Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Anything!

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby once_were_warriors » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:03 am

To fix South Road temprarily whilst the 20 year plan is implemented:

Block of every 2 out of 3 side streets entering South Road , (Regency Rd through to Sturt Rd)
Major Intersections - restrict right hand turns during peak hours eg turn right at Richmond Rd , no turn right at Sir Donald.
Remove stand alone pedestrian lights.
Buy 10000l of yellow paint, with no parking on South Rd at all between hours of 6am to 9pm. Monday through Friday
DTEI to actually undertake proper traffic surveys and adjust accordingly traffic signal phases at all major intersections.

Same could be done on Goodwood Rd, Tapleys Rd, Marion Rd, Unley Rd.

Spend Some coin now and actually have conceptual designs in place , such that when funding is available, procurement and construction can commence quickly.
If at first you don't succeed , then destroy all evidence that you tried in the first place
once_were_warriors
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: under Scoreboard Woody Oval
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Ronnie » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:08 am

once_were_warriors wrote:To fix South Road temprarily whilst the 20 year plan is implemented:

Block of every 2 out of 3 side streets entering South Road , (Regency Rd through to Sturt Rd)
Major Intersections - restrict right hand turns during peak hours eg turn right at Richmond Rd , no turn right at Sir Donald.
Remove stand alone pedestrian lights.
Buy 10000l of yellow paint, with no parking on South Rd at all between hours of 6am to 9pm. Monday through Friday
DTEI to actually undertake proper traffic surveys and adjust accordingly traffic signal phases at all major intersections.

Same could be done on Goodwood Rd, Tapleys Rd, Marion Rd, Unley Rd.

Spend Some coin now and actually have conceptual designs in place , such that when funding is available, procurement and construction can commence quickly.


Some good ideas there.
But stand alone pedestrian lights often are there for schools, surely those need to stay.
Ronnie
Reserves
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby White Line Fever » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:08 am

Sojourner wrote:
Dissident wrote:We have tried to make things work in a better and more effective way.

O-Bahn
Southern Expressway
Northern Expressway
Port River Expressway
South Eastern Freeway

Hilton Bridge -> underpass
Gallipoli underpass
Port River bridge

etc etc.

These are positive things, even if some of them weren't done in the best way or with the most thought.

I like the idae of a north/south corridor. It's going to take al ot of money and a lot of time though.
God knows what will happen around South Road, mainly 6 or 7 km from the CBD.


Personally I think that the OBahn busway is the best form of public transport for the local conditions that we have in Adelaide out of all the public transport options, it was very much a visionary idea and it has worked very well - 15mins from Tea Tree Plaza to the City on the Express in Peak Hour is not so bad, will drop further when they can get it through the ring road peak hour traffic faster as funded by the feds.

With South Rd, Pat Conlon was on Leons show on 5AA suggesting that he would like to see the Southern Expressway link up with South Road at the Cross Rd Overpass. Think this would be a huge step forward for the southern side of the city if this were to be able to be done!


Great idea.

They need to just follow the Tonsley train line then Noarlunga line to Cross Road.

Build above it on concrete legs like the majority of Melbourne freeways in inner metro area.

Bulldoze a few homes.
Tough but that's life.
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Dissident » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:13 am

I know most people will disagree with me, but I really like the idea of reducing some roads from two to ONE lane, and creating a permanent park lane, and a permanent turning lane.

It's what they've done on the top of Prospect Road. Yes. it seems silly - but the flow is so much easier (what I've experienced). There aren't people waiting for people turning right, and people going around parked cars.

This could work on Unley Road/King WIlliam Road, Port Rush/Glynburn Roads... etc.

Of course, I couldn't be barking up the wrong tree.
I love 'Food and Stuff'. It's where I buy all of my food. And most of my stuff.
User avatar
Dissident
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 6394
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:55 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Hondo » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:24 am

Ronnie wrote:Some good ideas there.
But stand alone pedestrian lights often are there for schools, surely those need to stay.


I agree. I am happy to wait for children to cross the road to go to school! The one just before Richmond road as you head north is for the primary school. I don''t think we can turn South Road as it is now into a freeway.

I use South Road between Anzac Highway and Port Road and the flow isn't too bad outside of peak hours. If I leave for home at 5pm it takes 30-40 minutes. If I leave at 5.45 it takes 20-25 minutes. There's a risk of blocking too much other access (car and pedestrian) to South Road just to cater for the peak hours. Something needs to be done outside of blocking access IMO. One exception though is the stretch between Torrens Road and Port Road where right hand turns at peak hour on a 4 lane road can cause chaos!

One thing I have thought about is pedestrian bridges across South Road instead of actually crossing the road. The problem would be finding the room on either side of the road as in some stretches the properties come right up to the footpath.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Dissident » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:31 am

I'm not a fan of using city-bound roads in the morning. I try to avoid them.

I live in Modbury Heights and work in Dulwich. I drive straight down Sudultz/Newton/St Bernards/Penfold road, on to Kensington, and left onto Prescott. I hate using North East, or Lower North East in the morning.
I love 'Food and Stuff'. It's where I buy all of my food. And most of my stuff.
User avatar
Dissident
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 6394
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:55 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby fisho mcspaz » Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:57 am

I wish that Port Augusta or Whyalla could be designed as a second metropolis but unfortunately I don't think the government can be bothered. :( The urban sprawl - particularly the coastal region down south - is getting out of hand. Most of this state is desert and here we are chewing up all the best arable land because everyone wants to live near the beach.
Hey Goose, ya big stud! Take me to bed or lose me for ever.
User avatar
fisho mcspaz
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3042
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: Happy Valley
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 111 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Leaping Lindner » Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:44 pm

Having just returned from the old home town my one suggestion would be denser inner city housing. More people, more services more to do. Also improve public transport in these areas to take the pressure of traffic.
You don't have to be packed in like sardines but you can have a smaller home/unit whatever. If you want a backyard or whatvever you've always got the option of the suburbs. I stayed at my mums when I was over there, which is considered inner city, and at night it was like an above ground cemetry. Do people in Adelaide actually go out on weeknights anymore?? :?
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Bully » Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:41 pm

fisho mcspaz wrote:I wish that Port Augusta or Whyalla could be designed as a second metropolis but unfortunately I don't think the government can be bothered. :( The urban sprawl - particularly the coastal region down south - is getting out of hand. Most of this state is desert and here we are chewing up all the best arable land because everyone wants to live near the beach.



maybe for adelaide its getting out of hand.But the govenrment wont do anything about roads and rail. Try living in south east queensland, then you will see some urban sprawl :)
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Barto » Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:15 pm

White Line Fever wrote:
Barto wrote: Adelaide missed the boat


I think you've summed it up perfectly Barto


There's too much building infill in areas that were set aside for transport corridors, it couldn't be done today. At least when Perth did it in the late 50s, early 60s, the city was sparsely populated enough that it was possible to bulldoze things without upsetting many people.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Barto » Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:17 pm

Dissident wrote:I know most people will disagree with me, but I really like the idea of reducing some roads from two to ONE lane, and creating a permanent park lane, and a permanent turning lane.

It's what they've done on the top of Prospect Road. Yes. it seems silly - but the flow is so much easier (what I've experienced). There aren't people waiting for people turning right, and people going around parked cars.

This could work on Unley Road/King WIlliam Road, Port Rush/Glynburn Roads... etc.

Of course, I couldn't be barking up the wrong tree.


I'm a big fan of slip lanes for turning right, but how many people use them effectively with the car jutting out into traffic or not merging right soon enough before hitting the brakes, then indicating?

The only problem with one lane is that if something happens, there's no way around it.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Gingernuts » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:54 pm

Though it was worth bumping this thread for this story:

"Adelaide suburbs to go high-rise"

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/adelaide-suburbs-to-go-high-rise/story-e6frea6u-1225943300298

Talking about re-zoning along major transport corridors. Excellent move IMO.

St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.
Last edited by Gingernuts on Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Pottsy » Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:35 pm

Gingernuts wrote:St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.

Geez, i was driving down that last weekend. It took absolutely forever to get nowhere. The boy and I were actually cheering every time we got through another set of lights. Hope that's not the way we're headed!
User avatar
Pottsy
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:24 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Barto » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:06 pm

Pottsy wrote:
Gingernuts wrote:St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.

Geez, i was driving down that last weekend. It took absolutely forever to get nowhere. The boy and I were actually cheering every time we got through another set of lights. Hope that's not the way we're headed!


Isn't it like that already in peak hour?
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Pottsy » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:20 pm

Barto wrote:
Pottsy wrote:
Gingernuts wrote:St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.

Geez, i was driving down that last weekend. It took absolutely forever to get nowhere. The boy and I were actually cheering every time we got through another set of lights. Hope that's not the way we're headed!


Isn't it like that already in peak hour?

Yep. Not on Sunday at 1pm with no major event on though.
User avatar
Pottsy
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:24 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Gingernuts » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:37 pm

Pottsy wrote:
Barto wrote:
Pottsy wrote:
Gingernuts wrote:St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.

Geez, i was driving down that last weekend. It took absolutely forever to get nowhere. The boy and I were actually cheering every time we got through another set of lights. Hope that's not the way we're headed!


Isn't it like that already in peak hour?

Yep. Not on Sunday at 1pm with no major event on though.


I guess I was thinking more about the access to public transport (tram). Would work well for Port Rd when the extend the tramline further down it.
User avatar
Gingernuts
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Langhorne Creek

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Sojourner » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:12 pm

Hondo wrote:One thing I have thought about is pedestrian bridges across South Road instead of actually crossing the road. The problem would be finding the room on either side of the road as in some stretches the properties come right up to the footpath.


Totally agree Hondo, they are used extensively interstate over arterial roads and the only one I can recall in existence in SA is on Main North Rd near the Old Spot Hotel, no shortage of people had to be fatalities on that stretch of road before the State Government would actually invest the coin to put it up which in the scheme of things cant have been all that high an amount, especially with most road bridges these days being mainly built off site and installed complete rather than built on site. If some houses have to go then pick ones that are businesses and pay for them to be relocated to a comparable location, and get rid of the pedestrian crossings, it cant be all that hard to work out!
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
User avatar
Sojourner
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:25 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ovingham

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Footy Chick » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:08 pm

There's one on South Terrace next to Pulteney Grammer and one on (bugger, can't think of the street) in Walkerville near ST Whats-his-names school too.
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 26904
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has liked: 1767 times
Been liked: 2191 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby Dissident » Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:28 am

Gingernuts wrote:Though it was worth bumping this thread for this story:

"Adelaide suburbs to go high-rise"

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/adelaide-suburbs-to-go-high-rise/story-e6frea6u-1225943300298

Talking about re-zoning along major transport corridors. Excellent move IMO.

St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.



And obviously ...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 5944439672
I love 'Food and Stuff'. It's where I buy all of my food. And most of my stuff.
User avatar
Dissident
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 6394
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:55 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Future Growth & Infrastructure of Adelaide

Postby White Line Fever » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:09 am

Dissident wrote:
Gingernuts wrote:Though it was worth bumping this thread for this story:

"Adelaide suburbs to go high-rise"

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/adelaide-suburbs-to-go-high-rise/story-e6frea6u-1225943300298

Talking about re-zoning along major transport corridors. Excellent move IMO.

St Kilda Rd in Melbourne is a good example of how it can work if done properly.



And obviously ...

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 5944439672


This is the problem.

If you don't want 'towers' next to you move out to the country.
If you choose close to city residence then this must be expected.

As if someones privacy or a shadow should affect our ability to grow.

This is a great idea putting numbers along transport corridors.
More population = more infrastructure = more jobs

Its a cycle that keeps everyone employed and makes money.
Go Adelaide.
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |