by CENTURION » Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:33 pm
by Barto » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:46 pm
by LPH » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:38 am
Barto wrote:Ye Olde Pissweak World.
by blueandwhite » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:15 pm
topsywaldron wrote:How long do you give it before Duncanson puts some red ink through the budget line marked 'Magpies'? Two or three years?
It was a brilliant move by the other clubs, eventually, to allow the two clubs to merge. When the axe does get swung it'll be a Port hand on the handle rather than theirs.
by Voice » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:43 pm
Barto wrote:Then we agree that when your club has exclusive use of the stadium that the other 1/8th dont have access to, then you will pay them to use it.
by beenreal » Sun May 01, 2011 9:32 am
Voice wrote:Barto wrote:Then we agree that when your club has exclusive use of the stadium that the other 1/8th dont have access to, then you will pay them to use it.
I wonder when the response from beenreal will come for that one. Well played Bartman!
I'm guessing we'll hear from beenreal again when it's convenient for him.
by CENTURION » Sun May 01, 2011 9:35 am
by Booney » Sun May 01, 2011 9:54 am
CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
by CENTURION » Sun May 01, 2011 10:02 am
Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
by Mr Irate » Sun May 01, 2011 10:12 am
Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
by beenreal » Sun May 01, 2011 10:31 am
Mr Irate wrote:Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
Your definition of "many" may not suffice, when Tim started promoting One PAFC, http://www.onepafc.com.au/, it was stated:
"ONE PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB Strategy
One PAFC is proposed to align the 300,000 Port Adelaide supporters and members with a common vision so the Port Adelaide Football Community is as one CLUB again."
I wonder how "many" of the 300,000 () will turn up friday night ? Or was 300,000 just an ambit claim from a club that now appears to have tenuous links with reality......
by Voice » Sun May 01, 2011 10:51 am
by JK » Sun May 01, 2011 11:02 am
Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
by CENTURION » Sun May 01, 2011 11:05 am
'beenreal wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
Your definition of "many" may not suffice, when Tim started promoting One PAFC, http://www.onepafc.com.au/, it was stated:
"ONE PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB Strategy
One PAFC is proposed to align the 300,000 Port Adelaide supporters and members with a common vision so the Port Adelaide Football Community is as one CLUB again."
I wonder how "many" of the 300,000 () will turn up friday night ? Or was 300,000 just an ambit claim from a club that now appears to have tenuous links with reality......
That would give the AFC about 700,000 supporters. Last time I looked (last night?) there wasn't 700,000 turning up to Crows games. More like 20,000 empty seats from a club with a waiting list.
by dedja » Sun May 01, 2011 11:07 am
Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
by Mr Irate » Sun May 01, 2011 11:52 am
beenreal wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:Port, both Ports, aside from all this, you better start winning because when you have no supporters at all, YOU'RE GAWN!!
Well, people like myself and many I know will be here through thick and thin. This will test Port fans to see who really holds the passion.
Im putting my hand up.
Your definition of "many" may not suffice, when Tim started promoting One PAFC, http://www.onepafc.com.au/, it was stated:
"ONE PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB Strategy
One PAFC is proposed to align the 300,000 Port Adelaide supporters and members with a common vision so the Port Adelaide Football Community is as one CLUB again."
I wonder how "many" of the 300,000 () will turn up friday night ? Or was 300,000 just an ambit claim from a club that now appears to have tenuous links with reality......
That would give the AFC about 700,000 supporters. Last time I looked (last night?) there wasn't 700,000 turning up to Crows games. More like 20,000 empty seats from a club with a waiting list.
by CENTURION » Sun May 01, 2011 11:57 am
by Mr Irate » Sun May 01, 2011 12:00 pm
by dedja » Sun May 01, 2011 12:12 pm
by CENTURION » Sun May 01, 2011 12:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |