by Squawk » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:45 am
by heater31 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:18 am
by Sojourner » Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:13 pm
by robranisgod » Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:22 pm
Sojourner wrote:Is this why the CDFC and the NAFC dont seem to get along so well?
From the linked article,
"Not all SANFL Clubs were in favour of the submission. After strong lobbying from Thomas Seymour-Hill and Jack Forrester from North Adelaide the Central District and Woodville submissions were accepted only on the proviso that they serve a 5 year probationary period (1959 to 1963) in B-grade before being admitted into the SANFL competition in 1964."
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:49 pm
by CENTURION » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:08 pm
dedja wrote:On a slightly different but semantic related theme ...
For as long as I can remember, I have always called them Central, obviously short for Central District, and never Centrals ... but it seems that Central with an 's' is the preferred name, used by the club and even on it's own scoreboard.
Similar to Walker Flat on the Murray, which is usually mis-pronounced Walkers Flat, I've always considered to addition of the 's' to be a mis-nomer.
Am I alone ... does anyone else care?
by CENTURION » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:09 pm
Sojourner wrote:Is this why the CDFC and the NAFC dont seem to get along so well?
From the linked article,
"Not all SANFL Clubs were in favour of the submission. After strong lobbying from Thomas Seymour-Hill and Jack Forrester from North Adelaide the Central District and Woodville submissions were accepted only on the proviso that they serve a 5 year probationary period (1959 to 1963) in B-grade before being admitted into the SANFL competition in 1964."
by heater31 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:32 pm
CENTURION wrote:yes....and no. but I will play along, Smithfield Plain is another.
by CENTURION » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:36 pm
heater31 wrote:CENTURION wrote:yes....and no. but I will play along, Smithfield Plain is another.
Sorry to bust your bubble, but why then "Smithfield Plains" appear in official Government Maps??
I think with most things people shorten things to end with a y or s
by Dissident » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:08 pm
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:10 pm
by CK » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:35 pm
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:43 pm
by Dissident » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:50 pm
by robranisgod » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:13 pm
Dissident wrote:It's very old school, with the S.
I remember my grandpa always calling Port Adelaide "ports" and Sturt "sturts".
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:38 pm
CK wrote:I must admit, and it's probably very pedantic, but I am very picky about referring to them as Central District (without the S in the latter - and DistrictS crops up a LOT in some circles), much as I tend to be about referring to the club Woodville/West Torrens, rather than the Eagles. More so the historical side of me, I suppose.
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:41 pm
robranisgod wrote:Dissident wrote:It's very old school, with the S.
I remember my grandpa always calling Port Adelaide "ports" and Sturt "sturts".
Most people that I know always refer to Ports, Norths, Souths, Sturts but never Wests always Westies.
by spell_check » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:53 pm
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:55 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:23 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |