Hutchy Churches wrote:spastic is better than budda
buddha's get prayed to, spastics get prayed for lol
by rockstar » Fri Oct 22, 2010 5:51 pm
Hutchy Churches wrote:spastic is better than budda
by rockstar » Fri Oct 22, 2010 5:57 pm
One Ball Bandit wrote:aarrgghh the nightmares are coming backbut i dont care what anyone says,it was a beauty of a ball!!!!
by Phantom Gossiper » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:03 pm
rockstar wrote:One Ball Bandit wrote:aarrgghh the nightmares are coming backbut i dont care what anyone says,it was a beauty of a ball!!!!
think the Phantom has also despatched you for a few 6s over time too hasnt he?
by Phantom Gossiper » Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:04 pm
rockstar wrote:Hutchy Churches wrote:spastic is better than budda
buddha's get prayed to, spastics get prayed for lol
by rockstar » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:46 am
by One Ball Bandit » Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:50 am
rockstar wrote:One Ball Bandit wrote:aarrgghh the nightmares are coming backbut i dont care what anyone says,it was a beauty of a ball!!!!
think the Phantom has also despatched you for a few 6s over time too hasnt he?
by One Ball Bandit » Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:57 am
Mythbuster wrote:Hutchy Churches wrote:ive heard a big rumer about you phantam do you wanna hear it?
I do, i do!!![]()
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:36 am
One Ball Bandit wrote:If you were a wannabe Hutchy..you would have some sort of revelant news but all you seem to write is crap crap and more crap so can you all do us a favour and go annoy someone elses Association (pretty please) PS.Learn how to spell
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:38 am
One Ball Bandit wrote:A Few???One that i can recall and if i remember correctly soon after that six i dismissed you after you tried to have another go at me,got to greedy.OOhh isn't it a coincedence that i was chatting to the Phantom on Facebook and at the identical time ROCKSTAR posts something on here![]()
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:00 am
by The Real Number 3 » Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:57 pm
by bored » Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:35 pm
The Real Number 3 wrote:Shocking loss to today for the Roo's.
Morialta batted first and made 133 or there abouts. Big Bryce taking a couple wickets and myself (opened the bowling), m frith, clarkson and eddie grabbing singles. We should've had them out for under 100 but i think 7 or 8 dropped catches really hurt us.
We ended up making 100 roughly I think. No major scorers, alot of stupid shots and thinking we had the game in the bag cost us victory. Also, 1 of their bowlers ripped through our middle order taking 5/13.
We were without Barnes and Holland, so it was a very young outfit with Bryce and Eddie the only elder statesmen in the team.
Still, it's only round 2 and im fairly sure teams will still be shaking off the cobwebs so not alot to read into form wise I think.
by Oxygen Thief » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:58 pm
bored wrote:The Real Number 3 wrote:Shocking loss to today for the Roo's.
Morialta batted first and made 133 or there abouts. Big Bryce taking a couple wickets and myself (opened the bowling), m frith, clarkson and eddie grabbing singles. We should've had them out for under 100 but i think 7 or 8 dropped catches really hurt us.
We ended up making 100 roughly I think. No major scorers, alot of stupid shots and thinking we had the game in the bag cost us victory. Also, 1 of their bowlers ripped through our middle order taking 5/13.
We were without Barnes and Holland, so it was a very young outfit with Bryce and Eddie the only elder statesmen in the team.
Still, it's only round 2 and im fairly sure teams will still be shaking off the cobwebs so not alot to read into form wise I think.
who was the bowler??
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:31 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:for typewriter...
good luck today mate, but im backing in Enfield to wipe the floor with you today, looking at their lineup would say its one of the strongest they have had for some time and led by the bloke whose not short of big noting himself Mr M i think they will be a tough side to knock
by auto » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:02 pm
by No1_Source » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:28 pm
by Ecky » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:35 am
No1_Source wrote:Enfield A Grade lost to Seaton As seaton 146 enfield 79?
Enfield C Grade defeated Rose Park B enfield 4/161 rose park 71
AND Enfield B grade DEFEATED Para Vista B's enfield 139 to para vista 76
so i guess that stuff up ur theory ecky :S
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by benjir » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:24 am
by silent hour » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:31 am
benjir wrote:dont have the advertiser, keen anyone tell me the scores for Div 1 and Div 2??
by silent hour » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:34 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |