by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:20 am
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:22 am
Gunnerson wrote:OKC. So then a umpire is not aloud a bad day?
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:24 am
OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:OKC. So then a umpire is not aloud a bad day?
Yes,
But if i had a bad day every week, i would be dropped. As should the umpires.
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:26 am
Gunnerson wrote:OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:OKC. So then a umpire is not aloud a bad day?
Yes,
But if i had a bad day every week, i would be dropped. As should the umpires.
Ok, i am off to have alook at your stats. They want to be good.
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:43 am
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:53 am
Gunnerson wrote:Just looked them up and do you really think you should be bagging umpires and saying they should be dropped? 115 runs @ 14 and 55 overs 9 for 150, you also mentioned to have alook at last years stats, to me it sounds like you are back peddling? Are you picked on reputation? The same way umpires are picked? Fair is fair mate.
by Merki the God » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:03 pm
Lucky For Some wrote: Go back through your posts and have a read of the dribble you force us to wade through.
Without knowing who you are but knowing who OKC is I would pretty confidently say OKC has more talent in the end of his **** than your good self.
It is fine having an opinion big fella but when all you are after is an argument then it's time to have a look at yourself.
OKCs stats from last year by the way 576 @ 36 and 14 wickets @ 29.
Price check on buckets
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:09 pm
OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Just looked them up and do you really think you should be bagging umpires and saying they should be dropped? 115 runs @ 14 and 55 overs 9 for 150, you also mentioned to have alook at last years stats, to me it sounds like you are back peddling? Are you picked on reputation? The same way umpires are picked? Fair is fair mate.
haha, no the reason I told you to look at last years stats, is cause apparently according to you, im playing in a lesser league here.. If you think that Brahma willl get smashed by an A3 side.. then making 506 (A2) in all comps last year wouldn't be a bad effort??
Still yet to see your stats mate. All those premierships you watched your mates win must have been good, you would have been batting at 8 or 9 and not bowling?
by Lucky For Some » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:11 pm
Gunnerson wrote:OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:Just looked them up and do you really think you should be bagging umpires and saying they should be dropped? 115 runs @ 14 and 55 overs 9 for 150, you also mentioned to have alook at last years stats, to me it sounds like you are back peddling? Are you picked on reputation? The same way umpires are picked? Fair is fair mate.
haha, no the reason I told you to look at last years stats, is cause apparently according to you, im playing in a lesser league here.. If you think that Brahma willl get smashed by an A3 side.. then making 506 (A2) in all comps last year wouldn't be a bad effort??
Still yet to see your stats mate. All those premierships you watched your mates win must have been good, you would have been batting at 8 or 9 and not bowling?
You told me to look at last years stats because they are better than this years stats,correct? My point being is that umpires have bad days and are the first to be jumped on, so dont come on here raving on about signatures to drop umpires when you are lucky to be playing A grade yourself, for the record i made 115 once as well but it was in one game not 6.
by SmithyOTH » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:17 pm
Gunnerson wrote:Come on Smithy! That line has been used before, cant you come up with your own? Again, is this forum only for friends? That could be your next TV show, How i met my team mates.
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:18 pm
Gunnerson wrote:
You told me to look at last years stats because they are better than this years stats,correct? My point being is that umpires have bad days and are the first to be jumped on, so dont come on here raving on about signatures to drop umpires when you are lucky to be playing A grade yourself, for the record i made 115 once as well but it was in one game not 6.
by Lucky For Some » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:20 pm
Merki the God wrote:Lucky For Some wrote: Go back through your posts and have a read of the dribble you force us to wade through.
Without knowing who you are but knowing who OKC is I would pretty confidently say OKC has more talent in the end of his **** than your good self.
It is fine having an opinion big fella but when all you are after is an argument then it's time to have a look at yourself.
OKCs stats from last year by the way 576 @ 36 and 14 wickets @ 29.
Price check on buckets
The club he played for last year could certainly do with those stats this year!!
by SmithyOTH » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:21 pm
OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:
You told me to look at last years stats because they are better than this years stats,correct? My point being is that umpires have bad days and are the first to be jumped on, so dont come on here raving on about signatures to drop umpires when you are lucky to be playing A grade yourself, for the record i made 115 once as well but it was in one game not 6.
And my point are the umpires are rubbish, and im not Lucky to be playing A grade, once again thats a poorly guided opinion that you have.
I might do another poll right now actually.
EVERYONE PLEASE TAKE NOTE. REPLY TO THIS POST AND LET ME KNOW IF YOU THINK THAT GUNNERSON IS A LOSER
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:22 pm
Lucky For Some wrote:Merki the God wrote:Lucky For Some wrote: Go back through your posts and have a read of the dribble you force us to wade through.
Without knowing who you are but knowing who OKC is I would pretty confidently say OKC has more talent in the end of his **** than your good self.
It is fine having an opinion big fella but when all you are after is an argument then it's time to have a look at yourself.
OKCs stats from last year by the way 576 @ 36 and 14 wickets @ 29.
Price check on buckets
The club he played for last year could certainly do with those stats this year!!
Where did this post disappear to?
by Gunnerson » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:27 pm
OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:
You told me to look at last years stats because they are better than this years stats,correct? My point being is that umpires have bad days and are the first to be jumped on, so dont come on here raving on about signatures to drop umpires when you are lucky to be playing A grade yourself, for the record i made 115 once as well but it was in one game not 6.
And my point are the umpires are rubbish, and im not Lucky to be playing A grade, once again thats a poorly guided opinion that you have.
I might do another poll right now actually.
EVERYONE PLEASE TAKE NOTE. REPLY TO THIS POST AND LET ME KNOW IF YOU THINK THAT GUNNERSON IS A LOSER
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:27 pm
Gunnerson wrote:OKC! wrote:Gunnerson wrote:
You told me to look at last years stats because they are better than this years stats,correct? My point being is that umpires have bad days and are the first to be jumped on, so dont come on here raving on about signatures to drop umpires when you are lucky to be playing A grade yourself, for the record i made 115 once as well but it was in one game not 6.
And my point are the umpires are rubbish, and im not Lucky to be playing A grade, once again thats a poorly guided opinion that you have.
I might do another poll right now actually.
EVERYONE PLEASE TAKE NOTE. REPLY TO THIS POST AND LET ME KNOW IF YOU THINK THAT GUNNERSON IS A LOSER
Stats dont lie mate
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:29 pm
by SmithyOTH » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:36 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Come on fella's if it isn't directly related to the PDCA, do not post it. Gunnerson, I know who you are and so do the other mods, stop trolling or you'll be removed permanently, you started off intelligently and have gone downhill since, if you have nothing constructive to post, don't post it.
by bothamsfearnley » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:39 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Come on fella's if it isn't directly related to the PDCA, do not post it. Gunnerson, I know who you are and so do the other mods, stop trolling or you'll be removed permanently, you started off intelligently and have gone downhill since, if you have nothing constructive to post, don't post it.
by OKC! » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:39 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Come on fella's if it isn't directly related to the PDCA, do not post it. Gunnerson, I know who you are and so do the other mods, stop trolling or you'll be removed permanently, you started off intelligently and have gone downhill since, if you have nothing constructive to post, don't post it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |