by GWW » Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:52 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:43 pm
GWW wrote:It should have been done that way I agree, but I can't see it ever brought in now.
by redandblack » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:34 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:45 pm
redandblack wrote:WEll, he's been in for a long time now and the SANFL is more popular.
by redandblack » Sun Feb 20, 2011 3:00 pm
by once_were_warriors » Sun Feb 20, 2011 3:48 pm
redandblack wrote::D
The only slight flaw in that argument is that the AFL crowds are at record levels and the TV deal coming up might reach a billion dollars.
I'll send you some straws to grab
by Booney » Sun Feb 20, 2011 3:53 pm
Royal City wrote:
if I had the choice of an extra afl clubs revenue. Or the gov change legislation that sanfl clubs are allowed 60 pokies per club instead of 40. I know what I would choose.
Not saying afl revenue isn't healpful. It's justnot as essential as most make out IMHO!
We would find it tough but could survive without afl dividends. But withoutpokie revenue every club would die Within a month.
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:40 pm
redandblack wrote::D
The only slight flaw in that argument is that the AFL crowds are at record levels and the TV deal coming up might reach a billion dollars.
I'll send you some straws to grab
by redandblack » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:28 pm
Jim05 wrote:redandblack wrote::D
The only slight flaw in that argument is that the AFL crowds are at record levels and the TV deal coming up might reach a billion dollars.
I'll send you some straws to grab
AFL Crowds are up due to the resurgance of the vic clubs. Anytime Collingwood are doing well the crowds will be good.
Demetriou cooks the books to make the figures look good. He programs uneven draws with plenty of blockbusters in victoria. Im an Essendon member and no matter how crap we are going we will always play collingwood and carlton twice
Think you will find crowds in SA are poor and those people are heading back to the SANFL in droves.
by jim5112 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:36 pm
Jim05 wrote:redandblack wrote:Demetriou cooks the books to make the figures look good.
by redandblack » Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:47 pm
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:02 pm
by redandblack » Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:03 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:57 pm
redandblack wrote:jim 5112, you might be a thousand times more than Jim05, but I presume you attributing his quote to me was an inadvertent error.
The question is redirected to you, Jim 05
by Dutchy » Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:59 pm
Jim05 wrote:That is what i mean by cooking the books, he rigs the program each season to gain maximum attendances.While the KPI's look good he keeps his job.
by Jim05 » Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:53 pm
Dutchy wrote:Jim05 wrote:That is what i mean by cooking the books, he rigs the program each season to gain maximum attendances.While the KPI's look good he keeps his job.
Who sets his KPI's? Himself?
Seriously...
by beenreal » Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:11 am
Barto wrote:That would work, assuming AO doesn't go ahead.
The problem is, Port will still probably scream that they're getting dudded. The only advantage is the league doesn't have a liability when they go belly up.
by Royal City » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:11 am
Booney wrote:Royal City wrote:
if I had the choice of an extra afl clubs revenue. Or the gov change legislation that sanfl clubs are allowed 60 pokies per club instead of 40. I know what I would choose.
Not saying afl revenue isn't healpful. It's justnot as essential as most make out IMHO!
We would find it tough but could survive without afl dividends. But withoutpokie revenue every club would die Within a month.
Interesting comment when you consider the amount of posts you have made over the summer relating to how the SANFL divides up ( or uses ) the monies generated from the two SA-based AFL clubs.
Very interesting indeed.
Oh, how dare they use that money to prop up Port Adelaide....blah blah blah
LMFAO
by redandblack » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:21 am
by Royal City » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:27 am
redandblack wrote:Royal City wrote:redandblack wrote:RC, a major part of the SANFL's income is from the 2 AFL teams and AAMI Stadium.
A major part of the SANFL clubs income is the dividend from the SANFL.
Without that dividend, almost every SANFL club would make a loss and find it hard to continue.[/quote
if I had the choice of an extra afl clubs revenue. Or the gov change legislation that sanfl clubs are allowed 60 pokies per club instead of 40. I know what I would choose.
Not saying afl revenue isn't healpful. It's justnot as essential as most make out IMHO!
We would find it tough but could survive without afl dividends. But withoutpokie revenue every club would die Within a month.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |