by csbowes » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:18 am
by csbowes » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:33 am
by LPH » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:16 am
by Booney » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:41 am
LEH wrote:csbowes...
I wonder if you would have the same view had YOUR club been FORCED to merge with North in the mid-90s?
by redandblack » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:55 am
by Booney » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:02 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:34 am
by Pseudo » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:12 am
on the rails wrote:I have read this thread with interest since since this story broke as well as "thepowerfromport" forums and "Adelaide Now" comments.
[... good stuff trimmed ...]
TIME TO ACT NOW before it is too late!
by Pseudo » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:14 am
Booney wrote:LEH wrote:csbowes...
I wonder if you would have the same view had YOUR club been FORCED to merge with North in the mid-90s?
You spend lots of time telling everyone how you are the WWT Eagles and get cranky at any mention of hybrids or merger, yet take almost every opportunity to go back to that time. No wonder you're still bitter.
by Pseudo » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:18 am
Booney wrote:Do you truly believe the SANFL would thrive if it were to be a stand alone competition with little influence from the AFL? For instance, if all support from the AFL was withdrawn in SA, from Auskick to SANFL league clubs, how would we fare here?
by redandblack » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:21 am
by Aerie » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:22 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:On The Rails, good post but it opens up more questions than it answers. I'd like to know more.
by Booney » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:32 am
redandblack wrote:
And how specifically would you have weaned the SANFL off the AFL-dollar teat, Pseudo.
And what major issues have the AFL affected the SANFL badly?
Genuinely interested.
by darley16 » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:35 am
by Aerie » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:49 am
darley16 wrote:To respond to ONR post of ACT NOW BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE all posters on this site should immediately email their respective clubs CEO's and ask,
"In light of recent event surrounding AFL involvement in Port Power:
1) What strategies are in place to protect the on-going viablity of both our club and the SANFL competition?
2) What collective actions are to be taken against media misrepresentation of the facts concerning the distribution of dividends from the 2 AFL clubs to SANFL clubs?
It's time to protest loudly and now to our clubs and the SANFL commission, maybe mods could start a site designated towards this end?
by oldfella » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:54 am
by Booney » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:56 am
oldfella wrote:On radio talking about the Power last night the "Foundation"? was mentioned and quickly hushed up?
What is this?
by nickname » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:10 pm
oldfella wrote:On radio talking about the Power last night the "Foundation"? was mentioned and quickly hushed up?
What is this?
by LPH » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:12 pm
Booney wrote:LEH wrote:csbowes...
I wonder if you would have the same view had YOUR club been FORCED to merge with North in the mid-90s?
You spend lots of time telling everyone how you are the WWT Eagles and get cranky at any mention of hybrids or merger, yet take almost every opportunity to go back to that time. No wonder you're still bitter.
by Wedgie » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:28 pm
LEH wrote:Assuming you have NO interest in AFL, would YOU support the 'new' club or go & support Glenelg, Norwood, Centrals or one of the other!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |