
by smac » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:15 pm
by westcoastpanther » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:33 pm
by westcoastpanther » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:02 pm
by westcoastpanther » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:07 pm
by RoosterMarty » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:19 pm
by spell_check » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:30 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Scrap the Shield and just play T20 I reckon.
by Media Park » Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:34 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by OnSong » Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:35 pm
by toot toot » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:10 pm
by Media Park » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:17 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Jim05 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:18 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Scrap the Shield and just play T20 I reckon.
by cripple » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:30 pm
by Bulls forever » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:41 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:43 pm
cripple wrote:no one watches the real stuff so who cares
by Jim05 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:44 pm
Bulls forever wrote:All out now, I did say yesterday that the batting was short, well, proof is in the performance. Has Hilditch infiltrated the SACA.
by Bulls forever » Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:07 pm
Jim05 wrote:Bulls forever wrote:All out now, I did say yesterday that the batting was short, well, proof is in the performance. Has Hilditch infiltrated the SACA.
Yeah i agree we went in a batsman short i feel. If haberfield is batting 8 we have big problems. A number 9 or 10 at best
by cripple » Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:12 pm
Bulls forever wrote:Jim05 wrote:Bulls forever wrote:All out now, I did say yesterday that the batting was short, well, proof is in the performance. Has Hilditch infiltrated the SACA.
Yeah i agree we went in a batsman short i feel. If haberfield is batting 8 we have big problems. A number 9 or 10 at best
Yeah I care as well, Haberfield is only a No. 10 if Peter George is playing. Same old problems 1/100 to 5/150, bit different to 4/30. Can't win matches if no runs from batters.
by Bulls forever » Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:25 pm
cripple wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Jim05 wrote:Bulls forever wrote:All out now, I did say yesterday that the batting was short, well, proof is in the performance. Has Hilditch infiltrated the SACA.
Yeah i agree we went in a batsman short i feel. If haberfield is batting 8 we have big problems. A number 9 or 10 at best
Yeah I care as well, Haberfield is only a No. 10 if Peter George is playing. Same old problems 1/100 to 5/150, bit different to 4/30. Can't win matches if no runs from batters.
Dont get me wrong, i do care (why else would i check the score). Its just such a let down after the big bash IMO
by brod » Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:28 pm
Bulls forever wrote:All out now, I did say yesterday that the batting was short, well, proof is in the performance. Has Hilditch infiltrated the SACA.
by brod » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:08 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |