by Q. » Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:34 pm
by Psyber » Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:34 pm
Yes, but I'd still argue a trading scheme will not by itself reduce emissions, just add a cost.Quichey wrote:China are introducing a carbon emissions trading scheme though.
We emit over four times as much carbon per capita than China, and are a nation with one of the strongest economies in the world, yet we still refuse to make changes.
by straight talker » Fri Jul 22, 2011 9:39 pm
by Q. » Fri Jul 22, 2011 9:50 pm
by straight talker » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:03 pm
by Q. » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:06 pm
straight talker wrote:ok it will make a difference!! did you get this graph from mr Flannery or mr Garnaut?? or maybe Al Gore??
by straight talker » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:15 pm
by Q. » Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:44 pm
by redandblack » Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:31 am
by dedja » Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:58 am
by Psyber » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:17 am
It does look like the projection of an optimist to me.Quichey wrote:It's actually from an article in The Economist, imploring the British government to adopt a similar carbon pricing scheme.straight talker wrote:ok it will make a difference!! did you get this graph from mr Flannery or mr Garnaut?? or maybe Al Gore??
by redandblack » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:22 am
by straight talker » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:19 pm
by GWW » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:39 pm
straight talker wrote:prices rise again!!
by straight talker » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:46 pm
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:50 pm
by straight talker » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:55 pm
by dedja » Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:57 pm
straight talker wrote:Labor told the people of Australia that the price of inflation would be kept low?? now the price rise has begun and the consumer will be paying big time. More Labor spin!!
by straight talker » Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:10 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |