by fish » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:49 pm
by Vic Spy » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:43 pm
by purch » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:02 pm
zipzap wrote:Has anyone here been able to gauge the reactions from clubs in interstate leagues?
by SDK » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:50 pm
by Vic Spy » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:17 pm
SDK wrote:Tend to agree with your earlier comments Vic Spy ...we are not that dominant and we are no certainty to beat any VFL or WAFL teams.
The rest of your comments ? Get xxxxed !
We are not here as a League to bow down and accept crap from the AFL. Those arseholes are showing total disrespect to our League and the rest of the state Leagues with what they are proposing money wise.
Maybe in Victoria the VFL means nothing but here in SA the SANFL is thriving and is growing yearly in support for those who like good hard tough football as opposed to basketball like television dominated football.
by Royal City » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:22 pm
Vic Spy wrote:After what Centrals have done to the SANFL you would think the other clubs would jump at the opportunity to get their hands on any kind of silverware !
You think your teams are so dominant and would flog every other side in this comp yet you all go running 100 mile an hour in the opposite direction !
Week as piss SANFL clubs, you must know that North Ballarat and Williamstown would cut you to bits.
Go and hide in your corner with your little 9 team league.
Sit back and watch the AFL money dry up going into the SANFL.
Mr AFL wont put up with little brother telling them what they will and wont do !
by heater31 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:27 pm
Vic Spy wrote:SDK wrote:Tend to agree with your earlier comments Vic Spy ...we are not that dominant and we are no certainty to beat any VFL or WAFL teams.
The rest of your comments ? Get xxxxed !
We are not here as a League to bow down and accept crap from the AFL. Those arseholes are showing total disrespect to our League and the rest of the state Leagues with what they are proposing money wise.
Maybe in Victoria the VFL means nothing but here in SA the SANFL is thriving and is growing yearly in support for those who like good hard tough football as opposed to basketball like television dominated football.
You have a club, and a great club in Centrals win 9 out of the last ten flags and you seriously think your comp is heading in the right direction ?
Get real mate.
by DOC » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:16 pm
heater31 wrote:Vic Spy wrote:SDK wrote:Tend to agree with your earlier comments Vic Spy ...we are not that dominant and we are no certainty to beat any VFL or WAFL teams.
The rest of your comments ? Get xxxxed !
We are not here as a League to bow down and accept crap from the AFL. Those arseholes are showing total disrespect to our League and the rest of the state Leagues with what they are proposing money wise.
Maybe in Victoria the VFL means nothing but here in SA the SANFL is thriving and is growing yearly in support for those who like good hard tough football as opposed to basketball like television dominated football.
You have a club, and a great club in Centrals win 9 out of the last ten flags and you seriously think your comp is heading in the right direction ?
Get real mate.
Yes. Attendances have been rising for several years now and I'm sure most VFA(L) clubs would love to have our average attendances for games. The brand of Football is much different to the V(A)FL tripe forced upon us by the Media.
Other things are also moving forward. I heard a whisper this week that a SANFL club is about to approach an other club with a proposal to play Good Friday night football in future. Much like the Collingwood/Essendon ANZAC Day monopoly......
by CUTTERMAN » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:57 am
Constance_Perm wrote:Brucetiki wrote:Interesting quote from Norwood in regards to why they won't enter the comp:``We've signed a lucrative contract with our major sponsor and we'll stand by him before getting a new jumper for this competition.''
Sounds like the AFL want the participating clubs to wear new guernsey designs for the comp too. This comp sounds increasingly dodgy by the day.
Or possibly current designs minus current sponsor logos? I thought that comment from Dom was interesting too .. Matt Benson's was perhaps the most succinct for mine.
by DOC » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:00 am
by Big Phil » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:59 am
by fester69 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:04 am
by Big Phil » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:24 am
fester69 wrote:Can someone please fill me in on the AFL controlling what strip we wear? I can't find that part. Thanks.
The Localfootysa article wrote:
Norwood
``Nothing has changed for us. We believe it's under-funded. We've lost 12 players and gained a couple of games (with the Champions League), we can't possibly compete.
``We've signed a lucrative contract with our major sponsor and we'll stand by him before getting a new jumper for this competition.''
- Dominic Shepley, chief executive
by Sojourner » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:27 am
DOC wrote:Who have South approached?
by fester69 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:32 am
Big Phil wrote:fester69 wrote:Can someone please fill me in on the AFL controlling what strip we wear? I can't find that part. Thanks.
I don't think it has been written in any of the articles, I think Brucetiki picked up on the comments of your CEO and put 2 and 2 together...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 5969148764The Localfootysa article wrote:
Norwood
``Nothing has changed for us. We believe it's under-funded. We've lost 12 players and gained a couple of games (with the Champions League), we can't possibly compete.
``We've signed a lucrative contract with our major sponsor and we'll stand by him before getting a new jumper for this competition.''
- Dominic Shepley, chief executive
by Big Phil » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:35 am
fester69 wrote:Big Phil wrote:fester69 wrote:Can someone please fill me in on the AFL controlling what strip we wear? I can't find that part. Thanks.
I don't think it has been written in any of the articles, I think Brucetiki picked up on the comments of your CEO and put 2 and 2 together...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 5969148764The Localfootysa article wrote:
Norwood
``Nothing has changed for us. We believe it's under-funded. We've lost 12 players and gained a couple of games (with the Champions League), we can't possibly compete.
``We've signed a lucrative contract with our major sponsor and we'll stand by him before getting a new jumper for this competition.''
- Dominic Shepley, chief executive
Thanks mate, I read that article but didn't put 2 and 2 together (probably would of got 5)!
by Barto » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:14 am
purch wrote:zipzap wrote:Has anyone here been able to gauge the reactions from clubs in interstate leagues?
I've been wondering the same thing. Are they all in? If so, why is the prizemoney, timing of games etc. ok for them and not for us?
Barto, what's the reaction been like over in the WAFL?
by nickname » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:49 pm
Sojourner wrote:DOC wrote:Who have South approached?
Whilst you are often very much on the button with your rumours Doc, I think this time around you may find that it is West Adelaide that are pushing for it!
by The Apostle » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:36 pm
by bloods08 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:55 pm
nickname wrote:Sojourner wrote:DOC wrote:Who have South approached?
Whilst you are often very much on the button with your rumours Doc, I think this time around you may find that it is West Adelaide that are pushing for it!
Well if we're pushing to play Good Friday night football, I hope we're also pushing to play good Saturday afternoon football.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |