by wristwatcher » Sun May 29, 2011 10:40 am
by BAYSRULE » Sun May 29, 2011 10:47 am
by A Mum » Sun May 29, 2011 11:31 am
jackpot jim wrote:If what has been quoted by A Mum is true AND the player is proven guilty, as well as a long suspension, probably an anger management course and/or an umpiring course needs to be part of the penalty.
by field of dreams » Sun May 29, 2011 11:58 am
by basket case » Sun May 29, 2011 12:28 pm
by shootstavros » Sun May 29, 2011 12:47 pm
by field of dreams » Sun May 29, 2011 12:58 pm
by BAYSRULE » Sun May 29, 2011 1:14 pm
field of dreams wrote:Cheers for the details stav. Very good win for Compass. I note Glenelg played yesterday -Did McGregor and Massie play for Bays?
by LuvsFooty » Sun May 29, 2011 1:25 pm
basket case wrote:Is violence on the increace in u17s football? The game between Goolwa and Willunga yesterday was a great match to watch, but the fight that happened in the 3rd term was ugly and i was surprised that only one player was reported
by BAYSRULE » Sun May 29, 2011 2:50 pm
A Mum wrote:Thanks for sharing that statement from your president BR.
I also felt for the bays coach - he sat his players down in the middle of the oval - but what does a coach in that position say to his players.jackpot jim wrote:If what has been quoted by A Mum is true AND the player is proven guilty, as well as a long suspension, probably an anger management course and/or an umpiring course needs to be part of the penalty.
Following on from what JJ said above - and just out of interest/thinking out loud - what are peoples thoughts on this.
Is the GSFL responsible for some form of counselling for the boy?
Is the club responsible for some form of counselling?
Or does it just get dropped?
by neverwas neverwillbe » Sun May 29, 2011 3:12 pm
A Mum wrote:Thanks for sharing that statement from your president BR.
I also felt for the bays coach - he sat his players down in the middle of the oval - but what does a coach in that position say to his players.jackpot jim wrote:If what has been quoted by A Mum is true AND the player is proven guilty, as well as a long suspension, probably an anger management course and/or an umpiring course needs to be part of the penalty.
Following on from what JJ said above - and just out of interest/thinking out loud - what are peoples thoughts on this.
Is the GSFL responsible for some form of counselling for the boy?
Is the club responsible for some form of counselling?
Or does it just get dropped?
by BAYSRULE » Sun May 29, 2011 3:50 pm
neverwas neverwillbe wrote:A Mum wrote:Thanks for sharing that statement from your president BR.
I also felt for the bays coach - he sat his players down in the middle of the oval - but what does a coach in that position say to his players.jackpot jim wrote:If what has been quoted by A Mum is true AND the player is proven guilty, as well as a long suspension, probably an anger management course and/or an umpiring course needs to be part of the penalty.
Following on from what JJ said above - and just out of interest/thinking out loud - what are peoples thoughts on this.
Is the GSFL responsible for some form of counselling for the boy?
Is the club responsible for some form of counselling?
Or does it just get dropped?
Not the club's fault about the lads actions. He needs to cop it on the chin from the tribunal and then it should be up to his parents to sort him out. No club should have to put up with anything like this and let's hope it doesn't taint the Bays or the league.
by jackpot jim » Sun May 29, 2011 5:15 pm
basket case wrote:Is violence on the increace in u17s football? The game between Goolwa and Willunga yesterday was a great match to watch, but the fight that happened in the 3rd term was ugly and i was surprised that only one player was reported
by basket case » Sun May 29, 2011 6:23 pm
by tatts » Sun May 29, 2011 8:21 pm
basket case wrote:LUVSFOOTY AND JACKPOT JIM
Yes i agree with you yestersday game was a display of tough hard football and i was not having a go at the clubs ,it was the first u17s game i have seen this season and was just asking the question and i thank you both for answering it
by bluebagger » Sun May 29, 2011 8:59 pm
field of dreams wrote:Cheers for the details A Mum.Tiger83 wrote:Ban the player for LIFE.... anything less is not good enough! Punching an umpire is probably the lowest thing possible in football and is made even worse that it was a Colt that did it. No excuses should be made.. End of story!!!
I agree entirely T83. I know there are all sorts of reasons someone can snap (my a son has a condtion that can lead to meltdowns on occasion), but I still believe there are no mitigating circumstances that should reduce the penalty. As much as we love to give the umpires stick, they have the right to know they are safe and if something like this does happen then those in charge need to do everything in their power to stamp it out. Many umpires at that level are just kids themselves (I believe this was an adult though).
I also heard that the player later tried to get into the umpires room to take it further.
by finn » Sun May 29, 2011 9:19 pm
by limb » Tue May 31, 2011 10:58 am
by neverwas neverwillbe » Tue May 31, 2011 11:52 am
limb wrote:Does anyone know when the tribunal will be convening to discuss the fate of the young fella from Encounter Bay? Do they normally do it on Wednesday nights??
by field of dreams » Tue May 31, 2011 2:26 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |