Reasons to Vote "NO"

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby pipers » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:26 pm

JUST VOTED NO!
"loyalty is dead"
User avatar
pipers
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:47 pm

smac wrote:
Dutchy wrote:More mistruths from the SACA

What is?


You vote FOR or AGAINST - not Yes or No ;)
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46203
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2632 times
Been liked: 4297 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby redandblack » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:48 pm

pipers wrote:JUST VOTED NO!


Bugger, I thought you'd change your mind :(
redandblack
 

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby smac » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:51 pm

Dutchy wrote:
smac wrote:
Dutchy wrote:More mistruths from the SACA

What is?


You vote FOR or AGAINST - not Yes or No ;)

Wow, you posted that instead of answering questions asked of you or responding to posts critiquing your post.

Starting to remember why I stopped posting in this thread. :?
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:19 pm

Its a bit of fun smac, hence the :) & ;)

I think ive responded to most questions asked of me, happy to be proved wrong though
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46203
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2632 times
Been liked: 4297 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Ecky » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:23 pm

smac wrote:Wow, you posted that instead of answering questions asked of you or responding to posts critiquing your post.

Starting to remember why I stopped posting in this thread. :?

Well now you know what we feel like after being treated like that by the SACA!

I still haven't received any response to my questions. They must love MayZ more than me :(
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
User avatar
Ecky
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
 
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:26 am
Location: Wherever the stats are
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 78 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:35 pm

As long as you can still laugh when the Kangaroos are playing on Adelaide Oval Dutchy.

I voted For the Yes. ;)
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby heater31 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:36 pm

heater31 wrote:

I have sent a labor politician a list of questions well over 9 days ago. STILL NO RESPONSE or acknowledgement of my email sent on 13/4/2011. I haven't bothered with SACA as they still haven't responded to my email of complaint I sent in over another separate issue from the summer of cricket.



FINALLY A RESPONSE FROM LABOR :roll:

in the form of written letter thanking me for my correspondence and that they have forwarded it to the minister responsible and once they have received an answer from them then write to me again.


bit late as voting for proxies is now closed which leaves only tomorrow to write to me again and Monday to received in the post provided I will be voting on Monday night :?
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16677
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 532 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:37 pm

It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Bulls forever » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:21 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.


Can we call it "how I stopped the conspiracy" or perhaps "I saved the state" or even "I am waiting for my roof".

Now the greatest highlight for me has been reading 39 pages of rubbish for Pipers to declare that he has voted against the constitution change, because that it what it really is. AND guess what, a recent survey has declared that Pipers has posted 39% of all threads and MayZ 31%. Sorry MayZ your late flourish was not good enough to pip Pipers at the post.

BUILD IT NOW.
Bulls forever
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 5:27 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times
Grassroots Team: Tea Tree Gully

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby cripple » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:16 pm

If it doesn't get up, what excuses can i give my victorian colleagues as to the reason saca members turned down $535 million. might start with members being happy with their own new stand that gives them improved views of the hills then move onto how the drop in pitch will effect the uniqueness of the road that is the Adelaide Oval pitch and maybe finish it off how much of a joy it is for the footballing masses to drive out into the suburbs every second weekend and get stuck in fantastic traffic snarls looking at the unique architecture of the area.
cripple
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Mexico
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby pipers » Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:32 pm

cripple wrote:If it doesn't get up, what excuses can i give my victorian colleagues as to the reason saca members turned down $535 million. might start with members being happy with their own new stand that gives them improved views of the hills then move onto how the drop in pitch will effect the uniqueness of the road that is the Adelaide Oval pitch and maybe finish it off how much of a joy it is for the footballing masses to drive out into the suburbs every second weekend and get stuck in fantastic traffic snarls looking at the unique architecture of the area.


Nah. Just ask them how the grand prix is working out for them...
"loyalty is dead"
User avatar
pipers
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Hellboy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:14 am

I voted against it as well
Eric Freeman swayed me this morning as well as getting bombarded with e-mails and SMS's imploring me to utilise my democratic vote, oh and by the way, vote for it
Although I wanted football in the city, it is all a con job.
User avatar
Hellboy
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:06 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 4 times
Grassroots Team: Mt Compass

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Dutchy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:43 am

The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.


If it proceeds after the vote Ill support it, will be keen to see them keep their promises
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46203
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2632 times
Been liked: 4297 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby whufc » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:46 am

Dutchy wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.


If it proceeds after the vote Ill support it, will be keen to see them keep their promises


Same here and i have voted against it.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28739
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5954 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Footy Smart » Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:33 am

whufc wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:It's gonna be MENTAL on here which ever way the vote goes. Can't wait.


If it proceeds after the vote Ill support it, will be keen to see them keep their promises


Same here and i have voted against it.



Same here
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby the joker » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:01 pm

Why have people voted no..... The saca has. Massive debt and needs this vote to get up a lot more than footy does. With the afl media rights afl is in safe hands.
I love vegatarian food. It goes great with steak.
User avatar
the joker
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4687
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby Aerie » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:22 pm

Still can not see the logic in people voting no. Staggering.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5747
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 185 times
Been liked: 587 times

Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby White Line Fever » Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:25 pm

Aerie wrote:Still can not see the logic in people voting no. Staggering.

Blows ya mind hey.
So many muppets in this state.
Yes I mean you NO voters
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Reasons to Vote "NO"

Postby smac » Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:05 pm

My opinion is that many are jumping at shadows. Too suspicious and finding conspiracy where there is none.

Very disappointing, hopefully it doesn't cost state based control of game development for both sports.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |