by Bum Crack » Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:17 am
by Bully » Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:22 pm
by dedja » Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:31 pm
by redden whites » Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:33 pm
Bulldog wrote:
But heads up for the japanese people not panicing at the shortage of food etc in the shops. What i mean is there is no mass fights for a bag of rice or a bottle of water like in third world countries.
by Bully » Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:11 pm
redden whites wrote:Bulldog wrote:
But heads up for the japanese people not panicing at the shortage of food etc in the shops. What i mean is there is no mass fights for a bag of rice or a bottle of water like in third world countries.
![]()
only 3rd world countries???
![]()
![]()
or like the 2 guys I saw beaten to a pulp in Maryborough during the flood period because they filled their car and a 10 litre jerry can for a tinny when a RUMOUR went around town that the servo was running short. The two guys actually ASKED the servo staff before filling it and the staff said the tanks were filled up an hour beforehand and they had no idea where the rumour started.
by fish » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:15 pm
by cripple » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:48 pm
by fish » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:57 pm
Yes Barry Brook is very knowledgable on nuclear energy and climate change and is a strong advocate of the use of nuclear energy to combat climate change. His website bravenewclimate makes for very interesting reading.cripple wrote:saw Professor Barry Brook on the 7pm project last night saying that the risk of anyone developing anything from nuclear overflow in japan is highly unlikely. He seemed to believe that most of the reaction to the possibility of a nuclear disaster was coming from a massive media beatup. He is the most credible source i have heard on the subject so far and seemed to have a lot of stats and figures to back him up.
Whatever the case, we wont know the end result of all of this until many years into the future.
by JAS » Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:08 pm
dedja wrote:Well this is way off topic but the safest, cleanest way to produce electricity is a Hydro-Electric power station where water, assisted by gravity, turn the turbines to generate electricity.
Back on track, the situation with the damaged nuclear reactors is looking grim. If it's too dangerous for workers to be onsite to try to cool the reactors then they could conceivably meltdown, or spew dangerous amounts of radiation into the atmosphere.
The likelihood is unknown but Jeez, it's a real worry.
1544A dam in Japan's north-eastern prefecture of Fukushima broke, creating a torrent of water that washed away homes, the Kyodo news agency reports.
by JAS » Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:25 pm
Bulldog wrote:redden whites wrote:Bulldog wrote:
But heads up for the japanese people not panicing at the shortage of food etc in the shops. What i mean is there is no mass fights for a bag of rice or a bottle of water like in third world countries.
![]()
only 3rd world countries???
![]()
![]()
or like the 2 guys I saw beaten to a pulp in Maryborough during the flood period because they filled their car and a 10 litre jerry can for a tinny when a RUMOUR went around town that the servo was running short. The two guys actually ASKED the servo staff before filling it and the staff said the tanks were filled up an hour beforehand and they had no idea where the rumour started.
i mean people arent killed....or armed guards with auto machine guns dont line the streets...etc etc. calm and content. Anyway....who goes to MaryboroughBest thing about it is the road back to brisbane
by dedja » Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:39 pm
JAS wrote:dedja wrote:Well this is way off topic but the safest, cleanest way to produce electricity is a Hydro-Electric power station where water, assisted by gravity, turn the turbines to generate electricity.
Back on track, the situation with the damaged nuclear reactors is looking grim. If it's too dangerous for workers to be onsite to try to cool the reactors then they could conceivably meltdown, or spew dangerous amounts of radiation into the atmosphere.
The likelihood is unknown but Jeez, it's a real worry.
Sadly everything has it's risks and hydro-power requires dams to be built so this could easily have been part of a hydro plant. I doubt there's really any large scale means of producing power that would have been safe in such an exceptional earthquake.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p ... 422862.stm1544A dam in Japan's north-eastern prefecture of Fukushima broke, creating a torrent of water that washed away homes, the Kyodo news agency reports.
Regards
JAS
by fish » Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:58 pm
by fish » Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:03 am
...it looks like getting AC power to the plant from outside may be one solution but that is not certain due to issues with safety for workers trying to connect it up.fish wrote:Have just read the latest posts on the pro-nuclear bravenewclimate website and it looks like things are pretty grim.![]()
I hope I wake up to better news tomorrow.
by fish » Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:06 am
they may also try some military water cannons to cool things down.fish wrote:...it looks like getting AC power to the plant from outside may be one solution but that is not certain due to issues with safety for workers trying to connect it up.fish wrote:Have just read the latest posts on the pro-nuclear bravenewclimate website and it looks like things are pretty grim.![]()
I hope I wake up to better news tomorrow.
by Brucetiki » Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:53 am
redden whites wrote:Bulldog wrote:
But heads up for the japanese people not panicing at the shortage of food etc in the shops. What i mean is there is no mass fights for a bag of rice or a bottle of water like in third world countries.
![]()
only 3rd world countries???
![]()
![]()
or like the 2 guys I saw beaten to a pulp in Maryborough during the flood period because they filled their car and a 10 litre jerry can for a tinny when a RUMOUR went around town that the servo was running short. The two guys actually ASKED the servo staff before filling it and the staff said the tanks were filled up an hour beforehand and they had no idea where the rumour started.
by fish » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:06 pm
by Bully » Fri Mar 18, 2011 3:42 pm
Brucetiki wrote:redden whites wrote:Bulldog wrote:
But heads up for the japanese people not panicing at the shortage of food etc in the shops. What i mean is there is no mass fights for a bag of rice or a bottle of water like in third world countries.
![]()
only 3rd world countries???
![]()
![]()
or like the 2 guys I saw beaten to a pulp in Maryborough during the flood period because they filled their car and a 10 litre jerry can for a tinny when a RUMOUR went around town that the servo was running short. The two guys actually ASKED the servo staff before filling it and the staff said the tanks were filled up an hour beforehand and they had no idea where the rumour started.
I think Hurricane Katrina would have been a better example of how a developed country completely disintegrated in a time of crisis.
The incident at Maryborough was an isolated incident, whereas during Katrina incidents like that (and far worse) were common.
by Brucetiki » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:17 pm
Bulldog wrote:Brucetiki wrote:redden whites wrote:![]()
only 3rd world countries???
![]()
![]()
or like the 2 guys I saw beaten to a pulp in Maryborough during the flood period because they filled their car and a 10 litre jerry can for a tinny when a RUMOUR went around town that the servo was running short. The two guys actually ASKED the servo staff before filling it and the staff said the tanks were filled up an hour beforehand and they had no idea where the rumour started.
I think Hurricane Katrina would have been a better example of how a developed country completely disintegrated in a time of crisis.
The incident at Maryborough was an isolated incident, whereas during Katrina incidents like that (and far worse) were common.
when you had a president at the time of katrina that looked down on New orleans as a third world country and he did nothing not even fly over the affected area for a few days then this tends to happen and residents would get upset. Any city or country that this happened in would go like this if their leader sat on their backside for days and did nothing. But yes katrina is a good example of a developed country with a major issue like the indoor football stadium (example).
But the main cause of this happening is because of the police force in new orleans collapsing during the hurricane and policemen/women walking off the job because it was to hard.
The army was called in to fix the problems as the police force was no exisitant for a certain time.
by dedja » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:41 pm
fish wrote:Yes Barry Brook is very knowledgable on nuclear energy and climate change and is a strong advocate of the use of nuclear energy to combat climate change. His website bravenewclimate makes for very interesting reading.cripple wrote:saw Professor Barry Brook on the 7pm project last night saying that the risk of anyone developing anything from nuclear overflow in japan is highly unlikely. He seemed to believe that most of the reaction to the possibility of a nuclear disaster was coming from a massive media beatup. He is the most credible source i have heard on the subject so far and seemed to have a lot of stats and figures to back him up.
Whatever the case, we wont know the end result of all of this until many years into the future.
I've been following the articles and blogs on there since day one of the Japanese nuclear crisis - they are very informative but a bit technical. I tend to think the contributors have been a bit optimistic about the situation in Fukushima, probably reflecting the pro-nuclear stance of the majority of the posters.
by dedja » Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |