by LMA » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:55 pm
by catchisthecry » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:22 am
by finn » Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:17 am
by catchisthecry » Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:27 am
by Pag » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:38 am
They didn't win the flag...catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury
At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!
by dee man » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:02 am
by rubbers0ul » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:54 pm
by TEX07 » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:12 pm
Pag wrote:They didn't win the flag...catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury
At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!
by rubbers0ul » Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:37 pm
TEX07 wrote:Pag wrote:They didn't win the flag...catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury
At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!
No they didnt, and they dropped more than one game, we beat them twice and they beat us twice during the year. If it is the same side they might do well though, they have been around the mark for the last three years, with only us and PAC causing them any grief, maybe its thier turn. From last year I would say that if Fitzroy and Salisbury keep on the way they were they are the two sides that may stand in thier way.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:00 pm
catchisthecry wrote:Fitzroy
Winfield Royals.
Unley
Scotch
Pultney
Hectorville
Adelaide Uni
Elizabeth
Salisbury
At this stage 9-team comp.
Adel Uni dropped one game in C4 last year right? So why do they stay in C4 again? Give them the cup already!
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by finn » Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:52 am
by catchisthecry » Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:03 pm
by beef » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:57 am
catchisthecry wrote:Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?
by finn » Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:05 am
beef wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?
Hopefully 8 teams with no byes would be the smart thing, may upset some triple headers though
by Roaring Lion! » Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:19 am
finn wrote:beef wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Heard from someone wingfield have officially pulled out. Can anyone confirm?
Would an 8 team comp mean 4 byes each?
Hopefully 8 teams with no byes would be the smart thing, may upset some triple headers though
according to the amateur league eight team competitions are too hard to program because of oval clashes with higher grades...
by TEX07 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 11:43 am
by Roaring Lion! » Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:34 pm
TEX07 wrote:8 team comp with 4 byes sucked the big one last year! surely they can get each grade to agree that when they have a bye they will play the other team with the bye at that point, if it means that you play certain sides more than others then so be it, some sides will get a better draw than others. This should not change the double headers for sides so that keeps them happy.
by TEX07 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:26 pm
Roaring Lion! wrote:TEX07 wrote:8 team comp with 4 byes sucked the big one last year! surely they can get each grade to agree that when they have a bye they will play the other team with the bye at that point, if it means that you play certain sides more than others then so be it, some sides will get a better draw than others. This should not change the double headers for sides so that keeps them happy.
We tried to get that going last year but unfortunatlety other clubs were not interested so the league knocked it back at the time & even asked your club to play a non-points game mid way through the year around the long weekend as we both had a bye (2weeks off each) around it but the powers to be couldnt make it work.
Hopefully we dont get the same senario as last years draw with a stop start season mate.
by Roaring Lion! » Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:21 pm
by BenchedEagle » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:40 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |