TEST TEAM OF SAME PERIOD AS GREATEST ONE DAY TEAM

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

TEST TEAM OF SAME PERIOD AS GREATEST ONE DAY TEAM

Postby - » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:45 am

MINE:

Hayden
Langer
Ponting
G Chappell
Border
S Waugh
Gilchrist
Warne
Gillespie (3rd quick hardest spot to call) Worlds best quick in prime. Handy night watch.
Lillee
Mcgrath
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby MightyEagles » Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:35 pm

Would have been tough to leave Boon out.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:59 pm

I'd have Taylor in place of Langer so he could captain the team and add strength to the slip area, I'd also include Bruce Reid.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby - » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:12 pm

yeah taylor v langer close call howevr i considered the partnership factor

slips would be ok with border ponting hayden
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby am Bays » Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:55 pm

J Langer
M Hayden
R Ponting
G Chappell
A Border
S Waugh
I Healy
S Warne
C McDermott
D Lillee
G McGrath

A Gilchrist

I think Healys 'keeping skills match Gilchrist batting over his career, and his batting matches Gilchrists 'keeping. I'm picking Healy as I rate the 'keeping skills more important that the batting skills for a 'keeper. Besides if it will be a very rare event if he is coming in at lest than 5/350!!!!

I tried to fit in my first boyhood hero, Rick Darling but couldn't quite find a spot for him :wink: :wink:
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19615
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2082 times

Postby GWW » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:49 pm

What about Graeme Wood :P

:lol:
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15675
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 816 times
Been liked: 166 times

Postby - » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:00 pm

gd side tassie.

i accept mcdermott.

I hear your healy argument but dont know enough about the intricasies of keeping to comment albiet most experts take gilly as a whole package.

Other than that i believe langer/taylor/boon for opener is the only spot you can question.
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Aerie » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:31 pm

This is tough, but I'll give it a go. The older players (pre-1990) I'm going on mainly what I've read or seen on highlights packages.

Hayden
I Chappell (c)
Ponting
G Chappell
S Waugh
Border
Gilchrist
Warne (vc)
Lillee
Alderman
McGrath

Geez, there's some leaders in that side! Found it hard to justify leaving out Ian Chappell for a Langer, Taylor or Slater. If he can average over 50 batting at first drop then I'd trust him going out there as opener.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5739
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

Postby Hondo » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:32 pm

Almost picks itself I reckon - I would take Tassie's side except I pick Gilchrist over Healy. No disrespect to Heals but I would take slightly less keeping skills for a no 7 that averages almost 50 in test cricket. Gilchrist's entry into the side in 1998-99 (with Brett Lee) took the Australian test side from very good to unbeatable over a long period. I rate a keeper who can bat as well as one of the top 6 batsman (must keep wickets to test standard too). Like Jeff Dugon before him, Gilly helped to anchor a cricket dynasty. With guys like Gilly and Dujon you can be 5-100 and still reach 400 (which Gilchrist helped Australia do a couple of times). Gilly also kept well to Warney over 7 years.
Just my personal opinion - Heals is a legend too. He'd be my 2nd XI 'keeper.
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby - » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:39 pm

Aerie wrote:This is tough, but I'll give it a go. The older players (pre-1990) I'm going on mainly what I've read or seen on highlights packages.

Hayden
I Chappell (c)
Ponting
G Chappell
S Waugh
Border
Gilchrist
Warne (vc)
Lillee
Alderman
McGrath

Geez, there's some leaders in that side! Found it hard to justify leaving out Ian Chappell for a Langer, Taylor or Slater. If he can average over 50 batting at first drop then I'd trust him going out there as opener.


Once again only 3 spots to argue over.

I Chappell good and fair call however he didnt average 50. Id take his captaincy though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Chappell
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Aerie » Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:43 pm

- wrote:
Aerie wrote:This is tough, but I'll give it a go. The older players (pre-1990) I'm going on mainly what I've read or seen on highlights packages.

Hayden
I Chappell (c)
Ponting
G Chappell
S Waugh
Border
Gilchrist
Warne (vc)
Lillee
Alderman
McGrath

Geez, there's some leaders in that side! Found it hard to justify leaving out Ian Chappell for a Langer, Taylor or Slater. If he can average over 50 batting at first drop then I'd trust him going out there as opener.


Once again only 3 spots to argue over.

I Chappell good and fair call however he didnt average 50. Id take his captaincy though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Chappell


He averaged over 50 batting at first drop though. After 1971 he averaged 54 in that position.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5739
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:24 am

Aerie wrote:
- wrote:
Aerie wrote:This is tough, but I'll give it a go. The older players (pre-1990) I'm going on mainly what I've read or seen on highlights packages.

Hayden
I Chappell (c)
Ponting
G Chappell
S Waugh
Border
Gilchrist
Warne (vc)
Lillee
Alderman
McGrath

Geez, there's some leaders in that side! Found it hard to justify leaving out Ian Chappell for a Langer, Taylor or Slater. If he can average over 50 batting at first drop then I'd trust him going out there as opener.


Once again only 3 spots to argue over.

I Chappell good and fair call however he didnt average 50. Id take his captaincy though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Chappell


He averaged over 50 batting at first drop though. After 1971 he averaged 54 in that position.


Certainly if I picked my best Australian team, Chappell would be captain, and batting 3. I woiuldn't have him opening though because his record as an opener wasn't good. It was strange because he walked in at 1/0 quite often and batted well, but if he opened he could appear to handle it all that well.

As a captain though, Chappell is the man.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Hondo » Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:10 am

My only comment on Ian Chappell is that the tradition in Australia sides has always been to pick the best XI and then pick a captain out of that best Xi. In other words, you can't be captain unless you justify your spot on ability first. It's the English who used to pick a guy just for his captaincy skills and then bat him at no 7 (remember Mike Brealey).
So, I think Chappelli is one of the many legends of Aust cricket who gets squeezed out unfortunately. Plus he wasn't a specialist opener anyway.
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby Booney » Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:38 am

MightyEagles wrote:Would have been tough to leave Boon out.


Nup.Just ask Mrs.Boon. :cry:
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60925
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8041 times
Been liked: 11713 times

Postby Aerie » Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:31 am

hondo71 wrote:My only comment on Ian Chappell is that the tradition in Australia sides has always been to pick the best XI and then pick a captain out of that best Xi. In other words, you can't be captain unless you justify your spot on ability first. It's the English who used to pick a guy just for his captaincy skills and then bat him at no 7 (remember Mike Brealey).
So, I think Chappelli is one of the many legends of Aust cricket who gets squeezed out unfortunately. Plus he wasn't a specialist opener anyway.


I thought Mark Taylor was carried for a long time because he was captain of a winning team.

But I agree with you. The best XI should be picked and then the captain can be chosen. For the sake of picking the best Test XI I probably should have picked the best two opening batsman. Most probably Hayden and Taylor and leave out Ian Chappell.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5739
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

Postby Hondo » Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:32 pm

It might help in deciding on the Aust XI places in contention if we pit the team against the best West Indies test XI of the same era:

Greenidge
Haynes
Richardson
Lara
Richards
Lloyd
Dujon
Marshall
Ambrose
Holding
Garner

What Aust XI would you be prepared to put your house on if it had to match up against that ... Might put Alderman's potential spot in jeapordy (altho I would question it anyway unless the side was playing England in England). The Windies tended to tonk Alderman around pretty easily.
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby - » Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:06 pm

Richardson averaged 44.3 slightly overated.
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby rod_rooster » Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:33 pm

- wrote:Richardson averaged 44.3 slightly overated.


Didn't see a lot of Richardson i assume dasher.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby rod_rooster » Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:40 pm

hondo71 wrote:It might help in deciding on the Aust XI places in contention if we pit the team against the best West Indies test XI of the same era:

Greenidge
Haynes
Richardson
Lara
Richards
Lloyd
Dujon
Marshall
Ambrose
Holding
Garner

What Aust XI would you be prepared to put your house on if it had to match up against that ... Might put Alderman's potential spot in jeapordy (altho I would question it anyway unless the side was playing England in England). The Windies tended to tonk Alderman around pretty easily.


The fact that a guy the quality of Walsh misses out on that side is just incredible. It's just frightening to think how good the fast bowling stocks of the WI's once were. Throw in guys like Croft, Bishop etc. and what an awesome lineup.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby haloman » Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:06 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
hondo71 wrote:It might help in deciding on the Aust XI places in contention if we pit the team against the best West Indies test XI of the same era:

Greenidge
Haynes
Richardson
Lara
Richards
Lloyd
Dujon
Marshall
Ambrose
Holding
Garner

What Aust XI would you be prepared to put your house on if it had to match up against that ... Might put Alderman's potential spot in jeapordy (altho I would question it anyway unless the side was playing England in England). The Windies tended to tonk Alderman around pretty easily.


The fact that a guy the quality of Walsh misses out on that side is just incredible. It's just frightening to think how good the fast bowling stocks of the WI's once were. Throw in guys like Croft, Bishop etc. and what an awesome lineup.


When a bloke who took over 500 test wickets is carrying the drinks I think you know what the quality of the side is. But looking at that bowling line up you just couldn't find room for him.(Walsh) Maybe drop Richardson and play 5 quicks. Imagine facing a bowling line containing 5 of the best 10 fast bowlers of all time. :-s
User avatar
haloman
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: on ya misses
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Next

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |