interesting

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: interesting

Postby spell_check » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:41 pm

Wedgie wrote:
nickname wrote:
Wedgie wrote:If it gets rid of the bye and gives me a chance to abuse some Crows fans then it's a big YES from me, I've always been a fan of this concept, so many more pros than cons.


How would adding two teams get rid of the bye?
Also, I can't think of one 'pro' that outweighs the 'con' of destroying the integrity of the competition.


1 would be added, the Powers reserves side would be the Magpies.
More supporters, more games, more coverage, more money, no byes, all good!
Integrity is fairy tale stuff and irrelevant IMHO. If anything it would gain integrity in more peoples eyes.
Just my opinion though, my opinion also is that it would never happen, it's a bit too progressive for a lot of people in this state, a bit like having a decent sports stadium! ;)


If they went to 22 rounds there would be more games = 110 minor round matches.
But you would expect them to go to 18 rounds to be equitable = 90 minor round matches.
At the moment there are 21 rounds with four matches and 2 with three = 90 minor round matches.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18812
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 224 times

Re: interesting

Postby Wedgie » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:46 pm

spell_check wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
nickname wrote:
Wedgie wrote:If it gets rid of the bye and gives me a chance to abuse some Crows fans then it's a big YES from me, I've always been a fan of this concept, so many more pros than cons.


How would adding two teams get rid of the bye?
Also, I can't think of one 'pro' that outweighs the 'con' of destroying the integrity of the competition.


1 would be added, the Powers reserves side would be the Magpies.
More supporters, more games, more coverage, more money, no byes, all good!
Integrity is fairy tale stuff and irrelevant IMHO. If anything it would gain integrity in more peoples eyes.
Just my opinion though, my opinion also is that it would never happen, it's a bit too progressive for a lot of people in this state, a bit like having a decent sports stadium! ;)


If they went to 22 rounds there would be more games = 110 minor round matches.
But you would expect them to go to 18 rounds to be equitable = 90 minor round matches.
At the moment there are 21 rounds with four matches and 2 with three = 90 minor round matches.


Why would you expect that when it wasn't the case when we previously had 10 teams?
I would expect it to be the same as it was before.
Doesn't really matter, as I said, it wont happen.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: interesting

Postby HOORAY PUNT » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:54 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Wedgie wrote:If it gets rid of the bye and gives me a chance to abuse some Crows fans


You had me at abuse crows fans.


So why did you ask for his pros and cons ? Anyone else confused ?
HOORAY PUNT
 

Re: interesting

Postby spell_check » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:54 pm

I know it won't happen; ok, 90% sure it won't happen - 10% gut feeling they will keel over to the AFL.
But when there was talk of the NT team joining recently, the SANFL said it would be 18 rounds to "simplify the draw". However, you would expect that it would be 22 rounds to line up with the AFL and how many matches they play.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18812
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 224 times

Re: interesting

Postby csbowes » Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:49 pm

I think the introduction of the Eagles and Dockers sides into the WAFL is a sign of what's to come here. I completely agree with the negatives raised in this thread about where do they get the other players from, what happens if they can't put out a full team, do they have a reserves side in the WAFL and then a colts? If they have enough players, where do the surplus players play that weekend, again reserves and colts?

Do they just get filled up with left over players from other clubs? The whole situation is messy, but guess what, talk to people like Cornes and I don't think they'd care about these questions. I don't think the SANFL will have the strength to resist the AFL and the AFL clubs. When it comes down to it, Port Adelaide and Adelaide don't give a toss about the SANFL and haven't since probably after the first few years the Crows were in the "big league".

They'll pressure the commission and eventually some half-arsed method will get traction and before you know it the teams will be entered into the league, Magpies will become Power, Crows will end the bye...

... and before you know it we'll be talking about the Crows and Port making their 11th grannie in a row. Why play for Sturt when you can play for two AFL clubs, best chance of being noticed and given a contract.

Better training facilities...

Better medical facilities...

Better everything, they'll have access to facilities and experts beyond SANFL club dreams...

Once that decision is made, that's it for this league IMHO.
csbowes
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: Alma
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 77 times

Re: interesting

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:53 pm

HOORAY PUNT wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Wedgie wrote:If it gets rid of the bye and gives me a chance to abuse some Crows fans


You had me at abuse crows fans.


So why did you ask for his pros and cons ? Anyone else confused ?


Just you.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: interesting

Postby HOORAY PUNT » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:07 pm

Nah , don't think on my own . I think you are with me as well . :lol:
HOORAY PUNT
 

Re: interesting

Postby JK » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:05 pm

I dont think there's any reason for it to have to happen here, and it should be avoidable if the clubs can remain financial enough (should they be opposed to it, which I would certainly hope they would).

Whilst the SANFL owns the two local AFL licenses there's a chance it could happen, but I would think the Crows and Power's desire to own their own licenses would be greater than a want for reserves teams, and I can only see them having one or the other.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: interesting

Postby Wedgie » Fri Mar 11, 2011 7:40 am

LMAO @ Port and Crows contesting the GFs. They'd be bottom 2 most years with perhaps South swapping with them occasionally.
I'd make the ressies and juniors an 8 team comp and rezone accordingly.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |