Australia v England @ SCG

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Postby SOTTERS » Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:48 am

Its a bit hard not too be nervous when you get called into the side for a one off innings, make runs and he is on the plane to the West Indies, fail and his career hangs on a knifes edge. He should of been given four or fives game on the trot, and then we could of seen a true indication fo him as a international one day cricketer.
User avatar
SOTTERS
Rookie
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:59 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:50 am

Hodge also has a glaring weakness against the shorter ball.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby am Bays » Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:55 am

SOTTERS wrote:Its a bit hard not too be nervous when you get called into the side for a one off innings, make runs and he is on the plane to the West Indies, fail and his career hangs on a knifes edge. He should of been given four or fives game on the trot, and then we could of seen a true indication fo him as a international one day cricketer.


True SOTTERS, but good international players have the ability to put their thoughts to one side and just concentrate on the ball, a la M Clarke 4 years ago when he came into the side due to Boof getting banned and he scored 49 (I think) on debut....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19616
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2086 times

Postby SOTTERS » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:01 pm

And Andrew Symonds who played for five years without making a run. He only got picked for the last World Cup becuase of Ponting insisted he goes. His batting average for the triangular series before the 2003 world cup was 8. Some plyers like Symonds need to be given a extended run.
User avatar
SOTTERS
Rookie
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:59 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby am Bays » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:07 pm

True but first game in Symonds made 86* on debut in 1999.....

IIRC Hodge got a run of games in either 2004-05 or 2005-06 but didn't produce......

With Ponting fit who would he replace given that I expect Watson to play as an opener in the Hadlee Chappell trophy prior to the World Cup....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19616
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2086 times

Postby SOTTERS » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:14 pm

Hodge made a 50 in his second match against New Zealand last year, when he knew that he was in the side for the three games. Watson as a opener what a joke, why dont the selectors start picking the best sides intead of Pontings mates. Watson at 6 or 7 but not opening, he dosn't open for QLD.
User avatar
SOTTERS
Rookie
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:59 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby mal » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:47 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:Hodge also has a glaring weakness against the shorter ball.


Something COSGROVE failed to expliot last week.
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29775
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2004 times
Been liked: 1988 times

Postby SOTTERS » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:53 pm

mal wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Hodge also has a glaring weakness against the shorter ball.


Something COSGROVE failed to expliot last week.


Plays the hook and pull pretty well Mal. Don't get sucked into all the media hype bout Hodge and the short ball, becuase he once got out in a test match to a short ball on the stoke of stumps. Im pretty sure Tait would of tested him last week with plenty.
User avatar
SOTTERS
Rookie
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:59 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby mal » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:03 pm

SOTTERS wrote:
mal wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Hodge also has a glaring weakness against the shorter ball.


Something COSGROVE failed to expliot last week.


Plays the hook and pull pretty well Mal. Don't get sucked into all the media hype bout Hodge and the short ball, becuase he once got out in a test match to a short ball on the stoke of stumps. Im pretty sure Tait would of tested him last week with plenty.


My dig was at COSGROVE. :rolleyes:

As for HODGE I havent noticed a percieved weakness that AH has expressed.
But I will stay out of that one and let you 2 sort it out.

IF he has a glaring weakness I suggest he wears sunglasses.
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29775
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2004 times
Been liked: 1988 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:11 pm

mal wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Hodge also has a glaring weakness against the shorter ball.


Something COSGROVE failed to expliot last week.


Cosegrove's shorter ball isn't going to worry anyone. I'm talking about good short of the length bowling, in line with the body. That is the place to bowl to Hodge consistantly if you want to get him out. I was getting very annoyed with the half volleys we kept serving up to Hodge, and kept telling my maye exactly where we need to bowl.

Suddenly, Harris bowls one that takes off short of the length, in line with the body, head high ... Hodge didn't have a clue how to handle it. What did we do after that? Go back to bowling half volleys. I have no idea what the Redbacks bowlers were thinking the other night. If Hodge had to face the West Indies attack of the 80s, he would never reach double figures.

Cosgrove cannot bowl because he simply in unable to bowl a consistant line and/or length. He bowls rubbish. Keep dealing up rubbish to Hodge like we did Wednesday night and he will make 100s.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Booney » Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:14 pm

Booney wrote:$7 for a roughie in a two horse race,good enough odds for FIGmal to take? Methinks not...




m :oops: a :oops: l :oops:
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60938
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8045 times
Been liked: 11720 times

Postby mal » Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:40 pm

Booney wrote:
Booney wrote:$7 for a roughie in a two horse race,good enough odds for FIGmal to take? Methinks not...




m :oops: a :oops: l :oops:


B :oops: :oops: NEY

Did you get on :?:
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29775
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2004 times
Been liked: 1988 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:14 am

mal wrote:
Booney wrote:
Booney wrote:$7 for a roughie in a two horse race,good enough odds for FIGmal to take? Methinks not...




m :oops: a :oops: l :oops:


B :oops: :oops: NEY

Did you get on :?:


im betting BOONEY didnt get on :oops: :oops:
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60398
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13221 times
Been liked: 4514 times

Postby mal » Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:42 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Hodge also has a glaring weakness against the shorter ball.


Something COSGROVE failed to expliot last week.


Cosegrove's shorter ball isn't going to worry anyone. I'm talking about good short of the length bowling, in line with the body. That is the place to bowl to Hodge consistantly if you want to get him out. I was getting very annoyed with the half volleys we kept serving up to Hodge, and kept telling my maye exactly where we need to bowl.

Suddenly, Harris bowls one that takes off short of the length, in line with the body, head high ... Hodge didn't have a clue how to handle it. What did we do after that? Go back to bowling half volleys. I have no idea what the Redbacks bowlers were thinking the other night. If Hodge had to face the West Indies attack of the 80s, he would never reach double figures.

Cosgrove cannot bowl because he simply in unable to bowl a consistant line and/or length. He bowls rubbish. Keep dealing up rubbish to Hodge like we did Wednesday night and he will make 100s.


AH au v nz
I noticed as soon as HODGE came in they took off the quicks and
brought on STYRIS with VETTORI and bowled half volleys to him
99*
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29775
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2004 times
Been liked: 1988 times

Postby Booney » Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:01 am

mal wrote:
Booney wrote:
Booney wrote:$7 for a roughie in a two horse race,good enough odds for FIGmal to take? Methinks not...




m :oops: a :oops: l :oops:


B :oops: :oops: NEY

Did you get on :?:


@ $4.20 when they were 1/60 odd..... :lol:
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60938
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8045 times
Been liked: 11720 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:11 am

at least you had something on!!!!!!!!!!!

good work :!:
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60398
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13221 times
Been liked: 4514 times

Postby mal » Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:01 pm

mal wrote:Did we all see Richard Eales report in the pres today
SA V EG o/d fictitous game and whp would win.
Earle is a very very good reporter BUT he said
only Flintoff, Strauss and possibly Bell would make the SA team.[no PANESAR...hmn]
Big statement, he also said SA would win in a romp. :!: :!: :!:

MALS COMBINED X1
-----------------------

ELLIOTT
JOYCE
BELL
LEHMANN
COSGROVE
FLINTOFF
COLLINGWOOD
NIXON
GILLESPIE
TAIT
PANESAR
12th man MARK HUGH JACKMAN CLEARY

I have 6 poms in the team
Had PLONKERSEN,STRESSCOTHIK,VAUGHAN + ANDERSON been fit there
would have been more Poms in my team.

TODAYS GAME AU V EG
---------------------------
Ponting playing, Hodge in ?
Lets hope AU bats first for the food vendors, bar takings .......
My tip I will again stick my head out and select AU to win
Lets hope TAIT tears them apart.
Will LOYE get caught in the keeper slips region for the 5th time in 5 games ?
Can STRAUSS make a 50 vrs AU this season ?
Will AU try and get to 400 runs if batting first.[absurd]
Will AH call 50 over games a joke AGAIN.



I stuck my head out and tipped AU to beat EG :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

I dont feel as bad now
Richard Earle said SA would beat EG in a romp :butthead:
EG beat AU the next 3 games.

:lol:
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 29775
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2004 times
Been liked: 1988 times

Postby rod_rooster » Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote: If Hodge had to face the West Indies attack of the 80s, he would never reach double figures.


I missed this one :lol: Geez he's really on his own there :roll:

Fact is he doesn't have to face the WI's of the 80's. That WI side will not be replicated again anytime soon. The statistics of many players would be different had it not been for that great WI team of the 70's 80's and early 90's.

Bottom line, Hodge is a class act and will make runs at international level if given the chance. Having said that there are better options for Australia. Before mal says it Watson isn't one of them.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:03 am

rod_rooster wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote: If Hodge had to face the West Indies attack of the 80s, he would never reach double figures.


I missed this one :lol: Geez he's really on his own there :roll:

Fact is he doesn't have to face the WI's of the 80's. That WI side will not be replicated again anytime soon. The statistics of many players would be different had it not been for that great WI team of the 70's 80's and early 90's.

Bottom line, Hodge is a class act and will make runs at international level if given the chance. Having said that there are better options for Australia. Before mal says it Watson isn't one of them.


The way people miss the point on this forum is frightening. I actually DO realise Hodge won't be facing the West Indian attack of the 80s. My point was being made in relation to his very poor technique in playing short pitched bowling. Hodge will not make runs against any Test attack who works him out, and therefore his position in the Test team will always be tenuous. The Test selectors know this, and that is why they have been hesitant in selecting him in the Test team. He'll be fine in the one day matches facing all those half volleys.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |