LEH wrote:Booney wrote:LEH wrote:csbowes...
I wonder if you would have the same view had YOUR club been FORCED to merge with North in the mid-90s?
You spend lots of time telling everyone how you are the WWT Eagles and get cranky at any mention of hybrids or merger, yet take almost every opportunity to go back to that time. No wonder you're still bitter.
I am surprised that you don't get it, Mal.
Let's say Port Magpies were forced to merge - for sake of argument, with West.
The merged entity is known as the West Adelaide Magpies.
Assuming you have NO interest in AFL, would YOU support the 'new' club or go & support Glenelg, Norwood, Centrals or one of the other clubs?
Would you have had me support one of the other 8 clubs?
I am against ALL FORCED MERGERS - in fact I supported Sturt's efforts to stand alone in the mid 90s, by contributing financially.
Ask a Fitzroy Fan if they are happy with what happened to their club in Melbourne - hang on, wasn't it said same club that caused their demise also?? Hmmm... call me a cynic but this is also the club that said, nay categorically stated they would have 35K+ every week to the footy.
How is PAFC any different to the basket case that Fitzroy were supposedly considered.
What annoys me most is people on here say things like... "spit the dummy", "caved in", "gave up", etc. when referring to West Torrens merging with Woodville. Let's be straight here, it was a FORCED MERGER because of the fear that the competition was going to die. Our $300 000 debt appears somewhat like 'chicken feed' compared to the MILLIONS that the SANFL are continually paying out to Port.
Does that make me bitter?
Damn Right!
This is completely off topic, but why do you keep calling Booney, Mal? that is twice now in this one thread isnt it? you do know they are different people right?