by Sojourner » Wed May 18, 2011 9:08 pm
by gadj1976 » Wed May 18, 2011 9:14 pm
by Media Park » Wed May 18, 2011 9:18 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Mr66 » Wed May 18, 2011 10:30 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
by RustyCage » Wed May 18, 2011 10:53 pm
by bayman » Wed May 18, 2011 11:38 pm
by CoverKing » Thu May 19, 2011 12:14 am
Mr66 wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
Other way round for me.
by gadj1976 » Thu May 19, 2011 8:50 am
CoverKing wrote:Mr66 wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
Other way round for me.
agreed with you Mr66.
Trading YES and Drafting NO.
I think Drafting would have to much off a ripple effect, but trading would not as such.
If both parties could agree to it, why not? EG: Maric for Cornes as stated by the idiot the other week
by X Runna » Thu May 19, 2011 1:01 pm
gadj1976 wrote:CoverKing wrote:Mr66 wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
Other way round for me.
agreed with you Mr66.
Trading YES and Drafting NO.
I think Drafting would have to much off a ripple effect, but trading would not as such.
If both parties could agree to it, why not? EG: Maric for Cornes as stated by the idiot the other week
Either way it has a massive effect.
If a Sturt player gets picked up by Brisbane, he has to go to pack his family up and move them to Brisbane (for what could be a short time). It effects Sturt, the player and his family and perhaps job prospects.
If a Carlton (rookie?) player got picked up by Brisbane, same effect (Northern Bullants are the club affected in that situation).
I think the benefit would come from a guy who might miss being drafted, plays for a local club but plays well enough to be picked up. That way they don't have to wait till next season to be looked at.
When you think about it, AFL recruiters aren't interested in short term fixes at the start of a new season, because all their players are 'fit'. They're looking for short term fixes.
Think about a guy who might have a bad knee and clubs overlook him during the Nov and pre-season drafts. If he plays well locally he has a chance to 'drafted' during the season to 'fill a spot' on a list and try and prove himself. If the next batch of young kids come through for the Nov and pre-season draft, his chances of being drafted diminish.
by whufc » Thu May 19, 2011 1:04 pm
by CoverKing » Thu May 19, 2011 1:04 pm
gadj1976 wrote:CoverKing wrote:Mr66 wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
Other way round for me.
agreed with you Mr66.
Trading YES and Drafting NO.
I think Drafting would have to much off a ripple effect, but trading would not as such.
If both parties could agree to it, why not? EG: Maric for Cornes as stated by the idiot the other week
Either way it has a massive effect.
If a Sturt player gets picked up by Brisbane, he has to go to pack his family up and move them to Brisbane (for what could be a short time). It effects Sturt, the player and his family and perhaps job prospects.
If a Carlton (rookie?) player got picked up by Brisbane, same effect (Northern Bullants are the club affected in that situation).
I think the benefit would come from a guy who might miss being drafted, plays for a local club but plays well enough to be picked up. That way they don't have to wait till next season to be looked at.
When you think about it, AFL recruiters aren't interested in short term fixes at the start of a new season, because all their players are 'fit'. They're looking for short term fixes.
Think about a guy who might have a bad knee and clubs overlook him during the Nov and pre-season drafts. If he plays well locally he has a chance to 'drafted' during the season to 'fill a spot' on a list and try and prove himself. If the next batch of young kids come through for the Nov and pre-season draft, his chances of being drafted diminish.
by whufc » Thu May 19, 2011 1:06 pm
by CoverKing » Thu May 19, 2011 1:08 pm
whufc wrote:Does anyone truly belive the AFL would care how a rule like this would affect state league clubs.
by whufc » Thu May 19, 2011 1:10 pm
CoverKing wrote:whufc wrote:Does anyone truly belive the AFL would care how a rule like this would affect state league clubs.
good point
by gadj1976 » Thu May 19, 2011 1:12 pm
CoverKing wrote:
completely different. Northern Bullants are aware at the start of the year that this rookie may not be available for the whole. He is contracted to carlton and can miss bullants games because he is playing in the AFL. him moving clubs wouldnt affect it.
Drafting players would be taking the best players from state league clubs around the country that have committed to the club for the year. that player is under contract with the state league club. taking them mid season via a draft would have a far bigger effect on state league sides then trading players within the AFL.
by RoosterMarty » Thu May 19, 2011 7:02 pm
Mr66 wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Trading, no.
Drafting, yes.
Other way round for me.
by The Dark Knight » Fri May 20, 2011 4:19 pm
by CoverKing » Sat May 21, 2011 4:02 am
gadj1976 wrote:CoverKing wrote:
completely different. Northern Bullants are aware at the start of the year that this rookie may not be available for the whole. He is contracted to carlton and can miss bullants games because he is playing in the AFL. him moving clubs wouldnt affect it.
Drafting players would be taking the best players from state league clubs around the country that have committed to the club for the year. that player is under contract with the state league club. taking them mid season via a draft would have a far bigger effect on state league sides then trading players within the AFL.
But if the rule is introduced, then they'd be under the same illusion, that the player might not play for them the whole year.
Moot point.
Northern Bullies would still be affected because they might've banked on that player playing a component of the year when not required by their AFL club. This way, they lose him for the remainder of the season.
by Sojourner » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:48 pm
Sojourner wrote:Considering that the AFL are often regarded as being about 15 years behind the English Premier League in innovations, will we see Mid Season Trading happen in the AFL?
Various top level sports have mid season trading its hardly a new phenomena.
Where it may have some affect is that it has the potential to change outcomes for some of the sides if they get the right players, if a side is getting smashed each week in the ruck because of injury, so they trade someone for ruckman they can well turn that around whereas currently they have to accept it and hope that someone steps up to the role.
Clearly there are various advantages and probably disadvantages to be had - thoughts?
by TEX07 » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:31 am
CoverKing wrote:whufc wrote:Does anyone truly belive the AFL would care how a rule like this would affect state league clubs.
good point
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |