
by Footy Chick » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:34 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by JAS » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:42 pm
GWW wrote:The Richter scale is a little difficult to fully comprehend.
Does anyone know how much more powerful the Japanese earthquake was compared to the one in Christchurch?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:10 am
by fish » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:45 am
by Brucetiki » Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:42 am
by A Mum » Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:21 pm
by Psyber » Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:37 pm
From the technical details that have been reported in the brief moments when the media are short of exciting pictures, it appears those reactors in Japan were reasonably sound design and up to date [in themselves] when they were built.fish wrote:So were the nuclear plants unsafe when they were built?
Or did they become unsafe sometime between then and now?
by dedja » Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:11 pm
by White Line Fever » Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:30 pm
by Brucetiki » Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:48 pm
by A Mum » Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:00 pm
by Bat Pad » Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:47 pm
dedja wrote:I wonder if Ziggy is regretting his stupid comments yesterday stating that we shouldn't worry about the damaged nuclear reactors and that they have stood up well under the circumstances.
Well Ziggy, tell the innocent millions that are at risk of severe radiation exposure that the power plants did their job. Sh!t happens I suppose.
by dedja » Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:40 pm
Bat Pad wrote:dedja wrote:I wonder if Ziggy is regretting his stupid comments yesterday stating that we shouldn't worry about the damaged nuclear reactors and that they have stood up well under the circumstances.
Well Ziggy, tell the innocent millions that are at risk of severe radiation exposure that the power plants did their job. Sh!t happens I suppose.
Can you provide a quote from a Nuclear Scientist who thinks that there is a possiblity that millions may be exposed to radiation? I'm not having a go, I'm interested.
by Bat Pad » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:02 pm
by JAS » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:06 pm
dedja wrote:Bat Pad wrote:dedja wrote:I wonder if Ziggy is regretting his stupid comments yesterday stating that we shouldn't worry about the damaged nuclear reactors and that they have stood up well under the circumstances.
Well Ziggy, tell the innocent millions that are at risk of severe radiation exposure that the power plants did their job. Sh!t happens I suppose.
Can you provide a quote from a Nuclear Scientist who thinks that there is a possiblity that millions may be exposed to radiation? I'm not having a go, I'm interested.
You need a nuclear scientist to tell you that if a nuclear reactor meltdown occurs less than 200km north of a city of 12million in a country of around 130million that there might be a problem?
by Q. » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:17 pm
by JAS » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:55 pm
Quichey wrote:Japanese nuclear experts have been deliberately witholding information and even understated exposure levels for the first 3.5 days. The total lack of transparency on the matter is making it difficult to gauge the true extent of the danger posed.
by dedja » Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:03 pm
Bat Pad wrote:No, but I'm yet to read or hear any nuclear meltdown is even possible yet alone likely in the situation occurring in Japan right now. And I'm not gonna take an alarmist media interested in ratings word for it.
by fish » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:52 am
by Bully » Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:42 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |