





by wycbloods » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:41 am
by stampy » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:42 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Fair similarity between the current Pommy performance, and ours back in the Golden years.
- Bowlers bowling to a plan, with patience and constricting the batsmen
- Batting deep - Often the Aussies would look in strife (by their standards) at 5/200 odd and the Opposition would be buoyant, only to have S Waugh, Gilchrist or Healy partner up with the tail and double (or more) the score.
- Multiple partnerships of 100 or more.
And as it was our opportunity back in the day to bask in our moment of glory, so too now the Poms have earned that right.
by mal » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:44 am
wycbloods wrote:Johnson taken for 22 off his over by Swann and Tremlett![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Drop Bear » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:45 am
stampy wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Fair similarity between the current Pommy performance, and ours back in the Golden years.
- Bowlers bowling to a plan, with patience and constricting the batsmen
- Batting deep - Often the Aussies would look in strife (by their standards) at 5/200 odd and the Opposition would be buoyant, only to have S Waugh, Gilchrist or Healy partner up with the tail and double (or more) the score.
- Multiple partnerships of 100 or more.
And as it was our opportunity back in the day to bask in our moment of glory, so too now the Poms have earned that right.
spot on, it is very similar to our domination over them over all those series
by Jase » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:52 am
mal wrote:Jase wrote:mal wrote:Australian selectors have blundered AGAIN this summer
It is always a risk playing 2 spinners
Why is it a risk?
To pick 2 spinners you rely too much on bowling last in the match .....
AU 280
EG 7/584
PRIOR 111*[120]
BRESNAN 35 *[97]
This is disgustingly painful too watch
2 decisions have cost AU in this innings
COOK 46 -189 after that Beer no ball
BELL 67-115 after the cheat rorted the reFERAL system
Cost AU 191 runs
BUT you have to create opportuities to cover whatever happens in a game of cricket
Cheat how...? I hope you're not talking about Bell...? How many Aussies walk...?
2 page spread in todays press about it
Crowd BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOED Bell
Radio media have commeneted about Bell
BELL rorted the rules
Good luck to him, he gotta away with it
Ive been advocating for sometime now that a batter will eventually be let off the hook through a frivoulous reFERAL
Here is an extract from the media
BELL WAS 67 WHEN HE NICKED A WATSON DELIVERY TO KEEPER BRAD HADDIN
IT WAS THE LOUDEST NOISE BY A bell SINCE BIG BEN STRUCK MIDNIGHT ON NEW YEARS EVE. HE BELTED IT
In my eyes BELL cheated and RORTED the system
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:59 am
by JK » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:00 pm
by bayman » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:01 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:03 pm
by Jase » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:04 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:"Cheat" was once a very volatile word to throw around ... Bell had an option at his disposal and he took it, then the authorities adjudicated beyond his control.
To refer to him as a cheat is ridiculous imho.
by mal » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:05 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:07 pm
Interceptor wrote:Don't recall the 86/87 side being flogged anywhere as badly as in this Ashes series.
With the possibility of a 3rd innings defeat coming up, is this the worst side ever on home soil?
by Gingernuts » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:11 pm
Jim05 wrote:Interceptor wrote:Don't recall the 86/87 side being flogged anywhere as badly as in this Ashes series.
With the possibility of a 3rd innings defeat coming up, is this the worst side ever on home soil?
Must go close. This is pathetic. We are not playing the world champs, we are playing a team ranked one spot higher than us. Absolute disgrace
by JK » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:12 pm
Jase wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:"Cheat" was once a very volatile word to throw around ... Bell had an option at his disposal and he took it, then the authorities adjudicated beyond his control.
To refer to him as a cheat is ridiculous imho.
Exactly, he used a current rule (not one that I particularly agree with) to his advantage...
That's not cheating...
Claiming half volley catches on the other hand
by Jase » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:13 pm
mal wrote:JASE
I will call any batsman a cheat including Australian players
The reFERAL system has created the BELL debacle
I will re-iterate he used the system and blatantly disgustingly rorted it
Your defintion of CHEAT is correct
BUT
the IN MY EYES the cheat reference still sticks
Here is another media quote
DAR GAVE BELL OUT
THE ENGLISHMAN STARTED TO WALK OFF B4 DECIDING HE MAY AS WELL ASK FOR VIDEO VERIFICATION
IF BELL WAS INNOCENT, HE WOULD HAVE REFERRED IT STRAIGHT AWAY
Everyone on the ground would have known it was out
BELL then made a mockery and rorted the situation
As the great ADELAIDE HAWK said
When you give adjudications to the players they will take advantage
PS
IF they used SNICKO all this frogcrapp prob would not have happened
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:16 pm
by mal » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:23 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:26 pm
by Jase » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:34 pm
mal wrote:Retraction BELL didnt CHEAT
RE-iteration IN MY EYES he cheated
The bubbleheaded boobys that are ruining the game are the reFERAL lawmakers
The referal system that allows GAYLE and WATTO to use it for some approximately 15/85 decisions on fluke, becoz they are opening batters
The same system that does often deprives tailenders like BENN and BOLLINGER the right because others have used up the 2 appeals b4 them
The same system that allows the what the hec reFERALs such as BELLs
The same system that overides disMissALs becoz the umps think it might have been a no ball by the bowler
The sad part about BELLgate is the rafferty rule process
Had the Poms used up their 2 reFERALs, BELL would have walked off without all this crapp
by dedja » Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:35 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |