by Dutchy » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:47 pm
smac wrote:Dutchy wrote:More mistruths from the SACA
What is?
by redandblack » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:48 pm
pipers wrote:JUST VOTED NO!
by smac » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:51 pm
Dutchy wrote:smac wrote:Dutchy wrote:More mistruths from the SACA
What is?
You vote FOR or AGAINST - not Yes or No
by Dutchy » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:19 pm
by Ecky » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:23 pm
smac wrote:Wow, you posted that instead of answering questions asked of you or responding to posts critiquing your post.
Starting to remember why I stopped posting in this thread.
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:35 pm
by heater31 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:36 pm
heater31 wrote:
I have sent a labor politician a list of questions well over 9 days ago. STILL NO RESPONSE or acknowledgement of my email sent on 13/4/2011. I haven't bothered with SACA as they still haven't responded to my email of complaint I sent in over another separate issue from the summer of cricket.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:37 pm
by Bulls forever » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:21 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.
by cripple » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:16 pm
by pipers » Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:32 pm
cripple wrote:If it doesn't get up, what excuses can i give my victorian colleagues as to the reason saca members turned down $535 million. might start with members being happy with their own new stand that gives them improved views of the hills then move onto how the drop in pitch will effect the uniqueness of the road that is the Adelaide Oval pitch and maybe finish it off how much of a joy it is for the footballing masses to drive out into the suburbs every second weekend and get stuck in fantastic traffic snarls looking at the unique architecture of the area.
by Hellboy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:14 am
by Dutchy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:43 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.
by whufc » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:46 am
Dutchy wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.
If it proceeds after the vote Ill support it, will be keen to see them keep their promises
by Footy Smart » Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:33 am
whufc wrote:Dutchy wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.
If it proceeds after the vote Ill support it, will be keen to see them keep their promises
Same here and i have voted against it.
by the joker » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:01 pm
by Aerie » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:22 pm
by White Line Fever » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:25 pm
Aerie wrote:Still can not see the logic in people voting no. Staggering.
by smac » Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |