by RustyCage » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:24 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:26 am
by RustyCage » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:58 am
by RustyCage » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:59 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:2 tests in 2010?? or is that counting the whole series 09/10?
I thought they only played the 1 test in 2010 that he played in - SCG NY test.
by Mad Mat » Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:12 am
am Bays wrote:Well done to the boys on the Hill tonight, first three wickets all coincided with them getting a Mexican wave going. Did O'Keefe turn any tonight all I saw was batsmen playing for the turn and getting bowled/missing straight ones.
'Ritz the best slow bowler I saw tonight
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:46 am
Mad Mat wrote:am Bays wrote:Well done to the boys on the Hill tonight, first three wickets all coincided with them getting a Mexican wave going. Did O'Keefe turn any tonight all I saw was batsmen playing for the turn and getting bowled/missing straight ones.
'Ritz the best slow bowler I saw tonight
The Mexican wave. Didn't that die out 10 years ago? To the bogans on the hill thanks for the trip down memory lane.
Some bewildering decisions by Klinger/Berry (whoever calls the shots) last night. Pollard only bowling 3 overs? He had the best figures of all the SA bowlers and Klinger gives the ball to Christian in the last over. Pollard batting at 7 and below Manou?????? Should be at 5 or 6, not 7. Highlight of the night was Moises's over that went for 29.
Noticed on the way into the ground that Pollard and Rashid were only getting to the gates at the Bradman Stand less than an hour before the start. On entering the ground I noticed that their team mates and the NSW players were already out on the ground warming up. Luckily Pollard performed. Didn't see much to get excited about with Rashid.
by dark & stormy » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:05 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:19 am
Smasha wrote:rashid , at the moment money wasted. for a high profile player (well sort of) should be doing something, bowled half trackers.
thank god for pollard is all we can say..... oh and tait should take a page out of lee,s book and see how you should be bowling.
no point bowling 150plus if it just crap...........imo
by dark & stormy » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:23 am
I would agree with that tait doesnt like bowling to warner , but then again who would . that man is a freak..... we shall see on saturday if tait is good enough still. heres hoping.Lightning McQueen wrote:Smasha wrote:rashid , at the moment money wasted. for a high profile player (well sort of) should be doing something, bowled half trackers.
thank god for pollard is all we can say..... oh and tait should take a page out of lee,s book and see how you should be bowling.
no point bowling 150plus if it just crap...........imo
I don't think he would've had a high price tag, I think he is like a woodstock bourbon, does the job, fills the void at a reasonable price, he's no Jack Daniels. I reckon we were a bit stumped on who was available at the time and settled for the cheaper option that we could get for the whole tournament.
As for Tait, first game back, he was always going to be rusty, I think he has a psychological problem bowling to Warner, why wouldn't you open with him? His meare presence out there I think plays on Tait's mind, I'd say they were hoping to get rid of Warner early then unleash "The Wild Thing".
by MatteeG » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:28 am
smithy wrote:I could find an article saying that Kevin Higgins, Steven trigg and Rick davies are good coaches.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:29 am
Smasha wrote:I would agree with that tait doesnt like bowling to warner , but then again who would . that man is a freak..... we shall see on saturday if tait is good enough still. heres hoping.Lightning McQueen wrote:
I don't think he would've had a high price tag, I think he is like a woodstock bourbon, does the job, fills the void at a reasonable price, he's no Jack Daniels. I reckon we were a bit stumped on who was available at the time and settled for the cheaper option that we could get for the whole tournament.
As for Tait, first game back, he was always going to be rusty, I think he has a psychological problem bowling to Warner, why wouldn't you open with him? His meare presence out there I think plays on Tait's mind, I'd say they were hoping to get rid of Warner early then unleash "The Wild Thing".
by Drop Bear » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:38 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Smasha wrote:I would agree with that tait doesnt like bowling to warner , but then again who would . that man is a freak..... we shall see on saturday if tait is good enough still. heres hoping.Lightning McQueen wrote:
I don't think he would've had a high price tag, I think he is like a woodstock bourbon, does the job, fills the void at a reasonable price, he's no Jack Daniels. I reckon we were a bit stumped on who was available at the time and settled for the cheaper option that we could get for the whole tournament.
As for Tait, first game back, he was always going to be rusty, I think he has a psychological problem bowling to Warner, why wouldn't you open with him? His meare presence out there I think plays on Tait's mind, I'd say they were hoping to get rid of Warner early then unleash "The Wild Thing".
He certainly loves playing against SA and has Tait's measure, he loves to ball coming on quickly.
by Jim05 » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:48 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Smasha wrote:I would agree with that tait doesnt like bowling to warner , but then again who would . that man is a freak..... we shall see on saturday if tait is good enough still. heres hoping.Lightning McQueen wrote:
I don't think he would've had a high price tag, I think he is like a woodstock bourbon, does the job, fills the void at a reasonable price, he's no Jack Daniels. I reckon we were a bit stumped on who was available at the time and settled for the cheaper option that we could get for the whole tournament.
As for Tait, first game back, he was always going to be rusty, I think he has a psychological problem bowling to Warner, why wouldn't you open with him? His meare presence out there I think plays on Tait's mind, I'd say they were hoping to get rid of Warner early then unleash "The Wild Thing".
He certainly loves playing against SA and has Tait's measure, he loves to ball coming on quickly.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:50 am
Jim05 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Smasha wrote:I would agree with that tait doesnt like bowling to warner , but then again who would . that man is a freak..... we shall see on saturday if tait is good enough still. heres hoping.Lightning McQueen wrote:
I don't think he would've had a high price tag, I think he is like a woodstock bourbon, does the job, fills the void at a reasonable price, he's no Jack Daniels. I reckon we were a bit stumped on who was available at the time and settled for the cheaper option that we could get for the whole tournament.
As for Tait, first game back, he was always going to be rusty, I think he has a psychological problem bowling to Warner, why wouldn't you open with him? His meare presence out there I think plays on Tait's mind, I'd say they were hoping to get rid of Warner early then unleash "The Wild Thing".
He certainly loves playing against SA and has Tait's measure, he loves to ball coming on quickly.
Maybehe loves playing at ao. Sign him up if they dont want him. He is not part of their ss plans and he has test aspirations
by smithy » Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:47 am
MatteeG wrote:smithy wrote:I could find an article saying that Kevin Higgins, Steven trigg and Rick davies are good coaches.
Liar...
by MadMax » Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:33 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Smasha wrote:I would agree with that tait doesnt like bowling to warner , but then again who would . that man is a freak..... we shall see on saturday if tait is good enough still. heres hoping.Lightning McQueen wrote:
I don't think he would've had a high price tag, I think he is like a woodstock bourbon, does the job, fills the void at a reasonable price, he's no Jack Daniels. I reckon we were a bit stumped on who was available at the time and settled for the cheaper option that we could get for the whole tournament.
As for Tait, first game back, he was always going to be rusty, I think he has a psychological problem bowling to Warner, why wouldn't you open with him? His meare presence out there I think plays on Tait's mind, I'd say they were hoping to get rid of Warner early then unleash "The Wild Thing".
He certainly loves playing against SA and has Tait's measure, he loves to ball coming on quickly.
by CoverKing » Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:55 pm
by Bulls forever » Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:39 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:09 pm
by Gozu » Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:33 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |