by Big Phil » Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:30 pm
by lachlan » Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:05 pm
by Big Phil » Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:11 pm
lachlan wrote:Big Phil
Who were the SANFL Clubs courting Sewell was Centrals one of them.
Who are Centrals close to signing besides Obst & O' Brien. A key forward or a Ruckman maybe
by CoverKing » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:04 am
by bloods08 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:58 am
CoverKing wrote:I am quietly confident that if Myles Sewell decides to play SANFL footy, it will be at the Bloods. I'm not positive it will be with us but I think we are a very very good chance
by JK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:03 am
bloods08 wrote:CoverKing wrote:I am quietly confident that if Myles Sewell decides to play SANFL footy, it will be at the Bloods. I'm not positive it will be with us but I think we are a very very good chance
So in other words he's off to Norwood.
by bloods08 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:31 am
Constance_Perm wrote:bloods08 wrote:CoverKing wrote:I am quietly confident that if Myles Sewell decides to play SANFL footy, it will be at the Bloods. I'm not positive it will be with us but I think we are a very very good chance
So in other words he's off to Norwood.
Lol geez u blokes get the sooks up over losing one 30+ year old, no concerns at not being able to lure Tiller back home then I guess?
by westcoastpanther » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:51 am
bloods08 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:bloods08 wrote:CoverKing wrote:I am quietly confident that if Myles Sewell decides to play SANFL footy, it will be at the Bloods. I'm not positive it will be with us but I think we are a very very good chance
So in other words he's off to Norwood.
Lol geez u blokes get the sooks up over losing one 30+ year old, no concerns at not being able to lure Tiller back home then I guess?
No sooking here. If Eagleton didn't want to play for us than sobeit. Would rather get a 22 year old than a 32 year old.
Am concerned about not getting Tiller but not going to sook about it.
by CENTURION » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:05 am
by DOC » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:00 pm
CENTURION wrote:bummer! Mitch Frail off to play for Eastlakes in Canberra.
by CoverKing » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:24 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:bloods08 wrote:CoverKing wrote:I am quietly confident that if Myles Sewell decides to play SANFL footy, it will be at the Bloods. I'm not positive it will be with us but I think we are a very very good chance
So in other words he's off to Norwood.
Lol geez u blokes get the sooks up over losing one 30+ year old, no concerns at not being able to lure Tiller back home then I guess?
by Big Phil » Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:36 pm
DOC wrote:CENTURION wrote:bummer! Mitch Frail off to play for Eastlakes in Canberra.
How many games did Frail Mitch play?
by JK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:17 pm
CoverKing wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:bloods08 wrote:CoverKing wrote:I am quietly confident that if Myles Sewell decides to play SANFL footy, it will be at the Bloods. I'm not positive it will be with us but I think we are a very very good chance
So in other words he's off to Norwood.
Lol geez u blokes get the sooks up over losing one 30+ year old, no concerns at not being able to lure Tiller back home then I guess?
I thought it was a bit of a sook aswell but anywho play on ...
by CK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:22 pm
by Go Legs » Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:19 pm
by Sojourner » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:36 pm
CK wrote:I know this will raise the ire of some fans, but so be it.
I'm not sure there should be a moral obligation for a player to automatically return to his original club when he returns from interstate. Recognising entirely the philosophy - often correct - that, without the assistance, time and development of his original club, he may not have had an AFL/interstate career - there is also the right of a player to negotiate the best deal for himself, post AFL/interstate.
If his original club is not offering him a deal that is as good financially as that of another club, then how far does the "moral obligation" stretch, if football is his primary source of income for him and his family? Does he have a duty to himself and his family to make the best deal for himself also?
This is not directed at any club, player or person in particular, but just an observation from the last few seasons.
by nickname » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:05 pm
CK wrote:I know this will raise the ire of some fans, but so be it.
I'm not sure there should be a moral obligation for a player to automatically return to his original club when he returns from interstate. Recognising entirely the philosophy - often correct - that, without the assistance, time and development of his original club, he may not have had an AFL/interstate career - there is also the right of a player to negotiate the best deal for himself, post AFL/interstate.
If his original club is not offering him a deal that is as good financially as that of another club, then how far does the "moral obligation" stretch, if football is his primary source of income for him and his family? Does he have a duty to himself and his family to make the best deal for himself also?
This is not directed at any club, player or person in particular, but just an observation from the last few seasons.
by sjt » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:12 pm
by Aerie » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:15 pm
sjt wrote:I can't recall the last player that came out and said, "I chose a club for the money". Not even T.G.
by sjt » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:20 pm
Aerie wrote:sjt wrote:I can't recall the last player that came out and said, "I chose a club for the money". Not even T.G.
Nathan Bock?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |