by Gowser » Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:20 pm
by THE BOSS » Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:01 am
by Gowser » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:43 pm
THE BOSS wrote:Even Keswick aren't up there with WYC, alright they did beat them a few weeks ago but all good sides have a bad day and Keswick were lucky enough to get that bad day, WYC won't let that happen again.
Keep an eye on WOS, there playing some good cricket at the moment.
by VC » Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:01 pm
THE BOSS wrote:VC - 6 down in the second innings, a lead of 80 odd, didn't you give yourselves enough overs to bowl them out.
D Hibberd 150 odd must have been good to watch ?
WYC v ICC - WYC to win easy.
KESWICK v WOS - Keswick in a close one.
And then WYC to win flag.
What do you reckon guy's.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:54 pm
by VC » Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:03 am
Rik E Boy wrote:I have to say I feel a bit sorry for anyone trying to get Colin Tuckwell out in Section five (North Haven III). He is one of the best players I have played against and he would be a nightmare in the fives.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:24 am
VC wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:I have to say I feel a bit sorry for anyone trying to get Colin Tuckwell out in Section five (North Haven III). He is one of the best players I have played against and he would be a nightmare in the fives.
regards,
REB
if he's so good, why is he playin 5's when his side is struggling in section 1?
by oxa » Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:48 pm
by smithy » Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:17 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:VC wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:I have to say I feel a bit sorry for anyone trying to get Colin Tuckwell out in Section five (North Haven III). He is one of the best players I have played against and he would be a nightmare in the fives.
regards,
REB
if he's so good, why is he playin 5's when his side is struggling in section 1?
Don't know VC. He's not a spring chicken anymore, maybe he has had enough of playing A Grade cricket and he just wants to have a quiet game and a few beers afterwards. He's got nothing to prove believe me.
regards,
REB
by VC » Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:37 pm
smithy wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:VC wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:I have to say I feel a bit sorry for anyone trying to get Colin Tuckwell out in Section five (North Haven III). He is one of the best players I have played against and he would be a nightmare in the fives.
regards,
REB
if he's so good, why is he playin 5's when his side is struggling in section 1?
Don't know VC. He's not a spring chicken anymore, maybe he has had enough of playing A Grade cricket and he just wants to have a quiet game and a few beers afterwards. He's got nothing to prove believe me.
regards,
thats exactly right smithy, thats wat i've heard too, hides from playin at the high levels...
REB
I always viewed him as a lower grade bully.
Good player, no doubt, but a few of us had the impression he didn't like the harder stuff in the 1's.
Spring chicken he isn't but even 10 years ago he was playing 2's for North Haven.
by THE BOSS » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:52 pm
by bay boy » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:48 pm
THE BOSS wrote:TUCKWELL- GLORY BOY !!
He is playing in the lower grades due to the fact that he held the record for the most runs in an innings at Nth Haven, until last year when it was broken, so he dropped down to the lower grades to try and get his record back again.
KESWICK v ICC in section 1, my tip, hopefully ICC !!!!!
by VC » Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:26 pm
by Tight_Lines » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:43 pm
by Gowser » Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:25 pm
Tight_Lines wrote:WYC what went wrong? I think that the way that Finals are played it doesnt really reward the teams that do finish one and two a home final isnt much really. My opinion I think they sould consider 1st VS 2nd Winner plays home GF 3rd VS 4th loser OUT winner plays away VS loser of 1 and 2 and then the winner plays away in The GF at least this way it gives teams that peform well during the season a reward for their position. Teams that sneak into 4th position shouldn't just win one game then suddenly have a chance at the big one if it was changed and a team that finished 4th made the GF then you could say that they generally earnt that right and just didnt have one lucky day.
by Tiger Couple » Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:06 am
by bay boy » Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:38 am
PUNTER wrote:Where is the Grand Final to be played? Is it a Neutral Ground or Highest ranked side hosts the game?
by bazza1 » Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:41 am
THE BOSS wrote:TUCKWELL- GLORY BOY !!
He is playing in the lower grades due to the fact that he held the record for the most runs in an innings at Nth Haven, until last year when it was broken, so he dropped down to the lower grades to try and get his record back again.
KESWICK v ICC in section 1, my tip, hopefully ICC !!!!!
by THE BOSS » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:44 pm
by bay boy » Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:41 pm
bazza1 wrote:THE BOSS wrote:TUCKWELL- GLORY BOY !!
He is playing in the lower grades due to the fact that he held the record for the most runs in an innings at Nth Haven, until last year when it was broken, so he dropped down to the lower grades to try and get his record back again.
KESWICK v ICC in section 1, my tip, hopefully ICC !!!!!
If you look on North Havens web site, (nhcc.org.au) you will see that tucky batted himself 4 times at number 5, once at 4, once at 3, once at 6 and once at 10, i dont know about you but if you were glory hunting you would be in the top 3 every week. Tucky has never played any lower than A grade, (other than unavailabe one week) in his time at North Haven.
Good luck Bay Boy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |