by MrTeach » Fri Nov 26, 2010 3:18 pm
Pommy Git wrote:the big bang wrote:
the word i've got out of McLaren's is a mass exodus of players, largely due to a dis-like for Steve Hill?
got no names, but i've heard as many as 8 A Graders looking at moving on.
Players resisting change = unsuccessful club. If these soft individuals don't want to change and the Club wants to be successful then move them on. The Reynella boys under a similarly tough and successful coach have accepted change, have put in the hard work and have been rewarded.
by qwerty » Fri Nov 26, 2010 3:39 pm
MrTeach wrote:Pommy Git wrote:the big bang wrote:
the word i've got out of McLaren's is a mass exodus of players, largely due to a dis-like for Steve Hill?
got no names, but i've heard as many as 8 A Graders looking at moving on.
Players resisting change = unsuccessful club. If these soft individuals don't want to change and the Club wants to be successful then move them on. The Reynella boys under a similarly tough and successful coach have accepted change, have put in the hard work and have been rewarded.
Pommy i would not be passing all the blame on the players. There is absolutely no game plan at all and to lose Schneidfer and Jackman their two best midfielders will not make things any easier. A Great club with soem quality people BUT the culture of the whole place needs to change. Dont just blame players, the Coach has gotta take some responsibility.
by Micky Conlan » Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:31 pm
by New Era » Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:48 pm
Darryl, Words of Wisdom and Luvs Footy - what have you got in support of your claims of the GSFL claiming dispensation from this.Darryl Poole wrote:Old Dog sounds like your barking up the wrong tree maybe you should get back in your kennel!
by LuvsFooty » Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:37 pm
by Dr Tellall » Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:00 am
by words of wisdom » Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:10 am
Dr Tellall wrote:Can anyone tell me is Sarge is coaching pongy 17s again
by Hardly_super » Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:41 am
qwerty wrote:MrTeach wrote:Pommy Git wrote:the big bang wrote:
the word i've got out of McLaren's is a mass exodus of players, largely due to a dis-like for Steve Hill?
got no names, but i've heard as many as 8 A Graders looking at moving on.
Players resisting change = unsuccessful club. If these soft individuals don't want to change and the Club wants to be successful then move them on. The Reynella boys under a similarly tough and successful coach have accepted change, have put in the hard work and have been rewarded.
Pommy i would not be passing all the blame on the players. There is absolutely no game plan at all and to lose Schneidfer and Jackman their two best midfielders will not make things any easier. A Great club with soem quality people BUT the culture of the whole place needs to change. Dont just blame players, the Coach has gotta take some responsibility.
Makes you think they should have appointed Troy Jacques when he applied at the same time Steve Hill did - would definately have changed the culture and been able to pull some good quality footballers with him. Looks like the pannel may habv made the wrong decision.
by vics01 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:02 pm
qwerty wrote:
MrTeach wrote:
Pommy Git wrote:
the big bang wrote:
the word i've got out of McLaren's is a mass exodus of players, largely due to a dis-like for Steve Hill?
got no names, but i've heard as many as 8 A Graders looking at moving on.
Players resisting change = unsuccessful club. If these soft individuals don't want to change and the Club wants to be successful then move them on. The Reynella boys under a similarly tough and successful coach have accepted change, have put in the hard work and have been rewarded.
Pommy i would not be passing all the blame on the players. There is absolutely no game plan at all and to lose Schneidfer and Jackman their two best midfielders will not make things any easier. A Great club with soem quality people BUT the culture of the whole place needs to change. Dont just blame players, the Coach has gotta take some responsibility.
Makes you think they should have appointed Troy Jacques when he applied at the same time Steve Hill did - would definately have changed the culture and been able to pull some good quality footballers with him. Looks like the pannel may habv made the wrong decision.
by Tiger83 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:24 pm
by words of wisdom » Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:38 am
by White Line Fever » Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:21 am
words of wisdom wrote:Also i heard that the CBF could not account for $140 000 they spent this year! Is this correct??
by Luke15 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:01 am
vics01 wrote:qwerty wrote:
MrTeach wrote:
Pommy Git wrote:
the big bang wrote:
the word i've got out of McLaren's is a mass exodus of players, largely due to a dis-like for Steve Hill?
got no names, but i've heard as many as 8 A Graders looking at moving on.
Players resisting change = unsuccessful club. If these soft individuals don't want to change and the Club wants to be successful then move them on. The Reynella boys under a similarly tough and successful coach have accepted change, have put in the hard work and have been rewarded.
Pommy i would not be passing all the blame on the players. There is absolutely no game plan at all and to lose Schneidfer and Jackman their two best midfielders will not make things any easier. A Great club with soem quality people BUT the culture of the whole place needs to change. Dont just blame players, the Coach has gotta take some responsibility.
Makes you think they should have appointed Troy Jacques when he applied at the same time Steve Hill did - would definately have changed the culture and been able to pull some good quality footballers with him. Looks like the pannel may habv made the wrong decision.
I understand from a very reliable source at McLaren that:
"It appears a disgruntled ex-member of the McLaren F.C. who is currently coaching a reserves S.F.L. team is still undermining McLaren. Appears to be a family trait. I suggest that anyone who has questions involving the McLaren F.C. contact their president as that is why he is there, to represent the Club. To the ex-member, the Club has and will always survive without you, I suggest that you don't burn anymore bridges".
by RFC 2010 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:33 am
vics01 wrote:qwerty wrote:
MrTeach wrote:
Pommy Git wrote:
the big bang wrote:
the word i've got out of McLaren's is a mass exodus of players, largely due to a dis-like for Steve Hill?
got no names, but i've heard as many as 8 A Graders looking at moving on.
Players resisting change = unsuccessful club. If these soft individuals don't want to change and the Club wants to be successful then move them on. The Reynella boys under a similarly tough and successful coach have accepted change, have put in the hard work and have been rewarded.
Pommy i would not be passing all the blame on the players. There is absolutely no game plan at all and to lose Schneidfer and Jackman their two best midfielders will not make things any easier. A Great club with soem quality people BUT the culture of the whole place needs to change. Dont just blame players, the Coach has gotta take some responsibility.
Makes you think they should have appointed Troy Jacques when he applied at the same time Steve Hill did - would definately have changed the culture and been able to pull some good quality footballers with him. Looks like the pannel may habv made the wrong decision.
I understand from a very reliable source at McLaren that:
"It appears a disgruntled ex-member of the McLaren F.C. who is currently coaching a reserves S.F.L. team is still undermining McLaren. Appears to be a family trait. I suggest that anyone who has questions involving the McLaren F.C. contact their president as that is why he is there, to represent the Club. To the ex-member, the Club has and will always survive without you, I suggest that you don't burn anymore bridges".
by turbo182 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:35 pm
by footballfollower » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:51 pm
by BFG » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:54 pm
footballfollower wrote:Who are the 4
are they A grade players from SAAFL
If they have played majority in B Grade then they are not 3 points
also all clubs in GSGL have 17 points to play with not 15
by LuvsFooty » Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:59 pm
by field of dreams » Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:21 pm
footballfollower wrote:Who are the 4
are they A grade players from SAAFL
If they have played majority in B Grade then they are not 3 points
also all clubs in GSGL have 17 points to play with not 15
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |