by sjt » Thu May 12, 2011 11:25 am
by topsywaldron » Thu May 12, 2011 1:13 pm
by whufc » Thu May 12, 2011 1:22 pm
by doggies4eva » Thu May 12, 2011 1:49 pm
topsywaldron wrote:The proposal by the Eagles and the Dockers to field reserves teams in the state league has to be aprroved by a majority of WAFL clubs for it to progress. That vote may go a long way towards determining if the SANFL is going to come under similar pressures.
How is Port's vote at the SANFL commission now handled? Obviously if the Power want a reserves team the Magpie 'vote' will be in favour of it. Already it puts the 'yes' camp a vote in front which, basically, sucks. Another reason why it was a sad day when the Magpies died.
I'm going to leave aside the knee jerk and reflexive superstition of football clubs as I could write a ton on the stupidity of football departments that spend $15M on players to miss goals from straight in front. Basically their thinking would go along the lines of 'Collingwood have a reserves team. Collingwood won a flag. We need a reserves team too.' As little as five years ago the Eagles won a flag using the same player structure as the two AFL clubs here use, we don't hear too much about that.
As with a few other posters the day there are AFL teams in the SANFL is the moment I stop going.
by topsywaldron » Thu May 12, 2011 2:27 pm
doggies4eva wrote:I would have thought that now there is "one Port Adelaide" that the PAMs could not vote on this as they have a conflict of interests.
by Aerie » Thu May 12, 2011 3:30 pm
topsywaldron wrote:doggies4eva wrote:I would have thought that now there is "one Port Adelaide" that the PAMs could not vote on this as they have a conflict of interests.
Any sensible Port person able to answer this?
by doggies4eva » Thu May 12, 2011 4:35 pm
by Barto » Thu May 12, 2011 11:16 pm
Adelaide coach Neil Craig has been far too diplomatic in the past month when asked about his chances of developing "the most exciting group" ever assembled at West Lakes when the SA football model deprives the Crows and Power of resources to compete with Collingwood.
by areaman » Thu May 12, 2011 11:21 pm
Barto wrote:Didn't seem to be a problem in 1997, 1998 and 2004.
by on the rails » Thu May 12, 2011 11:31 pm
by Dirko » Thu May 12, 2011 11:46 pm
on the rails wrote:There have been "whispers" that they will be able to split the best U18's from the other clubs as "rookie top up"? Bad enough that the SANFL Clubs lose the best in that age group to the draft each year but then to have the AFL clubs here just taking them to fill their ressies is something I hope I don't see.
by Barto » Fri May 13, 2011 12:04 am
SJABC wrote:on the rails wrote:There have been "whispers" that they will be able to split the best U18's from the other clubs as "rookie top up"? Bad enough that the SANFL Clubs lose the best in that age group to the draft each year but then to have the AFL clubs here just taking them to fill their ressies is something I hope I don't see.
If that happened most SANFL clubs would just about withdraw all funding for junior footy, if they weren't to see the fruits of their work in their own club colours....
by Dirko » Fri May 13, 2011 12:17 am
Barto wrote:That's a given if the player is talented they're off to the AFL pretty much straight away anyway. If the Crows and Power want to develop players to go into the draft, then good on 'em.
by jockey » Fri May 13, 2011 4:42 am
SJABC wrote:I just wanna see the Power Reserves play Port Magpies...
One team....Bring it on....
by whufc » Fri May 13, 2011 10:39 am
by sjt » Fri May 13, 2011 10:43 am
by LBT » Fri May 13, 2011 11:01 am
Fuller is endorsing the SANFL be re-designed with:
TEN league clubs with the Crows forming a team to act as their reserves and the Port Adelaide Magpies becoming the Power's reserves unit.
EIGHT clubs in the reserves, under-18s and under-16s where there would be no representation with the Crows and Power.
SA's country districts be re-allocated to eight clubs, with Port losing its West Coast zone.
"Why (is it that) no one has questioned why only one AFL club (the Power) in the established football states of Victoria, WA and SA has its own development zone," added Fuller.
In the "One Club" format that has the AFL-based Power and SANFL-placed Magpies re-united at Alberton, the club is seen to have a direct link to a development zone on the West Coast
by heater31 » Fri May 13, 2011 11:09 am
by Wedgie » Fri May 13, 2011 11:10 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by whufc » Fri May 13, 2011 11:20 am
Wedgie wrote:Good article by Ron, basically has the same ideas I do, always knew he was a smart man!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |