The R word should never be used on a football field.
by CK » Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:24 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:11 am
CK wrote:Correct, wristwatcher. What actually was said, does not belong in any environment, and many blokes would react similarly if it was said to them.
by Barto » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:18 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:CK wrote:Correct, wristwatcher. What actually was said, does not belong in any environment, and many blokes would react similarly if it was said to them.
Well what was "allegedly" said?
by Brodlach » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:29 am
Barto wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:CK wrote:Correct, wristwatcher. What actually was said, does not belong in any environment, and many blokes would react similarly if it was said to them.
Well what was "allegedly" said?
The he was going to rape Petterd's mother.
Pretty full on stuff, it's not like McGinnity said that his mum wears army boots.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by JK » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:33 am
by Booney » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:41 am
JK wrote:Im still more in shock over the 50m penalty against Hudson .. I agree that if Patmac used the R toward a family member he deserved punishment - Pity Petterd wasnt able to hand out his own form of justice.
by Q. » Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:57 am
by JK » Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:00 am
Quichey wrote:If Pettard had lost it and beat the **** out of McGinnity, I wonder how things would have panned out at the tribunal for Petterd?
by test » Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:03 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:46 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |