by White Line Fever » Tue May 10, 2011 10:58 pm
by cennals05 » Wed May 11, 2011 9:09 am
by Johno6 » Wed May 11, 2011 9:17 am
by Drop Bear » Wed May 11, 2011 10:28 am
CoverKing wrote:Apparently Koschitzke only got off for his bump because he hit his good shoulder, not the one curnow had just injured. If Koschitzke got reported and suspended for that, considering curnow had gone off and came back on, I would have thought every player would go off with an "injury" and come back on since they wouldn't be allowed to be touched. Joke!
by JK » Wed May 11, 2011 10:39 am
by Footy Smart » Wed May 11, 2011 10:46 am
Drop Bear wrote:CoverKing wrote:Apparently Koschitzke only got off for his bump because he hit his good shoulder, not the one curnow had just injured. If Koschitzke got reported and suspended for that, considering curnow had gone off and came back on, I would have thought every player would go off with an "injury" and come back on since they wouldn't be allowed to be touched. Joke!
What's the difference between bumping his good or bad shoulder? He still bumped an injured player. If Montagna was banned, then so should be Koschitzke.
A fine would have been more appropriate for MonTAGna. I think a suspension is over the top, but I'm not surprised with this pathetic Tribunal.
by Footy Smart » Wed May 11, 2011 10:48 am
Constance_Perm wrote:I haven't seen the Trengove tackle, but Im guessing it was just a hard tackle with an unfortunate and unintended consequence.
I understand the AFL wanting to protect the head, but they just seem so inconsistent with how they go about it .. Would have thought Tambling was pretty lucky to only get 1 for an intentional elbow to an opponents head.
by teaoby » Wed May 11, 2011 11:08 am
by JK » Wed May 11, 2011 11:13 am
by scoob » Wed May 11, 2011 11:18 am
by CoverKing » Wed May 11, 2011 11:35 am
by Mark_Beswick » Wed May 11, 2011 11:45 am
by teaoby » Wed May 11, 2011 12:40 pm
scoob wrote:The worst decision I have seen made by the tribunal... FFS Dangerfield had an arm free, I thought it was a near perfect tackle, worthy of 3 weeks - F@#k off! Are we now going to teach youngster not to pin an arm because someone may get hurt. Still perplexed how a legal tackle can get more games than an intentional elbow to an unsuspecting players head... Good Image you are putting out there AFL!!!
Do the tribunal still hear evidence from the 'victims'? Was the Crows medical staff evidence used? Why are they not speaking out about it and saying that there was nothing in it?
by Dirko » Wed May 11, 2011 12:47 pm
by best on hill » Wed May 11, 2011 5:16 pm
by lebron » Wed May 11, 2011 6:48 pm
by Dutchy » Wed May 11, 2011 6:51 pm
by Dutchy » Wed May 11, 2011 6:54 pm
CK wrote:Chris Judd has been reported for two separate offences, instigating a melee and engaging in a melee, from last night, but remains eligible for the Brownlow, as both offences are only fines.
by Aerie » Wed May 11, 2011 7:24 pm
by cripple » Wed May 11, 2011 8:07 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |