
by spell_check » Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:23 pm
by heater31 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:49 pm
Bulldog wrote:Adelaide doesnt have something like this to get out of the city for a few hours thats not to far. Victor is there but its not really established as a great place to visit. I think for a start you need to introduce compulsory council voting. Might kick some of the dead beats out of the chambers that get to comfortable down there. its compulsory up here.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:08 pm
Psyber wrote:It is horses for courses I guess.Footy Chick wrote:Psyber wrote:If I had to live in a capital city or suburban environment I'd choose Melbourne just for the better air quality.![]()
Melbourne has such good air quality you can't even see the CBD until you get to Footscray for all the smog.
Great choice
My judgement is based on personal experience and influenced by personal sensitivities:
1. My wife's asthma gave her less trouble during our 10 years in Melbourne than it did here - even when we lived in an inner area - Malvern.
2. My own tendency to skin and upper respiratory tract issues did better there too - here I have to live outside the city.
I agree that Melbourne's skies look grey from outside, but Melbourne is much more clear on the eastern side than in its west.
[Although my wife was reasonably OK in Point Cook visiting friends too, but that may have just been a few good days.]
Adelaide's skies tend to be brown in the Summer and the murk never seems to clear.
That may be an effect of the hills forming a bowl into which the prevailing wind blows.
I had hoped to be able to live somewhere like Stonyfell, when I returned in 2009.
But, while staying with friends there while house hunting in January 2009, I developed the chronic cough that I never had in Melbourne within a few days.
[Admittedly, not as severely as when I stayed with friend in Davoren Park.]
by Drop Bear » Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:27 pm
by Darth Vader » Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:59 pm
fish wrote:I have visited over 30 countries on 4 continents and agree that Adelaide is a very liveable city!
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:52 pm
by Q. » Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:04 pm
by Magpiespower » Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:51 am
sherminator wrote:This article makes me laugh as it highlights the arrogance and attitude of Sydney-siders! Firstly, the article emphasises Sydney being the lowest ranked city rather than Adelaide being the highest. Secondly, it shows that Sydney-siders believe the world revolves completely around them! How dare a survey show that Sydney isn't the greatest place in the world! It must be wrong!!
I know so many people from Adelaide who have moved to Sydney over the years and raved about how great it is for career, nightlife, beaches, events etc. in the first few months. With the exception of 1 or 2, every single one of them are now back in Adelaide citing affordability, relaxed lifestyle etc. I live in the heart of the McLaren Vale wine region and (despite it's recent massive population growth) I think it is great. Countless local wineries, restaurants, cafes etc., 10 mins to the beach (Pt. Noarlunga, Moana, Aldinga, Maslins, etc), 30 mins to Victor, 40 mins (on a good day) to the CBD. Very 'livable'.
by AFLflyer » Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:07 am
Psyber wrote:It is horses for courses I guess.Footy Chick wrote:Psyber wrote:If I had to live in a capital city or suburban environment I'd choose Melbourne just for the better air quality.![]()
Melbourne has such good air quality you can't even see the CBD until you get to Footscray for all the smog.
Great choice
My judgement is based on personal experience and influenced by personal sensitivities:
1. My wife's asthma gave her less trouble during our 10 years in Melbourne than it did here - even when we lived in an inner area - Malvern.
2. My own tendency to skin and upper respiratory tract issues did better there too - here I have to live outside the city.
I agree that Melbourne's skies look grey from outside, but Melbourne is much more clear on the eastern side than in its west.
[Although my wife was reasonably OK in Point Cook visiting friends too, but that may have just been a few good days.]
Adelaide's skies tend to be brown in the Summer and the murk never seems to clear.
That may be an effect of the hills forming a bowl into which the prevailing wind blows.
I had hoped to be able to live somewhere like Stonyfell, when I returned in 2009.
But, while staying with friends there while house hunting in January 2009, I developed the chronic cough that I never had in Melbourne within a few days.
[Admittedly, not as severely as when I stayed with friend in Davoren Park.]
by lebron » Tue Jan 25, 2011 10:50 am
by White Line Fever » Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:10 am
by Psyber » Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:11 am
They look brown when you look down from the hills as you are driving in. I first noticed it in the early 1980s.AFLflyer wrote: why dont you return to melbourne then?
IMO, you dont get bluer skies than here in Adelaide, interesting comment about brown skies?
by Gingernuts » Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:12 am
by Q. » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:43 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:26 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Adelaide's perhaps the most livable city if your over 55 and don't like change.
lebron wrote:Adelaide? More like Radelaide! That is all!
by AFLflyer » Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:28 pm
by Turbo » Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:29 pm
White Line Fever wrote:I love Adelaide because my family, friends dogs etc are all here.
BUT this place is a hole.
Crap casino, no riverside dining in city, footy stadium in middle of nowhere, can't build a building more than 3 stories without approval, our city skyline looks sh!t, public transport is a joke, roads are designed for 600,000 people, North-South sprawl getting ridiculous instead of urdan development, South Rd is possibly the biggest bottleneck Main Road on Earth, no dining establishment is open past 10pm ever, the nightlife is dead apart from the month of March, we don't have a powerful industry as most big companies are not based in Adelaide & never will be, we have nothing near us (Perth or Melbourne??), bands miss us, Oprah doesn't know we exist, and we are only known as city of churches.
We have miles to go to be a better city.
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:17 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:19 pm
AFLflyer wrote:yeah i agree too. and dont forget the natural attractions we have here, very close to the city! excellent beaches down south, and the hills countryside and winery regions are world class. and i get koalas in my backyard![]()
not a bad place at all i reckon.
just push city development ahead (ie adelaide oval and developments) and it will be even better.
we need the young to push our state forward into the future.
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:31 pm
Bulldog wrote:yes i can see that Adelaide would be the best city to live in. No traffic
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |