Is Roo serious?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:38 pm

Interesting that there's a call to axe the reserves and shift them to SAAFL clubs, meaning division one.
That'll make the lower clubs happy, losing gun players and talented kids to a higher club at the whim of an SANFL club.
Clubs are happy to see their players head to an SANFL club to have a crack, generally, but shifting them to div one clubs won't produce much delight.
Also, if it costs so much to run a reserves team, who's going to cover that cost for SAAFL clubs? Those clubs have also been hit hard by the changes in football, along with societal changes in the past 20 years.
I'm not sure if the reserves does not serve a purpose...how many of the kids drafted in the past decade have been playing league at their clubs? Many would spend their time in the reserves, developing their skills.
I know that Roo is a very good friend of a board member at Westies, wonder if they've had a chat about this...
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Squawk » Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:50 pm

Just on SANFL clubs and crowds, there are some good points being made of late.

The league must be scratching its head with SANFL attendances this year. They have put next to no media promotion into it, increased ticket prices at the gate by 20%, programmed competing Friday night games and yet crowds have been great. AFL crowds (in Adelaide) on the other hand have been poor. It's almost getting to the point where the League might have to think about surveying SANFL club members about AFL attendances, LOL.

Just about every SANFL club has had real financial troubles in the last decade. Central has won just about every flag in that time and they can't afford to upgrade their oval lighting. North has done well but only after J-Lo came to the rescue with a pokies venue licence. South has done well, but largely due to a $1 year peppercorn rent for Noarlunga noting it has had a low membership base for years; Norwood struggled with losses in about 5 consecutive years and is still hard at it to keep its nose above water; Sturt has had problems with BarZaar and Unley Oval; Port nearly collapsed last year but then about 5,000 old and new faces signed up memberships in addition to the existing 3,000; the Bays have made a huge investment in their club facilities/function centre; And somehow Westies has survived with a base of not much more than 1,000 members until recently; and I'm not sure of the financial history with the Eagles but they seem to struggle to get crowds to match their on field performances in the last 10 years.

Contrast this with the local AFL clubs who have spent massive money building Taj Mahal facilities; Expanded their on field and off field staff enormously; Undertaken overseas trips to research best practice ; introduced new technologies like heart monitors, trackers, video capability to be sent to player's smart phones; About the only things they haven't invested in as yet are a hyperbaric chamber each and a private mountain in the Swiss Alps to do Altitude Training at, sight unseen. Oh, and the private jet to transport players to away games at low altitude.
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby SANFLnut » Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:54 pm

What about the kids that get drafted here and are not ready to play league footy yet? Bet the Power would have loved Pittard, Butcher , Moore, Trengove etc. running around in the amateur league last year.
SANFLnut
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 65 times
Grassroots Team: Happy Valley

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby saintal » Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:05 pm

Some very good pts made in this thread. I suggest people leave comments on the adelaidenow link.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
saintal
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5824
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 464 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby SnappyTom » Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:05 pm

Squawk wrote:Just on SANFL clubs and crowds, there are some good points being made of late.

The league must be scratching its head with SANFL attendances this year. They have put next to no media promotion into it, increased ticket prices at the gate by 20%, programmed competing Friday night games and yet crowds have been great. AFL crowds (in Adelaide) on the other hand have been poor. It's almost getting to the point where the League might have to think about surveying SANFL club members about AFL attendances, LOL.

Just about every SANFL club has had real financial troubles in the last decade. Central has won just about every flag in that time and they can't afford to upgrade their oval lighting. North has done well but only after J-Lo came to the rescue with a pokies venue licence. South has done well, but largely due to a $1 year peppercorn rent for Noarlunga noting it has had a low membership base for years; Norwood struggled with losses in about 5 consecutive years and is still hard at it to keep its nose above water; Sturt has had problems with BarZaar and Unley Oval; Port nearly collapsed last year but then about 5,000 old and new faces signed up memberships in addition to the existing 3,000; the Bays have made a huge investment in their club facilities/function centre; And somehow Westies has survived with a base of not much more than 1,000 members until recently; and I'm not sure of the financial history with the Eagles but they seem to struggle to get crowds to match their on field performances in the last 10 years.

Contrast this with the local AFL clubs who have spent massive money building Taj Mahal facilities; Expanded their on field and off field staff enormously; Undertaken overseas trips to research best practice ; introduced new technologies like heart monitors, trackers, video capability to be sent to player's smart phones; About the only things they haven't invested in as yet are a hyperbaric chamber each and a private mountain in the Swiss Alps to do Altitude Training at, sight unseen. Oh, and the private jet to transport players to away games at low altitude.


Excellent post, Squawk. Totally agree... ST...
The cats of Australia have made their choice!!!
User avatar
SnappyTom
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:08 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Pseudo » Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:49 pm

saintal wrote:... I suggest people leave comments on the adelaidenow link.

What, and confirm that people actually read their poxy tabloid?
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12254
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1656 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Dirko » Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:56 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:One too many concussion injuries me thinks.


Yep, my thoughts exactly.

Geffugged peanut....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Gozu » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:01 pm

Pretty poor article by Roo. If the Crows have 45,000 members and are now losing money that says to me the people running the club are doing something wrong. I'm sure there are a million areas the Crows could cut back on spending even outside of the player payments. But yeah sink the boot into the SANFL, the whole reason the Crows and Power even exist.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13858
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 682 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:10 pm

Yeah but it's his mates running the show at the crows.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby heater31 » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:47 pm

Absolute Rubbish, I bet the Jarman brothers paid him to write that tripe. Andrew in particular wants the Reserves comp gone as he has financial gain with his 'Football Academy'.


Not sure with the quoted running costs for a reserves side either. The players are paid peanuts and most of the support staff are volunteers or are involved with the League side
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16680
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby tigerpie » Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:58 pm

whufc wrote:Get fugged Roo

GOLD!!!!
tigerpie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5082
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Has liked: 636 times
Been liked: 524 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Sir Red of Norwood » Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:01 pm

Roo can eat a d|ck, the SANFL does not exist purely for the purpose of being an enabler to the wastefulness of the AFL clubs in this state. the SANFL owns the licences right? that makes the 9 clubs 'the boss man' in the relationship right? Not happy to see local footy being picked on here, not after the excellent way it has bounced back after the damage done to it by the V/AFL.
C'mon you Reds....Adelaide United = its just like watching Brasil!!!

I love both footy[NOT the V/AFL!] and soccer, is that even allowed??;)
User avatar
Sir Red of Norwood
Member
 
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:16 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Dutchy » Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:04 pm

Gozu wrote:Pretty poor article by Roo. If the Crows have 45,000 members and are now losing money that says to me the people running the club are doing something wrong. I'm sure there are a million areas the Crows could cut back on spending even outside of the player payments. But yeah sink the boot into the SANFL, the whole reason the Crows and Power even exist.


Port have 35,000 members, thats 80,000 AFL club members in the state, and its the SANFL clubs fault :shock: , gimme a break...
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46273
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2650 times
Been liked: 4323 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby SABRE » Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:50 pm

Perhaps all businesses that Mr Ricciuto has an interest in can be listed here.
I would certainly like to know them by name so I can boycott them until we
get a full apology for this disgraceful attitude.

Better still, all true South Australians should completely boycott the Victorian
joke calling itself an AFL.
NFC 2021
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Beyond Redemption
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby tigerpie » Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:54 pm

first the 19's now they want the reserves gone as well!!!.....where does this end ffs...the inception of the adelaide football club almost killed the GFC,(coach players support staff,admin etc) and yes i know it hurt every club.Through determination and sheer hard work the GFC and other clubs fought back and are now being rewarded for their efforts with good crowd numbers and membership.. And with great development programs, the AFL is benefitting by the standard of athlete presented to them at the draft camps.So now they want to give the sanfl clubs another whack in the hip pocket...GOOD ONE!!!.....What a greedy article by a bloke that i used to respect.
tigerpie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5082
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Has liked: 636 times
Been liked: 524 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:12 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:I'm not sure if the reserves does not serve a purpose...how many of the kids drafted in the past decade have been playing league at their clubs? Many would spend their time in the reserves, developing their skills..


Could be a hidden agenda there, imagine the outcry if an AFL rookie were playing ammos. We MUST have a Crows and Port reserves in the league then!!!

Or perhaps I'm mistaking Roo's idiocy for malice and he hadn't thought that far ahead.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:13 pm

heater31 wrote:Absolute Rubbish, I bet the Jarman brothers paid him to write that tripe. Andrew in particular wants the Reserves comp gone as he has financial gain with his 'Football Academy'.


Not sure with the quoted running costs for a reserves side either. The players are paid peanuts and most of the support staff are volunteers or are involved with the League side



Andrew Jarman is still involved in football? Unreal.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby The Apostle » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:18 pm

Pseudo wrote:
saintal wrote:... I suggest people leave comments on the adelaidenow link.

What, and confirm that people actually read their poxy tabloid?

Take my advice and just read The Australian...i'd rather have 0% SANFL than the shite that's dished up in the sports section of The Antagoniser!
The Apostle
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby Barto » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:19 pm

Squawk wrote:Contrast this with the local AFL clubs who have spent massive money building Taj Mahal facilities; Expanded their on field and off field staff enormously; Undertaken overseas trips to research best practice ; introduced new technologies like heart monitors, trackers, video capability to be sent to player's smart phones; About the only things they haven't invested in as yet are a hyperbaric chamber each and a private mountain in the Swiss Alps to do Altitude Training at, sight unseen. Oh, and the private jet to transport players to away games at low altitude.


Good point by the way, again some idiotic on the comments section of the article suggested that the clubs should keep every cent and be "super clubs". Oh really? How many facilities can the Crows build? It seems pointless for the AFL clubs to hoard masses of money if the commitment to football development is abandoned. Some people just dont even see the bigger picture at all.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Is Roo serious?

Postby whufc » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:32 pm

Wasnt it Tyson Edwards who refused to play SANFL last year when dropped from the AFL, also didnt Shaun Rehn sue AAMI Stadium (SANFL owned) a fair while back........

mmmmmmmmmmm. Edwards, Rehn and now Riccuito all have something in common.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28772
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |