How can Wozniacki be no.1 (by a long way) when she's never won a grand slam (in the last year - Aus SF, US SF, Wim 4R, Fre QF)
Clijsters has won the US and now Australian and was QF at Wimbledon ...

by dedja » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:29 am
by dedja » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:34 am
FlyingHigh wrote:dedja wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Why either party over the last ten years has not made a genuine commitment to ensuring by, say, 2015, all new home and small office airconditioning units have to be solar powered.
That I do understand ... let's just say the fossil fuel industry can be a tad influencial
Well, yes, perhaps I was being a little naive.
Still crap IMO.
by bayman » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:54 am
Barto wrote:bayman wrote:Barto wrote:I don't understand people who are given information in confidence, then proceed to spray it all around a public forum..
COMMANDER BARTO, if that is directed mainly at me, i always ask whether i can post it first & as you know i pm'd you a while back & told you to expect an announcement within the next week or so & seeing i couldn't trust you i couldn't tell you & was told not to post it & for those reading it was unley ovals new name which was announced 3 or 4 days after the pm to commander barto
Interesting rant. In that PM you stated:
If it was told in confidence and you have respect for your source, why were you messaging people that you don't know with it? Why mention it on the main board anyway?
Forums like this provide a degree of anonymity to allow blokes like yourself to come out with the "ooh ooh, I know something you dont know.. get this.." when back in the day someone like yourself had inside info, you'd have been on the phone to KG and spilled it on there. The difference is, the voice wouldve been recognised by whoever would've told you and the flow of info would've dried up real quick. On here it just takes a few more weeks for people at the club to work out who you are.
by sherminator » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:16 pm
JAS wrote:A Mum wrote:I don't understand why so many 'kids' have their facebook profiles set to 'public' for the whole world to see??
Silly !
Because the 'attention seeking' part of their brain totally overrules any comprehension of the potential risks...silly indeed.
Regards
JAS
by Johno6 » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:22 pm
by bayman » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:38 pm
sherminator wrote:JAS wrote:A Mum wrote:I don't understand why so many 'kids' have their facebook profiles set to 'public' for the whole world to see??
Silly !
Because the 'attention seeking' part of their brain totally overrules any comprehension of the potential risks...silly indeed.
Regards
JAS
I get these 'friend requests' from random people that I don't know, many of whom are teenage girls because through sport I am friends with some of their friends. I always have a look to see if I have actually met them first before I reject. All of these girls have personal details, photos etc that I can see. It is a little bit scary that these kids are openly throwing out photos of themselves, phone numbers etc to random people. Is there some sort of competition to gain the most 'friends' or something? The incident down at Pt Elliot with that young girl a couple of years ago springs to mind.
by Barto » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:42 pm
bayman wrote:that isn't the one & you know it, that's the one where i trusted you, barto if you continue to 'bait me' i will let on (in code) some delicate issues from your club.....as for keeping pms why ?all it is the schoolgirl mentality (very childish)(apolgies to the smarter schoolgirls out there) .......your just dirty that someone knows something before you & btw i've never rang KG in my life, infact the only sportshow i've ever rung has been on 5rph & with your reply it is now obvious it was me you meant
by White Line Fever » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:51 pm
by dedja » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:11 pm
White Line Fever wrote:how skippy untied the horses to save Aunt Evelyn in todays episode
by Johno6 » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:13 pm
dedja wrote:White Line Fever wrote:how skippy untied the horses to save Aunt Evelyn in todays episode
Gold ...
by dedja » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:17 pm
by CK » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:56 pm
Johno6 wrote:dedja wrote:White Line Fever wrote:how skippy untied the horses to save Aunt Evelyn in todays episode
Gold ...
ditto
by dedja » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:56 pm
by Q. » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:27 pm
heater31 wrote:Quichey wrote:Because State-sanctioned murder is still murder and the punishment neither deters nor rehabilitates.
but it also serves as a severe deterrent and eliminates the problem eventually...
by Q. » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:33 pm
Footy Chick wrote:tipper wrote:one could also argue that the current penalty, imprisonment, also doesnt rehabilitate, yet that is the current practice, and eventually lets these scum back into society.
Perhaps if prisons were actually returned to places of hard labour and abhorrent conditions as opposed to the virtual hotels they are at the minute, then it might be a deterrent.
and don't anyone bother coming back with "prisoners rights"It's an oxymoron - they're in prison, they're not supposed to have any rights...
by White Line Fever » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:50 pm
by Bully » Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:00 pm
by heater31 » Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:48 pm
Bulldog wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/i-won-485000-they-wont-pay/story-e6frea6u-1225996687100
why people cant follow ther rules. After reading this article it looks like the fella put in a lotto ticket after the draw closed . And now hes complaining about not being paid as his numbers came up in draw 981 but his ticket had draw 982. He needs to realise that he deosnt win squat. This to me if this guy wins this money will open a door up to all that have had winning tickets the following draw from the previous drawn numbers. God i would have won alot if this can happen.
by CK » Mon Jan 31, 2011 1:08 pm
by mickey » Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |