
by Interceptor » Sun May 08, 2011 6:17 pm
by tiger07andbeyond » Sun May 08, 2011 6:25 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by Interceptor » Sun May 08, 2011 6:35 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
by tiger07andbeyond » Sun May 08, 2011 6:44 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by Interceptor » Sun May 08, 2011 7:03 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:Jeansch
Radar
VB
by tiger07andbeyond » Sun May 08, 2011 7:05 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by 200 Killer Wasps » Sun May 08, 2011 8:52 pm
by Gingernuts » Sun May 08, 2011 8:52 pm
Interceptor wrote:tiger07andbeyond wrote:Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
Not it's not a joke![]()
Didn't have a heap of possessions, but put in a decent effort, tacked well and was reasonably effective in what he did.
Schmidt wasn't bad and could've got a vote as well.
Lets see your votes expert
by bloods08 » Sun May 08, 2011 9:14 pm
by tiger07andbeyond » Sun May 08, 2011 9:26 pm
Gingernuts wrote:Interceptor wrote:tiger07andbeyond wrote:Sloane? Is that a joke. Like the kid but only battled today mate, wasnt Robinson Crusoe tho.
Not it's not a joke![]()
Didn't have a heap of possessions, but put in a decent effort, tacked well and was reasonably effective in what he did.
Schmidt wasn't bad and could've got a vote as well.
Lets see your votes expert
In all seriousness tiger, is there a chance you might post something after a win one of these days? I think I've only ever seen you spew vitriol after losses, it's not a good look mate.
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by sapaul » Sun May 08, 2011 9:38 pm
by Gingernuts » Sun May 08, 2011 9:46 pm
by Interceptor » Sun May 08, 2011 9:50 pm
Gingernuts wrote:I admire your passion tiger, I just question why we don't see it when the team has a positive result.
by tiger07andbeyond » Sun May 08, 2011 10:08 pm
Interceptor wrote:Gingernuts wrote:I admire your passion tiger, I just question why we don't see it when the team has a positive result.
Another case of someone who just wants to sink the boot in to Craig after a loss.
He'd fit right in over on the Adelaide forum of Big Footy.
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by Tassie Blues » Sun May 08, 2011 11:14 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |