by lutz » Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:58 pm
by Diesel » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:16 am
by Diesel » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:20 am
by Felch » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:21 am
lutz wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:I can't understand the point of playing players from Lucindale in your trial.
Trials aint all about winning, their about players ( team-mates ) gelling together & working on your gameplan & structures.
Players that want to head bush for $$$$ shouldn't get the satisfaction of having their cake & eating it too.
What do Portland get out of playing these Lucindale blokes?
I'd be having a look at some young lads while you have the opportunity, give them a taste so they know what they have to work on to play at that level & hold a permanent position in the side.
Throwing them in the deep end when your down on numbers during the year taking a punt could prove costly.
Spot on NoMercy. Don't think your the only one who feels this way. I'm also surprised that Pearce is playing these guys. To let them train train with your group is one thing, but to have them in your trials is an odd choice. It offers misleading results, and if I was a borderline A grade player missing out on a spot in a trial then I would be fairly annoyed.
by Felch » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:32 am
Diesel wrote:im starting to get the feeling we have too many people reading too much into trial game results...... everytime we hear about who played who the next question is who won when we should know it means nothing considering teams playing country bound lads and those missing through other commitments. as mercy said its all about trying people and giving exposure to the "inbetweeners" and those who have worked their butt off over the summer.
by LMA » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:07 pm
by Footy Chick » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:17 pm
LMA wrote:What happened to InTheChair's recent post aimed at a few of the portland faithful
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Dingles » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:20 pm
by Muffler » Sun Mar 20, 2011 7:56 pm
Felch wrote:All good mate, didnt realise it was you blokes until FC said afterwards.
Walsh is a gun, he came in handy for us tonight as Perkins and Vessali both were unavailable. That was Prior's first run for the club, so hopefully he will just get better from there. No Laslett or Granleese tonight either for us, so it was good to see some other faces step up.
by NO-MERCY » Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:29 pm
Dingles wrote:I'm led to believe that Seaton Henley trial was called off due to Henley needing to play it on saturday which seaton couldnt and seaton needing it to be played on sunday which henley couldnt, i think it was mutually called off.
by Felch » Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:49 pm
Muffler wrote:Felch wrote:All good mate, didnt realise it was you blokes until FC said afterwards.
Walsh is a gun, he came in handy for us tonight as Perkins and Vessali both were unavailable. That was Prior's first run for the club, so hopefully he will just get better from there. No Laslett or Granleese tonight either for us, so it was good to see some other faces step up.
Is las still oversea's or is he in adelaide?
Who is the big fella at Fullback would be a hard man to stop if he runs straight at you i would imagine.
by InTheChair » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:18 pm
LMA wrote:What happened to InTheChair's recent post aimed at a few of the portland faithful
by Q. » Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:54 pm
InTheChair wrote:LMA wrote:What happened to InTheChair's recent post aimed at a few of the portland faithful
Seems if your not a Portland die hard or a sa footy forum freak like all these people are eg thousands of posts you aren't allowed to postvyour opinion. I thought that's what this site was all about?. Oh well maybe one day I might be able to brown nose with footy chick and felch and talk about getting my rocks off while reading the most recent posts
by SATCHEL » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:44 am
Felch wrote:Muffler wrote:Felch wrote:All good mate, didnt realise it was you blokes until FC said afterwards.
Walsh is a gun, he came in handy for us tonight as Perkins and Vessali both were unavailable. That was Prior's first run for the club, so hopefully he will just get better from there. No Laslett or Granleese tonight either for us, so it was good to see some other faces step up.
Is las still oversea's or is he in adelaide?
Who is the big fella at Fullback would be a hard man to stop if he runs straight at you i would imagine.
Im not actually sure if Las is in town to be honest. I didnt see him Fri night.
The fullback has played for us for 10 plus years, just mainly B grade. He is a massive unit, and can play if he applies himself. You never know, a new coach may just bring out the best in him.
by SATCHEL » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:46 am
by piccachu » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:24 am
by One Eyed » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:26 am
by SATCHEL » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:52 am
One Eyed wrote:Hoping Mitcham had plenty out on Saturday they looked pretty ordinary
by Footy Smart » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:56 am
by Muffler » Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:27 am
marbles wrote:One Eyed wrote:Hoping Mitcham had plenty out on Saturday they looked pretty ordinary
The complete opposite to what they were saying on here last week. Hmmmm?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |