SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Division 6 Grand Finalists 2011

Adelaide University
7
4%
Blackfriars OS
28
16%
Central United
13
7%
Colonel Light Gardens
18
10%
Glenunga
34
19%
Henley
10
6%
Houghton Districts
7
4%
Ingle Farm
4
2%
Kenilworth
30
17%
Trinity OS
26
15%
 
Total votes : 177

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby scottroo » Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:22 pm

chris delawyer is daniels brother, daniel came runner up in the medal this year, chris is a good player but has to be 100 percent commited or isnt worth the $$$, leshke is from aldinga i think, pretty good player but definately no star
scottroo
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:49 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 183 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby superboot7 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:10 pm

not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade
superboot7
Under 16s
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:31 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby watchdog » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:52 pm

superboot7 wrote:not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade


Another NH person talking down NH when we all know you've had plenty on the track? Reading some of your previous post you dont rate div 6 at all. So Havens must be in for a huge year in 2011. Also you dont have to look good in a GF all you have to do is win. WC will do just fine in div 5. 2008 Westminster went up from div 6 and are now in div 4 and in 2009 Hectorville went up from div 6 and are now in div 4. Almost could have added Brahma to that category as well.
watchdog
Under 18s
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby watchdog » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:53 pm

scottroo wrote:chris delawyer is daniels brother, daniel came runner up in the medal this year, chris is a good player but has to be 100 percent commited or isnt worth the $$$, leshke is from aldinga i think, pretty good player but definately no star


Chris is probably regarded as the better player of the 2, or at least was a couple of years ago
watchdog
Under 18s
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby Darth Demon » Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:00 pm

zedman wrote:yeah i do but i aint telling :P yet..

darth: imo 5th was a bad result and i know ppl at KFC agree..they recruited at least 12 A grade players of which 4-5 we were told would make a huge splash in this "grade", they didnt..had 6 -10 good u/18s become available for senior selection..had a B grade who won the flag(depth?) plus the return of salisbury to their rucking division and osborn from injury/work to full forward full time..and they fell another half a grade in theory..


100% agree! Too many agenda's, Too many chiefs, Too b@#%^y hard let's stack the B grade!

But can you imagine the cries of sore loser had I said anything different. The greatest lot of Front Running Under Achievers I've ever seen.... next to your mob of course! ;)
User avatar
Darth Demon
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:45 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 21 times
Grassroots Team: United Aboriginal

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby watchdog » Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:06 pm

Darth Demon wrote:
zedman wrote:yeah i do but i aint telling :P yet..

darth: imo 5th was a bad result and i know ppl at KFC agree..they recruited at least 12 A grade players of which 4-5 we were told would make a huge splash in this "grade", they didnt..had 6 -10 good u/18s become available for senior selection..had a B grade who won the flag(depth?) plus the return of salisbury to their rucking division and osborn from injury/work to full forward full time..and they fell another half a grade in theory..


100% agree! Too many agenda's, Too many chiefs, Too b@#%^y hard let's stack the B grade!

But can you imagine the cries of sore loser had I said anything different. The greatest lot of Front Running Under Achievers I've ever seen.... next to your mob of course! ;)


Darth sounds like you guys may have a couple of very handy ins to cover some of the loses. Good luck this year.
watchdog
Under 18s
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby scottroo » Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:20 pm

watchdog, there different kinds of players, daniel the nuggerty onballer while chris plays taller, if i had to chose one it would be daniel
scottroo
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:49 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 183 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby zedman » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:00 am

darth..but for some mickan skill you would have been licking wounds in div 6 again..be fair..CLG did all that they could last year to be their best..you guys and WCFC were the 2 best teams..no underachieving last year ;)
zedman
Coach
 
Posts: 6464
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:48 pm
Has liked: 1089 times
Been liked: 387 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby Darth Demon » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:16 am

zedman wrote:darth..but for some mickan skill you would have been licking wounds in div 6 again..be fair..CLG did all that they could last year to be their best..you guys and WCFC were the 2 best teams..no underachieving last year ;)


Possibly a Fair Call Zed but an inch is as good as a mile. Knew I'd get a reasponse tho! Enjoy yourself it's not worth doing if you don't 8)
User avatar
Darth Demon
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:45 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 21 times
Grassroots Team: United Aboriginal

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby Darth Demon » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:25 am

watchdog wrote:
Darth Demon wrote:
zedman wrote:yeah i do but i aint telling :P yet..

darth: imo 5th was a bad result and i know ppl at KFC agree..they recruited at least 12 A grade players of which 4-5 we were told would make a huge splash in this "grade", they didnt..had 6 -10 good u/18s become available for senior selection..had a B grade who won the flag(depth?) plus the return of salisbury to their rucking division and osborn from injury/work to full forward full time..and they fell another half a grade in theory..


100% agree! Too many agenda's, Too many chiefs, Too b@#%^y hard let's stack the B grade!

But can you imagine the cries of sore loser had I said anything different. The greatest lot of Front Running Under Achievers I've ever seen.... next to your mob of course! ;)


Darth sounds like you guys may have a couple of very handy ins to cover some of the loses. Good luck this year.


I'm grazing in another paddock up in the Hills. Relaxing and just watching for a year or two. Thought I would try something completly different! Very much out of the loop WD but does look like some BIG SHOES to fill in the Mid Field and up forward - No one's IN yet that is in that class - still always had a knack of recruiting well when needed tho! Good luck to all! 8)
User avatar
Darth Demon
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:45 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 21 times
Grassroots Team: United Aboriginal

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby Boosh » Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:43 am

watchdog wrote:
superboot7 wrote:not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade


Another NH person talking down NH when we all know you've had plenty on the track? Reading some of your previous post you dont rate div 6 at all. So Havens must be in for a huge year in 2011. Also you dont have to look good in a GF all you have to do is win. WC will do just fine in div 5. 2008 Westminster went up from div 6 and are now in div 4 and in 2009 Hectorville went up from div 6 and are now in div 4. Almost could have added Brahma to that category as well.


Numbers have been solid NH but no more or less than last year, we will have a very similar team to last year with a couple ins and a couple outs which will be reflected by the clearance lists the SAAFL publish so there is no hiding.

I reckon there is a huge gap between the bottom of Div 5 and the bottom of Div 6 but the top of Div 6 would be stronger than the bottom of div 5 if you get my meaning. So I think with the team as is we will be well above the bottom few sides but probably 4 or 5 quality players short of being a real contender. We will be relying on a rapid improvement from our younger players if we want to be around the mark.

On Kenilworth 12 players in the first week of the clearance window being open is a big indication of their intentions regardless of what anyone says.
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
User avatar
Boosh
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:42 pm
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 192 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby superboot7 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:52 am

[quote="watchdog"][quote="superboot7"]not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade[/quote]

Another NH person talking down NH when we all know you've had plenty on the track? Reading some of your previous post you dont rate div 6 at all. So Havens must be in for a huge year in 2011. Also you dont have to look good in a GF all you have to do is win. WC will do just fine in div 5. 2008 Westminster went up from div 6 and are now in div 4 and in 2009 Hectorville went up from div 6 and are now in div 4. Almost could have added Brahma to that category as well.[/quote]

Don't believe Haven will have a cracker year at all, no expectations what so ever. Hope they do well. But NO Watchdog - I do not rate D6 at all. Its very unfortunate that Haven are there after being finalist in div 4 from i think 04 TO 08.
superboot7
Under 16s
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:31 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby superlative steve » Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:56 am

Anyone who rates D6 is a joke. Your playing against C grade sides....
superlative steve
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:57 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 30 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby watchdog » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:19 am

superlative steve wrote:Anyone who rates D6 is a joke. Your playing against C grade sides....


Fair call but in due respect Henley c grade were belted in a lot of games. Losing 8 or 9 by about 10 goals or more. 4 or 5 of those by 15 goals or more and smashed by 30 goals in 2 games last year.
watchdog
Under 18s
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby dee man » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:31 am

superlative steve wrote:Anyone who rates D6 is a joke. Your playing against C grade sides....

its good to be able to read your unbelievable knowledge in div 6.
westminster,hope valley,brahma lodge and hectorville have all recently came out of the joke division and made their way up the league ladders.
west croydon and lockleys will both make good accounts of themselves this year.
i believe you might under estimate the level that the better clubs play at in div jokeville but how can i debate with any chance against a person with such wisdom and footy knowledge.
we stand as one
we fight as one
we win and lose as one
we are one
User avatar
dee man
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:02 pm
Location: croydon park
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby S Demon » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:40 am

superboot7 wrote:not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade


...and yet in the C6 thread it states that they will definitely have a C grade
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4611
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:44 am
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 314 times
Been liked: 372 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby The Ash Man » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:58 am

watchdog wrote:
superboot7 wrote:not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade


Another NH person talking down NH when we all know you've had plenty on the track? Reading some of your previous post you dont rate div 6 at all. So Havens must be in for a huge year in 2011. Also you dont have to look good in a GF all you have to do is win. WC will do just fine in div 5. 2008 Westminster went up from div 6 and are now in div 4 and in 2009 Hectorville went up from div 6 and are now in div 4. Almost could have added Brahma to that category as well.


:?
Thats like saying you could add CLG to that category
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby watchdog » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:20 am

The Ash Man wrote:
watchdog wrote:
superboot7 wrote:not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade


Another NH person talking down NH when we all know you've had plenty on the track? Reading some of your previous post you dont rate div 6 at all. So Havens must be in for a huge year in 2011. Also you dont have to look good in a GF all you have to do is win. WC will do just fine in div 5. 2008 Westminster went up from div 6 and are now in div 4 and in 2009 Hectorville went up from div 6 and are now in div 4. Almost could have added Brahma to that category as well.


:?
Thats like saying you could add CLG to that category


Sorry badly put although. My point is that the 2 sides that went up from div 6 to div 5 last year lost only 4 minor round games for the year.
watchdog
Under 18s
 
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby Boosh » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:36 am

S Demon wrote:
superboot7 wrote:not that there's anyone really talking Kennelworth up, but lets get things in perspective.... If yor going from Hills or Southern Leagues to Div 6 it's fair to say your no game breaker and if they were knocked out in an elimination final, I'd say they'd need a good few players, as I've heard West Croydon were smashing most sides and they didn't look that s*&t hot in the G.F.
If it were 12 recruits to Salisbury North, you'd have something to worry about. At least they've picked up 9 more than hAVEN. They may not even fill a B-grade


...and yet in the C6 thread it states that they will definitely have a C grade


Haven will have a C Grade, the same blokes that have played C grade for years will get a team up and running they always manage to somehow
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
User avatar
Boosh
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:42 pm
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 192 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: SAAFL Div 6 & Div 6R (2011)

Postby Boosh » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:38 am

watchdog wrote:
superlative steve wrote:Anyone who rates D6 is a joke. Your playing against C grade sides....


Fair call but in due respect Henley c grade were belted in a lot of games. Losing 8 or 9 by about 10 goals or more. 4 or 5 of those by 15 goals or more and smashed by 30 goals in 2 games last year.


I agree as i said earlier the bottom of div 6 is very ordinary but the top is better than the bottom of div 5 and north haven will find themselves in the middle somewhere.

What club are you from Watchdog?
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
User avatar
Boosh
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:42 pm
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 192 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jo172 and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |