
by Media Park » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:59 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Strawb » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:01 pm
Media Park wrote:WHUFC will become GCFC's version of Joffa...
by Sorry Dude » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:04 pm
Strawb wrote:Media Park wrote:WHUFC will become GCFC's version of Joffa...
He will need a red jacket to match gazza's head.
by Strawb » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:08 pm
Sorry Dude wrote:Strawb wrote:Media Park wrote:WHUFC will become GCFC's version of Joffa...
He will need a red jacket to match gazza's head.
Ha Ha. Might go and buy some shares in sun cream with GAJ being on the GC now.
by whufc » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:17 pm
Media Park wrote:WHUFC will become GCFC's version of Joffa...
by Jim05 » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:23 pm
whufc wrote:Bring on season 2011, the GC will without doubt make the finals next season.
by LMA » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:29 pm
Jim05 wrote:whufc wrote:Bring on season 2011, the GC will without doubt make the finals next season.
Finals in 2012 still think spoon 2001. Would be suprised if they win more than 3 or 4 games.
by G » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:39 pm
by Pidge » Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:45 am
G wrote:Cant believe so many people are giving Tambling a rap as he is an over-rated DUD![]()
Thats 2 trades in the past 12 months that are NO GOOD [Schmidt and now Tambling] and Adelaide wonder why they are struggling when BUMS like this will play fairly regularly![]()
![]()
As for Gold Coast playing finals in 2011, please leave it alone or you'll go blind !!!!
by Booney » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:05 am
by Mr Beefy » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:08 am
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
by Footy Smart » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:24 am
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
by The Riddler » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:25 am
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
by Media Park » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:29 am
Footy Smart wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
Exactly and everyone can now see why AFC chose Dangerfield. Ebert will play 150-200 AFL games but wont be a game breaker or topline midfielder
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Mr Beefy » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:32 am
Footy Smart wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
Exactly and everyone can now see why AFC chose Dangerfield. Ebert will play 150-200 AFL games but wont be a game breaker or topline midfielder
by Bum Crack » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:34 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
Exactly and everyone can now see why AFC chose Dangerfield. Ebert will play 150-200 AFL games but wont be a game breaker or topline midfielder
Neither is Dangerfield at this stage
by Booney » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:35 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
Have you stopped watching power games?
by Booney » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:36 am
The Riddler wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
There's your answer right there
by Footy Smart » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:46 am
Bum Crack wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
Exactly and everyone can now see why AFC chose Dangerfield. Ebert will play 150-200 AFL games but wont be a game breaker or topline midfielder
Neither is Dangerfield at this stage
Exactly.
by the big bang » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:49 am
Booney wrote:The Riddler wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide chasing Brad Ebert...why?
Brad, IMO, burns the ball more than any player I regularly watch. Appears to have the motor to be a midfield runner but just burns it too much.
There's your answer right there
Yep, there are heaps of Father-Son combos with 5 Magarey's between them...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |