by wycbloods » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:17 pm
by Jabber » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:25 pm
wycbloods wrote:Well CK has started something here.
Personally i believe Greg's approach to skippering the side, i can only go by what i witnessed and that of others i have spoken to from other sides, has been to put forward the younger players he feels have talent and give them a go in section 1. He has obviously felt this is the best way to go, that is clearly debatable and i think what CK has questioned is has he hidden behind this and used it as an exucse to not stand up and try and lead the side by example and hopefully have the younger members of the side follow his lead.
For example he hasn't bowled nearly as many overs recently has some of the others in his side. I think Greg is held in reasonably high regards throughout the comp for his bowling, again my opinion but it looks from afar that he has put the development of the younger brigade ahead of what i would consider their best attempts to be as competitive as possible.
My thoughts and not sure whether people agree or not but i am certain people criticising the PFCC committee on here isn't going to solve any of the problems that have been discussed.
It is much easier for people to sit back and criticise than it is to get of you arse and help create some change at your club and perhaps that is where some people should invest their time instead of having potshots at those who have given it a go, whether they were successful or not.
by wycbloods » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:32 pm
Jabber wrote:wycbloods wrote:Well CK has started something here.
Personally i believe Greg's approach to skippering the side, i can only go by what i witnessed and that of others i have spoken to from other sides, has been to put forward the younger players he feels have talent and give them a go in section 1. He has obviously felt this is the best way to go, that is clearly debatable and i think what CK has questioned is has he hidden behind this and used it as an exucse to not stand up and try and lead the side by example and hopefully have the younger members of the side follow his lead.
For example he hasn't bowled nearly as many overs recently has some of the others in his side. I think Greg is held in reasonably high regards throughout the comp for his bowling, again my opinion but it looks from afar that he has put the development of the younger brigade ahead of what i would consider their best attempts to be as competitive as possible.
My thoughts and not sure whether people agree or not but i am certain people criticising the PFCC committee on here isn't going to solve any of the problems that have been discussed.
It is much easier for people to sit back and criticise than it is to get of you arse and help create some change at your club and perhaps that is where some people should invest their time instead of having potshots at those who have given it a go, whether they were successful or not.
A lot more diplomatically put, and possibly closer to the mark.
I'm not going to go into the ins-and-outs of what plympton's goals are and the way we are/have attempted to achieve them. Because that's for Plympton to worry about, just like any other Club.
Its easy to kick a club when it's down, and more easier to kick the leader of a team that has under performed, which is what occured last night on here and in part into today.
What I am in utter disbelief of is figjam's rant on here... which to say the least is astounding, to have a crack at the people that are attempting to set a course for the club into the future. I'm all for healthy debate, in the right forum (certainly not this one), but to "bash" the people who put thier hands up to do the work is amazing.
Lucky there are some out there with thick skins, while others walk around with thick skulls.
by Jabber » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:49 pm
wycbloods wrote:Jabber wrote:wycbloods wrote:Well CK has started something here.
Personally i believe Greg's approach to skippering the side, i can only go by what i witnessed and that of others i have spoken to from other sides, has been to put forward the younger players he feels have talent and give them a go in section 1. He has obviously felt this is the best way to go, that is clearly debatable and i think what CK has questioned is has he hidden behind this and used it as an exucse to not stand up and try and lead the side by example and hopefully have the younger members of the side follow his lead.
For example he hasn't bowled nearly as many overs recently has some of the others in his side. I think Greg is held in reasonably high regards throughout the comp for his bowling, again my opinion but it looks from afar that he has put the development of the younger brigade ahead of what i would consider their best attempts to be as competitive as possible.
My thoughts and not sure whether people agree or not but i am certain people criticising the PFCC committee on here isn't going to solve any of the problems that have been discussed.
It is much easier for people to sit back and criticise than it is to get of you arse and help create some change at your club and perhaps that is where some people should invest their time instead of having potshots at those who have given it a go, whether they were successful or not.
A lot more diplomatically put, and possibly closer to the mark.
I'm not going to go into the ins-and-outs of what plympton's goals are and the way we are/have attempted to achieve them. Because that's for Plympton to worry about, just like any other Club.
Its easy to kick a club when it's down, and more easier to kick the leader of a team that has under performed, which is what occured last night on here and in part into today.
What I am in utter disbelief of is figjam's rant on here... which to say the least is astounding, to have a crack at the people that are attempting to set a course for the club into the future. I'm all for healthy debate, in the right forum (certainly not this one), but to "bash" the people who put thier hands up to do the work is amazing.
Lucky there are some out there with thick skins, while others walk around with thick skulls.
I think his username says a little about the type of person he is.
by FIGJAM11 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:02 pm
Jabber wrote:What I am in utter disbelief of is figjam's rant on here... which to say the least is astounding, to have a crack at the people that are attempting to set a course for the club into the future. I'm all for healthy debate, in the right forum (certainly not this one), but to "bash" the people who put thier hands up to do the work is amazing.
by Jabber » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:11 pm
FIGJAM11 wrote:Jabber wrote:What I am in utter disbelief of is figjam's rant on here... which to say the least is astounding, to have a crack at the people that are attempting to set a course for the club into the future. I'm all for healthy debate, in the right forum (certainly not this one), but to "bash" the people who put thier hands up to do the work is amazing.
Sorry i thought the subject of relegation was risen and this is a cricket forum that is free for people to express their opinions ? Maybe a few more smiles makes better reading Bloods .....Now Jabber DO NOT go off on your little space trips and read things into my posts that arent there. Re read them thoroughly without adding your drama to it . The point im making is that a one person commitee is not good for a club and if there is any other clubs out there that is run by one person then prove me wrong !
Catch u for a beer soon
by Gowser » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:15 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:I think the Champion Player in my cricket has the top 3 about right. However I'm not sure if it's consistent points for all players. I know the Ramblers can't get any catches to appear in the points when they are are supposed to be worth 1 each. Some clubs haven't entered them.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:19 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:20 pm
Gowser wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I think the Champion Player in my cricket has the top 3 about right. However I'm not sure if it's consistent points for all players. I know the Ramblers can't get any catches to appear in the points when they are are supposed to be worth 1 each. Some clubs haven't entered them.
Mycricket doesnt work like that mate. The number of catches a person takes have to be counted and entered as an interger for each player, it doesnt 'pull' that info from names entered in the scorecard. If you look at the bottom of a scorecard you will notice under the bowling figures that there is a tally for catches, run outs and stumpings, that is where the data is pulled from to allocate championship points.
Also, Plympton should not be relegated regardless of where they finish. WOS have to go.
by Jabber » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:29 pm
CoverKing wrote:Gowser wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I think the Champion Player in my cricket has the top 3 about right. However I'm not sure if it's consistent points for all players. I know the Ramblers can't get any catches to appear in the points when they are are supposed to be worth 1 each. Some clubs haven't entered them.
Mycricket doesnt work like that mate. The number of catches a person takes have to be counted and entered as an interger for each player, it doesnt 'pull' that info from names entered in the scorecard. If you look at the bottom of a scorecard you will notice under the bowling figures that there is a tally for catches, run outs and stumpings, that is where the data is pulled from to allocate championship points.
Also, Plympton should not be relegated regardless of where they finish. WOS have to go.
I think thats what AF was saying wasnt he?
And plympton and WOS might both go. As i said, WOS will fold (IMO, or be relegated), and with North Haven/Belair coming up, if one those win the flag, plus the possibility of Port Noarlunga coming into the comp.
My personal opinion is that if two A grade sides make the GF in section 2, both sides should be promoted in such instance where two sides have been so poor in section 1.
by Jabber » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:31 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:i would take FIGJAMS comments like a grain a salt..
He states all the negatives bout the club but he's one of the main insticators down there!!! Almost nearlly impossibe to captain him... Bitches and moans when it doesn't go his way. For example the year the B's played off in the GF he played the bare minimum to qualify for finals and in those games he contributed very little. He may have made a 30 odd...
He very rarely trained, but when finals came round he was there at training... As soon as the GF side was selected, and he missed out he carried on like a spoilt child! Even though he didnt earn his spot! And when we lost He bagged the captain, myself and everyone in the side!! That has stuck with me since. Not once was it said to our face....
FJ 'could' bring so many positives to the club. He is a very talented cricketer, and 'could' teach the young lads some great batting advice. I prersonally enjoy batting with him. But i feel he has had chip on shoulder for reasons im not to sure about...
on greg, i feel he has the rite ideas and could be a very good captain for the club... he obviously has things to work on (as does every captain) which im sure the club will address and i will not comment on this forum. and befroe anyone jumps on me from pfcc, they are not negatives they are constructive....
it will be a sad day if pfcc get relegated... and its a shame to see our 2's struggling.. But i know we'll bounce back regardless what ever happens. were a proud club and one of the most successful clubs in the asca and this is a hurdle and we will jump ot and move forward...
GOOD LUCK DOGS!!!
by Gowser » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:32 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:38 pm
Gowser wrote:Ahhh he might have CK, i thought it read that Ramblers weren't getting their catches to appear because other clubs weren't entering them.
Belair are not a div 1 side and there oval is not fit for cricket full stop, played them on the weekend.
PS: How is your WC multi lookin?
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:01 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:06 pm
bazza1 wrote:I was in the same position Greg is in the season before last, lots of young lads and not much experience. The trouble with that is, as a captain you want to give these guys every opportunity to succeed and by doing that you put yourself last. I see what he is trying to do and I dont think you can be to critical until you have captained a side that hasnt had much success and been in the same position.
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:10 pm
by CoverKing » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:14 pm
bazza1 wrote:I wasnt aiming that at anyone in particular, I was just trying to point out that its hard to have a team for of young lads and doing the best for your team. My positive attidude comes from playing 500 saturdays
by woodublieve12 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:18 pm
Gowser wrote:Ahhh he might have CK, i thought it read that Ramblers weren't getting their catches to appear because other clubs weren't entering them.
Belair are not a div 1 side and there oval is not fit for cricket full stop, played them on the weekend.
PS: How is your WC multi lookin?
by bazza1 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:19 pm
CoverKing wrote:bazza1 wrote:I wasnt aiming that at anyone in particular, I was just trying to point out that its hard to have a team for of young lads and doing the best for your team. My positive attidude comes from playing 500 saturdays
how does that bring a positive attitude??i couldnt think of anything worse than spending so many saturdays with the brother
by Amateur Footy » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:21 pm
Gowser wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:I think the Champion Player in my cricket has the top 3 about right. However I'm not sure if it's consistent points for all players. I know the Ramblers can't get any catches to appear in the points when they are are supposed to be worth 1 each. Some clubs haven't entered them.
Mycricket doesnt work like that mate. The number of catches a person takes have to be counted and entered as an interger for each player, it doesnt 'pull' that info from names entered in the scorecard. If you look at the bottom of a scorecard you will notice under the bowling figures that there is a tally for catches, run outs and stumpings, that is where the data is pulled from to allocate championship points.
Also, Plympton should not be relegated regardless of where they finish. WOS have to go.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |