by Jim05 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:11 am
by southee » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:18 am
HOORAY PUNT wrote:Big call calling Clarrie arrogant when you think South will finish 4th after their bottom last year and contuinous letting down of their meager supporter base for the last 30 years with the crop they could have picked.
Sturt finished 1/2 game of 3rd last year remember , interesting to see this thread raised again in Sept I think.
South suupporters should just sit quiet for a while before they gain some respect.
by HOORAY PUNT » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:32 am
by southee » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:39 am
HOORAY PUNT wrote:It did ask for predictions ,then you came on and shot down Clarrie then have a go at me , yet you have the audacity to do the same .
Good luck with your prediction.
by redandblack » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:12 am
by DOC » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:13 am
HOORAY PUNT wrote:It did ask for predictions ,then you came on and shot down Clarrie then have a go at me , yet you have the audacity to do the same .
Good luck with your prediction.
by sapaul » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:27 am
by blueandwhite » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:30 am
by Grahaml » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:54 am
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:21 am
by redandblack » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:29 am
by The Apostle » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:52 am
by The Apostle » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:53 am
Grahaml wrote:There are some wildly different predictions going on here. A sign of an even comp, or just a lot of unknowns? Or perhaps just some wishful thinking?
by Grahaml » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:12 am
redandblack wrote:With apologies to the Norwood fans, I'm at a loss to know why it's accepted that they will be automatically top three.
I thought their midfield was the best in the comp last year. They've lost Trotter, Lower and Weatherald from that which is a huge loss. Campbell will be a fitter good addition and I don't know much about Suckling, but their midfield looks dramatically weaker at first look and will need someone stepping up from the other players to supplement Zorzi and Gallagher.
I thought their defensive game plan (yes, said without a wink) worked because of the pace of their transition from defence, through Puopolo and Duigan. Both gone. Gorringe didn't play much, but I'd think there will be a lot of pressure on dawe. Are there any other ruckmen to help him?
I don't think much is lost with Nitschke and Lee going, although Nitschke was an honest, depth player. Roberts is a loss as a young up-and-comer and I don't know much about Savage, except as a promising juinior.
Coming back, I remember Littler as a handy utility who could play midfield if necessary. Eagleton should add penetration and experience, Jericho is Jericho, Pfeiffer - who knows, Bode is an average back flanker and I can't see Johns getting a league game.
All in all, the ''outs'' are far more than the ''ins'', which means you're relying on Bassett to make the difference. If he does, then I'll be the first to acknowledge it and good luck to him.
PS: God help you if Rowe gets injured.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:33 am
The Apostle AK wrote:Grahaml wrote:There are some wildly different predictions going on here. A sign of an even comp, or just a lot of unknowns? Or perhaps just some wishful thinking?
Perhaps NFI...
by The Apostle » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:49 am
The Apostle AK wrote:Premiers: Glenelg (you will witness grown men openly weeping on GF day!)
Runners up: Eagles (up there)
3: Central (due for a drop)
4: Port (need to win close matches)
5: Norwood (lost to much talent)
by dedja » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:52 am
by csbowes » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:16 pm
by LPH » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:23 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:28 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |