Booney wrote:If I were to look for "excuses" it would mean I give a **** as to what you think.Guess I dont need to look.
If you didnt care.
Why respond ????
Was it purely ego ??? or guilty conscience ???
maybe a combination of both ???
by Mopar Dog » Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:55 pm
Booney wrote:If I were to look for "excuses" it would mean I give a **** as to what you think.Guess I dont need to look.
by Booney » Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:00 pm
by Mopar Dog » Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:09 pm
Booney wrote:Just trying to get a better understanding of how you establish the criteria for being a "traditional / loyal" football supporter and why you see it that way.
Dont get me wrong mate, I cant stand the Crows and most people who follow them but many of them are very loyal traditional football supporters. I think your views are a little narrow, thats all.
by Footy Smart » Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:43 pm
Mopar Dog wrote:Booney wrote:Just trying to get a better understanding of how you establish the criteria for being a "traditional / loyal" football supporter and why you see it that way.
Dont get me wrong mate, I cant stand the Crows and most people who follow them but many of them are very loyal traditional football supporters. I think your views are a little narrow, thats all.
I think you have simply misunderstood my point.
As stated numerously many crows fans are loyal/traditional. The majority arent. I am talking about a percentage of crows fans. Its just cleary NOT ALL are loyal traditional fans and I believe this as WHUFC as pointed out. Is why the club is in its current predicament.
BTW have you seen the AFC's crowd figures/and heard the excuses for poor crowd figures. Over the last 4-5 seasons havent you ????
They are laughable.
by cripple » Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:49 pm
Mopar Dog wrote:Booney wrote:Just trying to get a better understanding of how you establish the criteria for being a "traditional / loyal" football supporter and why you see it that way.
Dont get me wrong mate, I cant stand the Crows and most people who follow them but many of them are very loyal traditional football supporters. I think your views are a little narrow, thats all.
I think you have simply misunderstood my point.
As stated numerously many crows fans are loyal/traditional. The majority arent. I am talking about a percentage of crows fans. Its just cleary NOT ALL are loyal traditional fans and I believe this as WHUFC as pointed out. Is why the club is in its current predicament.
BTW have you seen the AFC's crowd figures/and heard the excuses for poor crowd figures. Over the last 4-5 seasons havent you ????
They are laughable.
by Mopar Dog » Fri Jul 15, 2011 4:52 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Mopar Dog wrote:Booney wrote:Just trying to get a better understanding of how you establish the criteria for being a "traditional / loyal" football supporter and why you see it that way.
Dont get me wrong mate, I cant stand the Crows and most people who follow them but many of them are very loyal traditional football supporters. I think your views are a little narrow, thats all.
I think you have simply misunderstood my point.
As stated numerously many crows fans are loyal/traditional. The majority arent. I am talking about a percentage of crows fans. Its just cleary NOT ALL are loyal traditional fans and I believe this as WHUFC as pointed out. Is why the club is in its current predicament.
BTW have you seen the AFC's crowd figures/and heard the excuses for poor crowd figures. Over the last 4-5 seasons havent you ????
They are laughable.
These 'excuses' is not only AFC applicable and apply to the Power also..... Ive been told by Power supporters that they wont go to AAMI because its "to cold and windy" your points are thin Mopar, give up!
by Mopar Dog » Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:01 pm
cripple wrote:Mopar Dog wrote:Booney wrote:Just trying to get a better understanding of how you establish the criteria for being a "traditional / loyal" football supporter and why you see it that way.
Dont get me wrong mate, I cant stand the Crows and most people who follow them but many of them are very loyal traditional football supporters. I think your views are a little narrow, thats all.
I think you have simply misunderstood my point.
As stated numerously many crows fans are loyal/traditional. The majority arent. I am talking about a percentage of crows fans. Its just cleary NOT ALL are loyal traditional fans and I believe this as WHUFC as pointed out. Is why the club is in its current predicament.
BTW have you seen the AFC's crowd figures/and heard the excuses for poor crowd figures. Over the last 4-5 seasons havent you ????
They are laughable.
This is becoming ridiculous. The majoirity of all football supporters are neither loyal or traditional going by your definitions and ideas. Taking Collingwood as an example, the consistently get 60,000+ supporters to most games. This 60,000 would be a small percentage of the million+ collingwood supporters that exist. The same theory can be applied to any SANFL club who may get 5,000 to most games yet in all likely hood can claim the support of 100,000 people around Adelaide (assuming most people in SA claim a SANFL club).
So if you are only talking about a percentage of crows fans, expect some criticism because all clubs have a large percentage of fans who are neither loyal nor traditonal.
by Mad Mat » Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:02 pm
by Mopar Dog » Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:19 pm
Mad Mat wrote:As stated numerously many crows fans are loyal/traditional. [b]The majority arent. [/b]I am talking about a percentage of crows fans. Its just cleary NOT ALL are loyal traditional fans and I believe this as WHUFC as pointed out. Is why the club is in its current predicament.
Hang on, in the first sentence you're saying many crows fans are loyal/traditional, but then in the next sentence you say the majority aren't?![]()
The next sentence it's back to 'NOT ALL are loyal traditional fans' as opposed to the majority in the previous sentence? Call me crazy but I'm guessing that every club has fans who are NOT ALL loyal, traditional fans. Show me any club that sits in the bottom 4-5 at this stage of the season with no hope of playing in the finals that has crowd figures that aren't in decline. Every club goes through it.
You should recognise that being a Dogs supporter.
by cripple » Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:02 pm
by Mopar Dog » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:41 am
cripple wrote:Wishful thinking, songs from before my time and i am not entirely sure what you mean by it.
by cripple » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:59 am
by Jimmy » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:10 am
by bayman » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:33 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:42 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:46 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:06 am
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:32 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:I hope she takes her top off.
by smac » Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:25 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:I hope she takes her top off.
by bayman » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:01 pm
smac wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:I hope she takes her top off.
Half off - keep it covering her face.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |