mickey wrote:helicopterking wrote:Explain why Glenelg would Top dress there oval on a Thursday Arvo!? Talk about boring cricket!!
With a nickname like the seahorses, would u really expect some common sense?
Touche!
by helicopterking » Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:31 am
mickey wrote:helicopterking wrote:Explain why Glenelg would Top dress there oval on a Thursday Arvo!? Talk about boring cricket!!
With a nickname like the seahorses, would u really expect some common sense?
by Shark_Hunter » Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:56 pm
by heater31 » Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:59 pm
Shark_Hunter wrote:Adelaide vs WT played just over 40 overs today. WT are 5/115. B grade off - C and D grade called off after about 8 overs. Any other games get away? Seems the side batting first gets the raw end of the deal...
by Iron Fist » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:38 am
by Bulls forever » Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:32 pm
Iron Fist wrote:Ports A grade got away, they were 3/15 early
but luderman and weeks slogged away.
Rained stopped them for probs 2-3 hours in between lunch and tea.
then got back out there, weeks brought up a 50 then got out.
Luderman went on to make 100 from what I heard.
I left the game about 4:30.
Very good effort considering the weather, the pitch looked nice and green aswell.
by Iron Fist » Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:36 am
Bulls forever wrote:Iron Fist wrote:Ports A grade got away, they were 3/15 early
but luderman and weeks slogged away.
Rained stopped them for probs 2-3 hours in between lunch and tea.
then got back out there, weeks brought up a 50 then got out.
Luderman went on to make 100 from what I heard.
I left the game about 4:30.
Very good effort considering the weather, the pitch looked nice and green aswell.
Yeah, Port Reserve always looks like that, not sure whether Weeks is still doing it, but there wickets have been excellent last few years, good batting decks if you can get through the first few overs, does seem a bit, but very deceiving to look at.
by The Angry Bull » Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:06 am
Iron Fist wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Iron Fist wrote:Ports A grade got away, they were 3/15 early
but luderman and weeks slogged away.
Rained stopped them for probs 2-3 hours in between lunch and tea.
then got back out there, weeks brought up a 50 then got out.
Luderman went on to make 100 from what I heard.
I left the game about 4:30.
Very good effort considering the weather, the pitch looked nice and green aswell.
Yeah, Port Reserve always looks like that, not sure whether Weeks is still doing it, but there wickets have been excellent last few years, good batting decks if you can get through the first few overs, does seem a bit, but very deceiving to look at.
Ports is always very green before christmas, but you are right they are great batting decks. Also if the bowlers work hard they get rewarded aswell.
As far as Im aware Weeksy still does the pitches. Could have moved on? Wouldnt think so though!
by mickey » Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:56 pm
Iron Fist wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Iron Fist wrote:Ports A grade got away, they were 3/15 early
but luderman and weeks slogged away.
Rained stopped them for probs 2-3 hours in between lunch and tea.
then got back out there, weeks brought up a 50 then got out.
Luderman went on to make 100 from what I heard.
I left the game about 4:30.
Very good effort considering the weather, the pitch looked nice and green aswell.
Yeah, Port Reserve always looks like that, not sure whether Weeks is still doing it, but there wickets have been excellent last few years, good batting decks if you can get through the first few overs, does seem a bit, but very deceiving to look at.
Ports is always very green before christmas, but you are right they are great batting decks. Also if the bowlers work hard they get rewarded aswell.
As far as Im aware Weeksy still does the pitches. Could have moved on? Wouldnt think so though!
by oldeagle » Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:55 pm
by oldblueeyes » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:22 pm
oldeagle wrote:Awesome effort by the State Under 19s today at Park 25. Chased down Northern's 245 with 4.3 overs to spare.
Garrett 95 no and Barrett 96 no were outstanding in a controlled partnership.
You don't want to be a bowler at Park 25.
East Torrens won the Ray Sutton final and I think The Jet B's accounted for SA Under 17s fairly easily.
by Bulls forever » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:26 pm
oldeagle wrote:Awesome effort by the State Under 19s today at Park 25. Chased down Northern's 245 with 4.3 overs to spare.
Garrett 95 no and Barrett 96 no were outstanding in a controlled partnership.
You don't want to be a bowler at Park 25.
East Torrens won the Ray Sutton final and I think The Jet B's accounted for SA Under 17s fairly easily.
by oldeagle » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:42 pm
by Bag The Points » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:00 pm
oldeagle wrote:Awesome effort by the State Under 19s today at Park 25. Chased down Northern's 245 with 4.3 overs to spare.
Garrett 95 no and Barrett 96 no were outstanding in a controlled partnership.
You don't want to be a bowler at Park 25.
East Torrens won the Ray Sutton final and I think The Jet B's accounted for SA Under 17s fairly easily.
by the star » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:39 pm
oldeagle wrote:Agree. Would have thought the C's would have been a better fit for the 17's.
Jet's B's always a fairly battle hardened side. Big ask for the youngsters to take them on.
by RedMagpie » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:43 pm
the star wrote:oldeagle wrote:Agree. Would have thought the C's would have been a better fit for the 17's.
Jet's B's always a fairly battle hardened side. Big ask for the youngsters to take them on.
Jets b grade had 3 d graders from previous day in the side 2 of which are still eligible for under 16s and between those two they took 6 wickets and the other d grader mentioned took 2 and he was an under 16 last season. An obvious gap between 17s and 19s mainly a maturity and growth thing I would imagine. the 19s played well today and both lads from southern showed plenty with the bat. Great news also for the 2 northern lads who have made the final squad! Both not been in saca squads before. Well done cam and alex and the others
by oldeagle » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:53 pm
by Footy Smart » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:22 am
by Bulls forever » Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:56 am
Footy Smart wrote:Great work by Quinny and the East Torrens lads on Saturday.... leaving the covers on until 10.30ish! to bad you still didnt get the result![]()
Good effort by TTG to chase down the 220 only 3 down. Hopefully can put up a good shwoing against another undefeated side in Sturt this week.
Can anyone confirm that Tait is playing? have heard he is
by Footy Smart » Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:14 am
Bulls forever wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Great work by Quinny and the East Torrens lads on Saturday.... leaving the covers on until 10.30ish! to bad you still didnt get the result![]()
Good effort by TTG to chase down the 220 only 3 down. Hopefully can put up a good shwoing against another undefeated side in Sturt this week.
Can anyone confirm that Tait is playing? have heard he is
Another busy day at work FS, I got told he was supposed to play last night but obviously didn't. Get the word out quick, might be a few hammy problems at Bull Park this week if confirmed.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |