by nickname » Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:14 pm
by LPH » Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:56 pm
by Pseudo » Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:59 pm
by cripple » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:06 pm
LEH wrote:This is bound to happen here, particularly now the AFL will want control of PAFC.
Another reason NOT to move to Adelaide Oval.
The Crows Reserves side should play @ Footy Park, & the 'One-club' should play @ Alberton.
Spend money redeveloping both Footy Park & Alberton, forget the Adelaide Oval.
If you reckon this is not the bell tolling for the death of the SANFL, think again
by on the rails » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:18 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:19 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:23 pm
by LPH » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:32 pm
cripple wrote:LEH wrote:This is bound to happen here, particularly now the AFL will want control of PAFC.
Another reason NOT to move to Adelaide Oval.
The Crows Reserves side should play @ Footy Park, & the 'One-club' should play @ Alberton.
Spend money redeveloping both Footy Park & Alberton, forget the Adelaide Oval.
If you reckon this is not the bell tolling for the death of the SANFL, think again
what has this got to do with adelaide oval. let the port reserves play at alberton and the crows reserves can play away every week, as they are proposing in the wafl format.
by cripple » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:45 pm
LEH wrote:cripple wrote:LEH wrote:This is bound to happen here, particularly now the AFL will want control of PAFC.
Another reason NOT to move to Adelaide Oval.
The Crows Reserves side should play @ Footy Park, & the 'One-club' should play @ Alberton.
Spend money redeveloping both Footy Park & Alberton, forget the Adelaide Oval.
If you reckon this is not the bell tolling for the death of the SANFL, think again
what has this got to do with adelaide oval. let the port reserves play at alberton and the crows reserves can play away every week, as they are proposing in the wafl format.
Did you read the article, or did you just post a response to my post?
It stated in the article about the Eagles & Dockers reserves side playing @ a local BASE ground, revenue generated.
Port crying foul about 'the stadium deal' it has & the lack of revenue kept 'in house' - perfect solution, rejuvenate Alberton!
by redandblack » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:46 pm
on the rails wrote:It will happen for sure now the SANFL Commission and Executive (not the 8 clubs) have allowed Port to turn into a basket case whilst blaming everyone else except themselves. Anyhow it will be "bye bye magpies" if the reserves concept gets up! After all how many years can the 8 other clubs stomach the Magpies being funded by SANFL handouts and now AFL handouts? Didn't see the AFL offering to clear the debts of North, Sturt, West etc when we all hit hard times but the Magpies get another boost until they are killed off in a year or two or however long it will take to get the ressies up and running?
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:48 pm
by redandblack » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:50 pm
by CENTURION » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:55 pm
by heater31 » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:58 pm
CENTURION wrote:Why can't we just go back to the way things were.
by bayman » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:12 pm
CENTURION wrote:Why can't we just go back to the way things were.
by bayman » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:14 pm
by CENTURION » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:27 pm
bayman wrote:CENTURION wrote:Why can't we just go back to the way things were.
you wouldn't like that because port would still be winning flags & central not as many, seriously though one can only wish
by csbowes » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:29 pm
by Barto » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:35 pm
by Barto » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:38 pm
Pseudo wrote:I will NEVER attend a SANFL game featuring a dedicated AFL reserves side.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |