cennals05 wrote:This smells of someone with a vendetta against a certain club because of certain comments made about them by the club. Wonder who that could be??
Is "vendetta" an Italian word? Sorry off topic.
by sjt » Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:58 pm
cennals05 wrote:This smells of someone with a vendetta against a certain club because of certain comments made about them by the club. Wonder who that could be??
by Adelaide Hawk » Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:58 pm
SANFLnut wrote:Let's wait and see whether this is true and the magnitude of the breach, however , if the SANFL do dish out a penalty let's make sure it is handled better than the Norwood penalty that banned them from recruiting during the off season but allowed them to sign players before the season started.
by whufc » Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:03 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:SANFLnut wrote:Let's wait and see whether this is true and the magnitude of the breach, however , if the SANFL do dish out a penalty let's make sure it is handled better than the Norwood penalty that banned them from recruiting during the off season but allowed them to sign players before the season started.
Just for once, think it through. When do you sign the majority of your recruits, and certainly the better ones? That's right ... pre-season, not after the season begins, when salary caps are finalised, etc. Effectively Norwood were unable to recruit for an entire season. Got that straight?
by CENTURION » Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:15 pm
sjt wrote:cennals05 wrote:This smells of someone with a vendetta against a certain club because of certain comments made about them by the club. Wonder who that could be??
Is "vendetta" an Italian word? Sorry off topic.
by staritski » Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:32 pm
by JK » Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:32 pm
whufc wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:SANFLnut wrote:Let's wait and see whether this is true and the magnitude of the breach, however , if the SANFL do dish out a penalty let's make sure it is handled better than the Norwood penalty that banned them from recruiting during the off season but allowed them to sign players before the season started.
Just for once, think it through. When do you sign the majority of your recruits, and certainly the better ones? That's right ... pre-season, not after the season begins, when salary caps are finalised, etc. Effectively Norwood were unable to recruit for an entire season. Got that straight?
Wasnt it players werent allowed to sign until after a certain date. That didnt mean they couldnt approach players and so forth and then sign after the imposed date.
What were the Norwoods Ins thats season.
Im not fussed about there penalty as it didnt effect Central performance but would be interested to hear the exact details.
by Brucetiki » Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:59 pm
by bayman » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:05 pm
by nickname » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:11 pm
goraw wrote:darren chandler catagorically stated no team is under investigation, on 5AA about 10 minutes ago.
by CENTURION » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:18 pm
staritski wrote:please, please be the case- man what a crack up that would be!
by Brucetiki » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:20 pm
staritski wrote:please, please be the case- man what a crack up that would be!
by smac » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:20 pm
Brucetiki wrote:I hope Centrals sues for defamation and takes Cornes and 5AA to the cleaners over this. Given the Cornes' are quick to cry defamation for less, be good to give them a taste of their own medicine.
Good to see the SANFL put Cornes back in his box for once.
by bayman » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:21 pm
by Brucetiki » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:23 pm
smac wrote:Brucetiki wrote:I hope Centrals sues for defamation and takes Cornes and 5AA to the cleaners over this. Given the Cornes' are quick to cry defamation for less, be good to give them a taste of their own medicine.
Good to see the SANFL put Cornes back in his box for once.
Given his strong show of support for the SANFL a little while back, the hopefulness in his voice followed by the despair after speaking with Chandler, it can only be put down to jealousy. Hardly worth concerning yourself over, the issue is his and no one elses.
by cennals05 » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:25 pm
smac wrote:Brucetiki wrote:I hope Centrals sues for defamation and takes Cornes and 5AA to the cleaners over this. Given the Cornes' are quick to cry defamation for less, be good to give them a taste of their own medicine.
Good to see the SANFL put Cornes back in his box for once.
Given his strong show of support for the SANFL a little while back, the hopefulness in his voice followed by the despair after speaking with Chandler, it can only be put down to jealousy. Hardly worth concerning yourself over, the issue is his and no one elses.
by CENTURION » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:26 pm
Brucetiki wrote:smac wrote:Brucetiki wrote:I hope Centrals sues for defamation and takes Cornes and 5AA to the cleaners over this. Given the Cornes' are quick to cry defamation for less, be good to give them a taste of their own medicine.
Good to see the SANFL put Cornes back in his box for once.
Given his strong show of support for the SANFL a little while back, the hopefulness in his voice followed by the despair after speaking with Chandler, it can only be put down to jealousy. Hardly worth concerning yourself over, the issue is his and no one elses.
True but the club could do with the money - we could fund the light tower redevelopment with the settlement
by smac » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:27 pm
by doggies4eva » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:31 pm
CENTURION wrote:Brucetiki wrote:smac wrote:Brucetiki wrote:I hope Centrals sues for defamation and takes Cornes and 5AA to the cleaners over this. Given the Cornes' are quick to cry defamation for less, be good to give them a taste of their own medicine.
Good to see the SANFL put Cornes back in his box for once.
Given his strong show of support for the SANFL a little while back, the hopefulness in his voice followed by the despair after speaking with Chandler, it can only be put down to jealousy. Hardly worth concerning yourself over, the issue is his and no one elses.
True but the club could do with the money - we could fund the light tower redevelopment with the settlement
yep, about $80,000, what Pam receiveth, Graham giveth away.
by topsywaldron » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:36 pm
by CENTURION » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:37 pm
topsywaldron wrote:John Condon, that fearless fighter for the truth, once turned up at Elizabeth Oval and was greeted by three QCs.
That's where the light globe money went.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |