beeched iizzz wrote:big recruits played. did you miss the word 'headed' inbetween big and recruits?
Not getting into that 1 mate
by pigskin » Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:42 pm
beeched iizzz wrote:big recruits played. did you miss the word 'headed' inbetween big and recruits?
by McGovern » Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:52 pm
beeched iizzz wrote:Why mention how many you still have to come back in. Hate it when clubs say "but we had 10 out" that why we lost or "we had 10 out and we still won". trials should be about gettin touch rather than who did or didnt play!
Great to see birdwood kick a big score. They wouldn't have kick that score in more than 6 years. Its a shame they opted to play a lesser division with a good side. I think you always play the highest level you can play. Country division would be Divvy 4 at best, and divvy 9 at worst yet blokes are running around getting over 500 a game. If I was Birdwood I'd be asking the question from some of these players...Would you take a pay cut for success in a lesser comp? then watchem head to another patch of Hills grass.
by Joe Blow » Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:22 pm
by The Gimp » Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:55 pm
beeched iizzz wrote:Pig I did think they had the option to stay up but opted to go down. Birdwood 25 Jervois 6pigskin wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:Why mention how many you still have to come back in. Hate it when clubs say "but we had 10 out" that why we lost or "we had 10 out and we still won". trials should be about gettin touch rather than who did or didnt play!
Great to see birdwood kick a big score. They wouldn't have kick that score in more than 6 years. Its a shame they opted to play a lesser division with a good side. I think you always play the highest level you can play. Country division would be Divvy 4 at best, and divvy 9 at worst yet blokes are running around getting over 500 a game. If I was Birdwood I'd be asking the question from some of these players...Would you take a pay cut for success in a lesser comp? then watchem head to another patch of Hills grass.
I thought they got relegated, & what was the score please, did Jervois' big recruits play?
by Kick'n Back » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:21 pm
beeched iizzz wrote:Why mention how many you still have to come back in. Hate it when clubs say "but we had 10 out" that why we lost or "we had 10 out and we still won". trials should be about gettin touch rather than who did or didnt play!
Great to see birdwood kick a big score. They wouldn't have kick that score in more than 6 years. Its a shame they opted to play a lesser division with a good side. I think you always play the highest level you can play. Country division would be Divvy 4 at best, and divvy 9 at worst yet blokes are running around getting over 500 a game. If I was Birdwood I'd be asking the question from some of these players...Would you take a pay cut for success in a lesser comp? then watchem head to another patch of Hills grass.
by beeched iizzz » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:10 pm
by Joe Blow » Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:29 pm
beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
by S Demon » Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:08 pm
beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
by beeched iizzz » Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:14 pm
S Demon wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
I think a full strength Kersbrook side would cover a full strength Elizabeth side most days of the week...
by beeched iizzz » Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:16 pm
Joe Blow wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
That's a pretty big call to make, considering their a grade had their most successful year since they went up. So you can't really say they took a dive because they didn't even finish bottom.
by Rooster » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:41 am
beeched iizzz wrote:I wouldnt say it was any more successful than there 09 year. Think they won 5 in 09. They wouldn't have won more than 5 last year would have they?Joe Blow wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
That's a pretty big call to make, considering their a grade had their most successful year since they went up. So you can't really say they took a dive because they didn't even finish bottom.
by Kick'n Back » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:20 am
Rooster wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:I wouldnt say it was any more successful than there 09 year. Think they won 5 in 09. They wouldn't have won more than 5 last year would have they?Joe Blow wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
That's a pretty big call to make, considering their a grade had their most successful year since they went up. So you can't really say they took a dive because they didn't even finish bottom.
wow, birdwood can't get a break... not long ago we were blamed for fighting too hard to stay in Central div, and now we're being blamed for not fighting hard enough!!! beeched izz, you clearly no exactly what you're talking about. such an expert.
by McGovern » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:21 am
beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
by beeched iizzz » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:45 pm
McGovern wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
A mate knows a mate who knows a mate? Why would you post that then if you know it's got buckley's chance of resembling anything near the truth? If Birdwood were 'tanking' they sure went about it in a funny way - they beat Onkas (finalists) in the second round of matches. If you didn't have your head up your backside you would have also been aware that they fought tooth and nail to stay in Central Division. If they took a 'dive' then they would have resigned themselves to the fact and devoted their resources to next season instead of wasting them on the ultimately fruitless campaign to stay up.
I think you know all this though and you're just a stirrer who likes to try and get a bite from some people.
Rather than getting stuck into the Roosters, why don't you get stuck into your own A's. The biggest 'under-achievers' over the last couple of years..
by chopper7 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:27 pm
by superboot7 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:10 pm
by Rooster » Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:06 am
beeched iizzz wrote:like as weekend fishin trip. BAhahahahahaha! Nah but seriously good luck to birdwood hey! hopefully the 100k plus theyve spent over the last 3 years will pay off this seasonMcGovern wrote:beeched iizzz wrote:To gimp I say... Now who's talkin rubbish. You lads took a dive for success. A mate knows a mate knows amate and you did.
And to the D4 comment. Meant know disrespect but kersbrook only just covered Elizabeth and their nowhere near top end of D4 and kersbrook very high end country side????
A mate knows a mate who knows a mate? Why would you post that then if you know it's got buckley's chance of resembling anything near the truth? If Birdwood were 'tanking' they sure went about it in a funny way - they beat Onkas (finalists) in the second round of matches. If you didn't have your head up your backside you would have also been aware that they fought tooth and nail to stay in Central Division. If they took a 'dive' then they would have resigned themselves to the fact and devoted their resources to next season instead of wasting them on the ultimately fruitless campaign to stay up.
I think you know all this though and you're just a stirrer who likes to try and get a bite from some people.
Rather than getting stuck into the Roosters, why don't you get stuck into your own A's. The biggest 'under-achievers' over the last couple of years..
by The Low Down » Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:26 am
by Bat Pad » Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:07 am
chopper7 wrote:beached izz you are kidding ya self mate.... they would have spent the same amount of coin as you dopey mob you call hahndorf!! Barta would be on a killing, D Roberts was on over 400 plus when we was there but got sick of finishing middle table every year, Timmy Nichlos would be on the same amount of coin and Scott Purling wouldnt be playing for free!! so maybe check ya own clubs bank statements before dishing it out to others.... and why would birdwood ever want to go to divvy two after all the hard work they put in to get in divvy 1 in the first place and so masssive improvement over the years to then go down?? doesnt make sence so as everyone else has been saying check ya sources before ya start posting this garbage on here!!
by superboot7 » Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:56 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |