Is Roo serious?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Psyber » Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:05 pm

Barto wrote:
Psyber wrote:All this pro AFL stuff is coming from people who make, or made, their living out of the AFL.
They are not going to say anything else...
Yeah but it's like a tradie who is earning money hand over fist saying "stuff apprenticeships, cut funding from TAFE"
I agree, but short term thinking rules.
Look at politics...
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:48 pm

Slashing the SANFL couldn't possibly help what happened at Football Park today. Jeez.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby southee » Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:27 pm

Barto wrote:Slashing the SANFL couldn't possibly help what happened at Football Park today. Jeez.


Agreed. Maybe a bullet would!!! ;)
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:11 pm

Maybe the SANFL could sell one of their AFL licenses, and maybe cull 1 SANFL club. Maybe 1 that can't stand on it's own 2 feet. Then put all their efforts into running 1 AFL club and an 8 team SANFL comp, instead of pumping money into a basket case. I'd rather that scenario than axing the reserves.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby SANFLnut » Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:15 pm

So the proposal is we sell off the Power to Darwin and as they are one club we can ship the Maggies into the NTFL. I am happy to second that one.....
SANFLnut
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 65 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:20 pm

Tasmania sounds more appealing.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby SANFLnut » Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:39 am

Kane Cornes obviously got a lot of publicity for playing in the reserves this week but how many other AFL listed players (including rookies) played reserves this week?
SANFLnut
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 65 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Ronnie » Mon May 16, 2011 4:02 pm

comments attributed to Matt Benson (CEO Sturt) regarding the Mark Ricciuto article as stated in yesterdays' Sunday Mail were classic. For someone who was helped on his way by Westies to make bucket loads of money in the AFL to then question the modest amounts that go back to SANFL clubs, well, most people would question the morality of that position if they thought about it.
Ronnie
Reserves
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Jars458 » Mon May 16, 2011 6:11 pm

And West got nothing out of Mark Ricciuto I suppose?

Its a two way street between the SANFL and the AFL Clubs. Finding the right balance is what is important.
Jars458
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby FlyingHigh » Mon May 16, 2011 7:20 pm

Ronnie wrote:comments attributed to Matt Benson (CEO Sturt) regarding the Mark Ricciuto article as stated in yesterdays' Sunday Mail were classic. For someone who was helped on his way by Westies to make bucket loads of money in the AFL to then question the modest amounts that go back to SANFL clubs, well, most people would question the morality of that position if they thought about it.


Reading this actually p!ssed me off a bit. The Riccuito article obviously got a big spot, and when Kennett or McGuire says anything at their pre-game lunches it often gets an article in the paper, so I would have thought such a response from Benson would have been worthy of a bit of a write-up. Fat chance we'd get the Advertiser to run such an article as it obviously disagrees with a pro-AFL perspective, and it seems to me those that run the Sunday Mail (not the actual journalists themselves) are getting lazier and lazier and just use a lot of articles from interstate.
Perhaps the best ones to ask how much "fat" there are at SANFL v AFL clubs would be Francou and Bassett, Bassett in particular given he is only a couple years out of playing. And maybe a couple of new players not originally aligned to the SANFL, such as Brad Fisher.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4911
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Wed May 18, 2011 10:19 am

Here goes Riccuito's ghost writer again:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6057811978

He wants the incestuous and limiting arrangement that has the AFL clubs owned by the SANFL and negotiating its stadium deal with the SANFL to end.


I kind of hope Port get their shit together and win a premiership in a way, at least it will shut these idiots up.
Last edited by Barto on Wed May 18, 2011 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby JK » Wed May 18, 2011 10:21 am

Barto wrote:Here goes Riccuito's ghost writer again:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6057811978

He wants the incestuous and limiting arrangement that has the AFL clubs owned by the SANFL and negotiating its stadium deal with the SANFL to end.


It will in due course, wonder what he'll complain about then?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Wed May 18, 2011 10:24 am

Constance_Perm wrote:
Barto wrote:Here goes Riccuito's ghost writer again:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6057811978

He wants the incestuous and limiting arrangement that has the AFL clubs owned by the SANFL and negotiating its stadium deal with the SANFL to end.


It will in due course, wonder what he'll complain about then?


I'd be more interested in who he's going to blame if the SANFL's control was removed. I'd be interested to know how they think they can just take the licences away.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby sjt » Wed May 18, 2011 11:03 am

I added a comment that the 14 team East Coast "model" has worked well thus far, hasn't it?? Most teams were on the brink until the interstate teams entered with their licence fees and the television rights that followed. Hawthorn (was going to merge) Melbourne, North Melbourne (to the Gold Coast), Richmond, Western Bulldogs, Carlton, all have been receiving hand outs from the AFL to prop them up.
Sure the Stadium deals may need re-working, partly due to Port not drawing the crowds they had "expected" in their AFL submission. But the Crows made a loss also. Hadn't previously Rucci been telling us Fremantle and West Coast are doing very well off field?
I wish our only state based newspaper in the could at least provide some element of balance.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Pseudo » Wed May 18, 2011 11:17 am

Barto wrote:I kind of hope Port get their **** together and win a premiership in a way, at least it will shut these idiots up.

I doubt it.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12254
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Wed May 18, 2011 2:17 pm

Pseudo wrote:
Barto wrote:I kind of hope Port get their **** together and win a premiership in a way, at least it will shut these idiots up.

I doubt it.


Yeah true, even though the Crows spent millions of dollars on their training facility the poor dears have to use tap water at training to scrimp and save.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 42 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |