AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby sjt » Thu May 12, 2011 11:25 am

I just posted this on Adelaide Now (if it gets posted). Rucci is very manipulative (state the obvious).

"Stats are easily manipulated Michelangelo to push your agenda. For example from 2003-2007, Collingwood was second (by $200,000) to Sydney on football department spend, during this period they had 55 wins and 3 Top 8 finishes (NO premierships).Port were 7th on spend had 69 wins, 4 top 8 finishes and a premiership. Even at the other end St Kilda was 13th on football spend, had 11 more wins than Collingwood and also 3 top 8 finishes. Geelong were 8th in spend had seven more wins a premiership and overall better placings than Collingwood. Western Bulldogs second to bottom on spend during this period, yet have proved competitive over the past five years. Essendon were 5th on spend, more than the Power, Crows, Geelong yet had only 46 wins and two top 8 finishes.I could go on and on with these stats. You've been very selective in your examples!!
It's not necessarily how much you spend but how you spend it and how you draft, and injuries etc.
CAP FOOTY DEPARTMENT SPEND AND LEAVE OUR LEAGUE ALONE
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby topsywaldron » Thu May 12, 2011 1:13 pm

The proposal by the Eagles and the Dockers to field reserves teams in the state league has to be aprroved by a majority of WAFL clubs for it to progress. That vote may go a long way towards determining if the SANFL is going to come under similar pressures.

How is Port's vote at the SANFL commission now handled? Obviously if the Power want a reserves team the Magpie 'vote' will be in favour of it. Already it puts the 'yes' camp a vote in front which, basically, sucks. Another reason why it was a sad day when the Magpies died.

I'm going to leave aside the knee jerk and reflexive superstition of football clubs as I could write a ton on the stupidity of football departments that spend $15M on players to miss goals from straight in front. Basically their thinking would go along the lines of 'Collingwood have a reserves team. Collingwood won a flag. We need a reserves team too.' As little as five years ago the Eagles won a flag using the same player structure as the two AFL clubs here use, we don't hear too much about that.

As with a few other posters the day there are AFL teams in the SANFL is the moment I stop going.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby whufc » Thu May 12, 2011 1:22 pm

Yeah the whole reserves side idea is a complete joke.

Brisbane/Kangaroos/St.Kilda have reserve sides, how this helping them this year?

The AFL is designed so no team stays at the top of comp for to long and all teams who finish bottom get advantages to bring them to the top. The circle of life for an AFL Club. The 2 South Australian teams are currently on the wrong end of the cycle for various reasons including, poor draft picks, poor trading or lack of, experience players retiring etc etc, none of those things can be fixed by a reserves team.

There is no beneift for the SANFL if this happens. Some have suggested more media coverage of the SANFL. Yes there will be more media coverage for the SANFL but 90% of it will be for 2 clubs and the other 9 clubs will get the little left hand corner.

I really hope the SANFL clubs grow some balls and knock this one dead if put forward to them.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28585
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5917 times
Been liked: 2831 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby doggies4eva » Thu May 12, 2011 1:49 pm

topsywaldron wrote:The proposal by the Eagles and the Dockers to field reserves teams in the state league has to be aprroved by a majority of WAFL clubs for it to progress. That vote may go a long way towards determining if the SANFL is going to come under similar pressures.

How is Port's vote at the SANFL commission now handled? Obviously if the Power want a reserves team the Magpie 'vote' will be in favour of it. Already it puts the 'yes' camp a vote in front which, basically, sucks. Another reason why it was a sad day when the Magpies died.

I'm going to leave aside the knee jerk and reflexive superstition of football clubs as I could write a ton on the stupidity of football departments that spend $15M on players to miss goals from straight in front. Basically their thinking would go along the lines of 'Collingwood have a reserves team. Collingwood won a flag. We need a reserves team too.' As little as five years ago the Eagles won a flag using the same player structure as the two AFL clubs here use, we don't hear too much about that.

As with a few other posters the day there are AFL teams in the SANFL is the moment I stop going.


I would have thought that now there is "one Port Adelaide" that the PAMs could not vote on this as they have a conflict of interests.

Clearly this proposal would benefit the 2 AFL teams to the detriment of the SANFL. The question is should the interests of the SANFL be protected or the 2 AFL teams that (in theory) provide the cash flow stream to assist the survival of SANFL clubs?
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby topsywaldron » Thu May 12, 2011 2:27 pm

doggies4eva wrote:I would have thought that now there is "one Port Adelaide" that the PAMs could not vote on this as they have a conflict of interests.


Any sensible Port person able to answer this?
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby Aerie » Thu May 12, 2011 3:30 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
doggies4eva wrote:I would have thought that now there is "one Port Adelaide" that the PAMs could not vote on this as they have a conflict of interests.


Any sensible Port person able to answer this?


http://www.sanfl.com.au/news/sanfl_news/1390/

"Neither club would have the right to appoint an SANFL League Director. Instead, a Magpies-appointed representative would attend League Directors’ meetings by invitation. The current Magpies CEO would participate in CEOs’ meetings as the Magpies Operations Manager."
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5740
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby doggies4eva » Thu May 12, 2011 4:35 pm

So 5 clubs would need to support this to get it through.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby Barto » Thu May 12, 2011 11:16 pm

Didn't seem to be a problem in 1997, 1998 and 2004.

I love this stupid comment:

Adelaide coach Neil Craig has been far too diplomatic in the past month when asked about his chances of developing "the most exciting group" ever assembled at West Lakes when the SA football model deprives the Crows and Power of resources to compete with Collingwood.


The Crows facility is one of the best in the comp.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby areaman » Thu May 12, 2011 11:21 pm

Barto wrote:Didn't seem to be a problem in 1997, 1998 and 2004.



Or in 92, 94 and 2006 in WA.
User avatar
areaman
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:30 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby on the rails » Thu May 12, 2011 11:31 pm

Port Magpie fans beware. If the AFL Clubs get reserves sides then Magpies are dead. PAFC might want them to wear the black and the white but that would be just "pretend". If it does happen then the rest of the SANFL should insist that a Power Ressies team wears the Power colours.

In any event I will be interested as to how both the Crows and Power will be able to field 22 each week - even if the AFL player list is expanded to some degree?

There have been "whispers" that they will be able to split the best U18's from the other clubs as "rookie top up"? Bad enough that the SANFL Clubs lose the best in that age group to the draft each year but then to have the AFL clubs here just taking them to fill their ressies is something I hope I don't see.

The SANFL clubs have been screwed enough by AFL intrusion and bullying to our weak SANFL Management that we may as well just be an U18 development / feeder comp now and not go through the grief of a painful slow death to our comp as we now know it?
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby Dirko » Thu May 12, 2011 11:46 pm

on the rails wrote:There have been "whispers" that they will be able to split the best U18's from the other clubs as "rookie top up"? Bad enough that the SANFL Clubs lose the best in that age group to the draft each year but then to have the AFL clubs here just taking them to fill their ressies is something I hope I don't see.


If that happened most SANFL clubs would just about withdraw all funding for junior footy, if they weren't to see the fruits of their work in their own club colours....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby Barto » Fri May 13, 2011 12:04 am

SJABC wrote:
on the rails wrote:There have been "whispers" that they will be able to split the best U18's from the other clubs as "rookie top up"? Bad enough that the SANFL Clubs lose the best in that age group to the draft each year but then to have the AFL clubs here just taking them to fill their ressies is something I hope I don't see.


If that happened most SANFL clubs would just about withdraw all funding for junior footy, if they weren't to see the fruits of their work in their own club colours....


That's a given if the player is talented they're off to the AFL pretty much straight away anyway. If the Crows and Power want to develop players to go into the draft, then good on 'em.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby Dirko » Fri May 13, 2011 12:17 am

Barto wrote:That's a given if the player is talented they're off to the AFL pretty much straight away anyway. If the Crows and Power want to develop players to go into the draft, then good on 'em.


SANFL clubs develop juniors for their own needs too not just for the faint hope of one of them getting drafted.

If the Crows & Power could develop players it'd cost them too much money & resource. And why would they when SANFL clubs / TAC / WAFL etc do it for them....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby jockey » Fri May 13, 2011 4:42 am

SJABC wrote:I just wanna see the Power Reserves play Port Magpies...

One team....Bring it on....


I thought playing with yourself in public was taboo
jockey
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:55 am
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Salisbury West

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby whufc » Fri May 13, 2011 10:39 am

Interesting point raised by Tigerpie in the AFL forum.

IF the Power and Crows had reserves sides in the SANFL would the SANFL then be forced (or on their own wishes) change to follow the AFL rules and interpretations.
:evil:
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28585
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5917 times
Been liked: 2831 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby sjt » Fri May 13, 2011 10:43 am

sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby LBT » Fri May 13, 2011 11:01 am

Fuller is endorsing the SANFL be re-designed with:

TEN league clubs with the Crows forming a team to act as their reserves and the Port Adelaide Magpies becoming the Power's reserves unit.

EIGHT clubs in the reserves, under-18s and under-16s where there would be no representation with the Crows and Power.

SA's country districts be re-allocated to eight clubs, with Port losing its West Coast zone.

"Why (is it that) no one has questioned why only one AFL club (the Power) in the established football states of Victoria, WA and SA has its own development zone," added Fuller.

In the "One Club" format that has the AFL-based Power and SANFL-placed Magpies re-united at Alberton, the club is seen to have a direct link to a development zone on the West Coast

Bugger off Ron. :evil:
User avatar
LBT
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:39 pm
Has liked: 127 times
Been liked: 23 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby heater31 » Fri May 13, 2011 11:09 am

Ron is only writing that because he is campaigning for a fairer zone allocation for South Adelaide.....


He does have a point though the 'One' Port Adelaide does complicate the SANFL zones....
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16652
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1286 times

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby Wedgie » Fri May 13, 2011 11:10 am

Good article by Ron, basically has the same ideas I do, always knew he was a smart man! :D
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: AFL Reserves Teams spruiked again by you-know-who

Postby whufc » Fri May 13, 2011 11:20 am

Wedgie wrote:Good article by Ron, basically has the same ideas I do, always knew he was a smart man! :D


quick question Wedgie

have you ever been to watch an AFL affiliated club in the VFL vs a stand alone club game?

have you read the melbourne newspapers and seen how much coverage the vfl stand alone clubs get?
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28585
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5917 times
Been liked: 2831 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |